An integrated assessment of continuously reinforced and jointed plane concrete pavements

Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 81-98

  Muga, Helen E ^a   Mukherjee, Amlan ^b   Mihelcic, James R ^a   Kueber, Melanie J ^b  

^a University of South Florida   (United States)

^b Michigan Technological University   (United States)

Author keywords

Life cycle costs; Pavements; Product life cycle; Reinforced concrete; Sustainable development

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGIES; BUILT ENVIRONMENT; CONTINUOUSLY REINFORCED CONCRETE PAVEMENT; DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS; DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH; ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS; EXTRACTION PHASE; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT; INTEGRATED FRAMEWORKS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENTS; LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS; LIFECYCLE COSTS; MAINTENANCE COST; MAKING DECISION; PRODUCT LIFE CYCLE; STEEL CONSUMPTION;

ASPHALT; CONCRETE BUILDINGS; CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION; CONCRETE PAVEMENTS; COST ACCOUNTING; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COSTS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FLY ASH; INTEGRATION; MAINTENANCE; PLANNING; RATING; REINFORCED CONCRETE; ROADS AND STREETS; SLAGS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

LIFE CYCLE;

EID: 77956307985     PISSN: 17260531     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/17260530910947277     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bilodeau, A. and Malhotra, V.M. (2000), "High-volume fly ash system: concrete solution for sustainable development" in Materials Journal, Vol. 97, No. 1, pp. 41-8.
2. Boriboonsomsin, K. and Reza, F. (2007), "Mix design and benefit evaluation of high solar reflectance concrete for pavements" in Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2011, pp. 11-20.
3. Chan, A.W. (2007), "Economic and environmental evaluations of life cycle cost analysis practice: a case study of Michigan DOT pavement projects", University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
4. CMU (1997), "Economic input-output life cycle assessment (EIOLCA) model", Carnegie Mellon University Green Design Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, available at: www.eiolca.net (accessed January, 2008).
5. Federal Highway Administration (1994), "Highway statistics 1994", FHWA, Washington, DC, Office of Highway Information Management. US Department of Transportation, Report FHWA-PL-95-042.
6. FHWA (1998), Life Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design Demonstration Project 115 - Participant Handbook, FHWA, Washington, DC, Federal Highway Administration, FHWA-SA-98-400.
7. Hendrickson, C. and Horvath, A. (1998), "Steel versus steel-reinforced concrete bridges: environmental assessment" in Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 111-7.
8. Hendrickson, C., Horvath, A., Joshi, S. and Lave, L. (1998), "Economic input-output models for environmental life-cycle assessment" in Environmental Science & Technology, ACS, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 184A-91A.
9. Horvath, A. (2004), "Construction materials and the environment" in Annual Review Environment and Resource, Vol. 29, pp. 181-204.
10. Horvath, A. and Hendrickson, C. (1998), "Comparison of environmental implications of asphalt and steel-reinforced concrete pavements" in Transportation Research Record, pp. 105-13, NRC No 1626 (Environmental and Social Effects of Transportation).
11. Michigan Local Technical Assistance Program (2006), "Michigan Engineer's Resource Library (MERL)", Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI.
12. Mihelcic, J.R., Crittenden, J.C., Small, M.J., Hokanson, D.R., Shonnard, D.R., Zhang, Q., Chen, H., Sorby, S.A., James, V.U., Sutherland, J.W. and Schnoor, J.L. (2003), "Sustainability science and engineering: emergence of a new metadiscipline" in Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 37, No. 23, pp. 5314-24.
13. MTC (1992), "Ad hoc life cycle costing task group 11 recommended method of pavement selection life-cycle costing of new or reconstructed pavements", Michigan Transportation Commission, Michigan Department of Transportation, Lansing, MI, June.
14. Muga, H.E. (2008), "An integrated framework for assessing components that make-up the built environment", Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, doctoral dissertation.
15. Muga, H.E., Mukherjee, A. and Mihelcic, J.R. (2008), "An integrated assessment of the sustainability of green and built-up roofs" in Journal of Green Building, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 106-27.
16. Naik, T.R., Ramme, B.W. and Tews, J.H. (1995), "Pavement construction with high-volume class C and class F fly ash concrete" in Materials Journal, Vol. 92, No. 2, pp. 200-10.
17. Petkovic, G., Engelsen, C.J., Haoya, A. and Breedveld, G. (2004), "Environmental impact from the use of recycled materials in road construction: method for decision-making in Norway" in Resources, Conservation and Recycling., Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 249-64.
18. Peurifoy, R.L. and Oberlander, G.D. (2002), Estimating Construction Costs, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
19. van Oss, H.G. and Padovani, A.C. (2002), "Cement manufacture and the environmental, part 1: chemistry and technology" in Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 89-105, 17.
20. Zapata, P. and Gambatese, J.A. (2005), "Energy consumption of asphalt and reinforced concrete pavement materials and construction" in Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 9-20, (special issue: sustainability of transportation and other infrastructure systems, ASCE).
21. AASHTO (1989/1993), "AASHTO design guide for design of pavement structures", National Research Council, Washington, DC.
22. Gambatese, J.A. and Rajendran, S. (2005), "Sustainable roadway construction: energy consumption and material waste generation of roadways" in Proceedings of the Construction Research Congress, ASCE, San Diego, CA, pp. 102-8.
23. Means Heavy Construction Cost Data (2005), R.S. Means co, Kingston, MA.