Effectivity of current sterility methods for transgastric NOTES procedures: Results of a randomized porcine study

Endoscopy

Volumn 42, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 748-752

  Eickhoff, A ^a   Vetter, S ^a   Von Renteln, D ^b   Caca, K ^b   Kahler G ^c   Eickhoff, J C ^d   Jakobs, R ^a   Riemann, J F ^a  

^a KLINIKUM LUDWIGSHAFEN   (Germany)

^b KLINIKUM LUDWIGSBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; C REACTIVE PROTEIN; CEFUROXIME; CHLORHEXIDINE; ESOMEPRAZOLE; METRONIDAZOLE; NEOMYCIN; PROTON PUMP INHIBITOR; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIUM CONTAMINATION; BACTERIUM CULTURE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COLONY FORMING UNIT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GALLBLADDER PERFORATION; GASTRIC SUCTION; INCUBATION TIME; MOUTH; NATURAL ORIFICE TRANSLUMINAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; NONHUMAN; PERITONEAL BIOPSY; PERITONITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BLOOD LEVEL; STOMACH; STOMACH LAVAGE; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURVIVAL; SWINE;

ANIMALS; ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS; BACTERIAL INFECTIONS; BILIARY TRACT SURGICAL PROCEDURES; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; GASTRIC LAVAGE; GASTROSTOMY; MODELS, ANIMAL; PERITONEAL CAVITY; PERITONEUM; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION; SWINE;

EID: 77956307792     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1255597     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Swain P. A justification for NOTES natural orifice transluminal endosurgery. Gastrointest Endosc 2007 65 514-516
2. Flora E D., Wilson T G., Martin I J. et al. A review of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for intra-abdominal surgery: experimental models, techniques, and applicability to the clinical setting. Ann Surg 2008 247 583-602
3. Abbas Fehmi S M., Kochman M L. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery 2009: what is the future for the gastroenterologist? Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2009 25 399-404
4. Kalloo A N., Singh V K., Jagannath S B. et al. Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Gastrointest Endosc 2004 60 114-117
5. Hawes R H., Rattner D W., Fleischer D et al. NOTES: where have we been and where are we going? Gastrointest Endosc 2008 67 779-780
6. Hazey J W., Narula V K., Renton D B. et al. Natural-orifice transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy in humans: initial clinical trial. Surg Endosc 2008 22 16-20
7. Narula V K., Happel L C., Volt K et al. Transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy does not require decontamination of the stomach in humans. Surg Endosc 2009 23 1331-1336
8. Steele K, Schweitzer M A., Lyn-Sue J, Kantsevoy S V. Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy and liver biopsy: a feasibility study in human beings. Gastrointest Endosc 2008 68 61-66
9. Kantsevoy S V. Infection prevention in NOTES. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2008 18 291-296
10. McGee S M., Routh J C., Pereira C W., Gettman M T. Minimal contamination of the human peritoneum after transvesical incision. J Endourol 2009 23 659-663
11. Buck L, Michalek J, Van Sickle K et al. Can gastric irrigation prevent infection during NOTES mesh placement? J Gastrointest Surg 2008 12 2010-2014
12. Narula V K., Hazey J W., Renton D B. et al. Transgastric instrumentation and bacterial contamination of the peritoneal cavity. Surg Endosc 2008 22 605-611
13. Lomanto D, Chua H C., Myat M M. et al. Microbiological contamination during transgastric and transvaginal endoscopic techniques. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2009 19 465-469
14. McGee M F., Marks J M., Onders R P., et al. Case Advanced Surgical Endoscopy Team [CASE-T]. Infectious implications in the porcine model of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with PEG-tube closure: a quantitative bacteriologic study. Gastrointest Endosc 2008 68 310-318
15. Mintz Y, Cullen J, Horgan S et al. Pre-op antibiotic gastric lavage reduces post-operative peritoneal infection in a murine natural orifice surgery model. Gastrointest Endosc 2008 67 (5) T1920
16. Ryou M, Hazan R, Rahme L, Thompson C C. The effectiveness of current sterility techniques in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Gastrointest Endosc 2008 67 (5) T1553
17. Kantsevoy S V., Jagannath S B., Niiyama H et al. A novel safe approach to the peritoneal cavity for per-oral transgastric endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 2007 65 497-500
18. von Renteln D, Eickhoff A, Kaehler G et al. Endoscopic closure of the natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) access site to the peritoneal cavity by means of transmural resorbable sutures: an animal survival study. Endoscopy 2009 41 154-159
19. ASGE/SAGES Working Group on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. White Paper October 2005. Gastrointest Endosc 2006 63 199-203
20. Ramamoorthy S L., Lee J K., Luo L et al. The inflammatory response in transgastric surgery: gastric content leak leads to localized inflammatory response and higher adhesive disease. Surg Endosc 2010 24 531-535
21. Auyang E D., Hungness E S., Vaziri K et al. Human NOTES cholecystectomy: transgastric hybrid technique. J Gastrointest Surg 2009 13 1149-1150
22. Grant S W., Hopkins J, Wilson S E. Operative site bacteriology as an indicator of postoperative infectious complications in elective colorectal surgery. Am Surg 1995 61 856-861
23. Nichols R L. Preventing surgical site infections: a surgeons perspective. Emerg Infect Dis 2001 7 220-224
24. Törnqvist A, Forsgren A, Leandoer L, Ursing J. Identification and antibiotic prophylaxis of high-risk patients in elective colorectal surgery. World J Surg 1987 11 115-119
25. Ramamoorthy S L., Lee J K., Mintz Y et al. The impact of proton-pump inhibitors on intraperitoneal sepsis: a word of caution for transgastric NOTES procedures. Surg Endosc 2010 24 16-20
26. Dubcenco E, Assumpcao L, Dray X et al. Adhesion formation after peritoneoscopy with liver biopsy in a survival porcine model: comparison of laparotomy, laparoscopy, and transgastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Endoscopy 2009 41 971-978
27. Bachman S L., Sporn E, Furrer J L. et al. Colonic sterilization for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures: a comparison of two decontamination protocols. Surg Endosc 2009 23 1854-1859
28. Romagnuolo J, Morgan K A., Morris J et al. Differences in peritoneal bacterial contamination of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) vs. laparoscopy in a colon perforation and repair model. Gastrointest Endosc 2008 67 (5) S1342