Effect of high parity on the occurrence of prediabetes: A cohort study

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 89, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1182-1186

  Al Farsi, Yahya M ^a,b   Brooks, Daniel R ^b   Werler, Martha M ^b   Cabral, Howard J ^b   Al Shafei, Mohammed A ^a   Wallenburg, Henk C ^a  

^a SULTAN QABOOS UNIVERSITY   (Oman)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

AMAL study; Cox proportional hazards model; Directed acyclic graphs; Epidemiologic confounding; High parity; Prediabetes

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFOUNDING VARIABLE; DELIVERY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; IMPAIRED GLUCOSE TOLERANCE; INCIDENCE; INCOME; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATERNAL AGE; OMAN; ORAL GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; PARITY; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCREENING TEST; MIDDLE AGED; PREDIABETIC STATE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RISK ASSESSMENT; COMMUNITY TRIAL; FOLLOW UP; GESTATION PERIOD; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MATERNAL AGE; MIDDLE AGED; OMAN; PARITY; PREDIABETIC STATE; PREGNANCY; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 77956307553     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00016349.2010.501854     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Fact Sheet, United States, 2005. Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/pdf/ ndfs-2005.pdf. (accessed 25 January, 2009).
2. Genuth S, Alberti KG, Bennett P, Buse J, Defronzo R, Kahn R, et al. Follow-up report on the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:3160-3167
3. Petersen JL, McGuire DK. Impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glucose: a review of diagnosis, clinical implications and management. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2005;2:9-15.
4. Aliyu MH, Jolly PE, Ehiri JE, Salihu HM. High parity and adverse birth outcomes: exploring the maze. Birth. 2005;32: 45-59.
5. Reece EA, Leguizamon G, Wiznitzer A. Gestational diabetes: the need for a common ground. Lancet. 2009;373:1789-1797
6. Rizk DE, Khalfan M, Ezimokhai M. Obstetric outcome in grand multipara in the United Arab Emirates. A case control study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2001;264:194-198
7. King PA, Duthie SJ, Ma HK. Grand multiparity: a reappraisal of the risks. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1991;36:13-16
8. Humphrey MD. Is grand multiparity an independent predictor of pregnancy risk? A retrospective observational study. MJA. 2003;179:294-296
9. Greenland S, Pearl J, Robins JM. Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology. 1999;10:37-48.
10. Twigg SM, Kamp MC, Davis TM, Neylon EK, Flack JR. Prediabetes: a position statement from the Australian Diabetes Society and Australian Diabetes Educators Association. MJA. 2007;186:461-465
11. Bai J, Wong F, Bauman A, Mohsin M. Parity and pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:274-278
12. Kumari AS, Badrinath P. Extreme grand multiparity: is it an obstetric risk factor? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002; 101:22-25
13. Juntunen K, Kirkinen P, Kauppila A. The clinical outcome in pregnancies of grand multiparous women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997;76:755-759
14. Evaldson GR. The grand multipara in modern obstetrics. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1990;30:217-223
15. Mor-Yosef S, Seidman D, Samueloff A, Schenker JG. The effects ofthe socioeconomic status on the perinatal outcome of grand multipara. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1990;36: 117-123
16. Mwambingu FT, Al Meshari AA, Akiel A. The problem of grand multiparity in current obstetric practice. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1988;26:355-359
17. Roman H, Robillard P, Verspyck E, Hulsey TC, Marpeau L, Barau G. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes in grand multi- parity. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:1294-1299
18. Manson JE, Rimm EB, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Arky RA, et al. Parity and the incidence of non-insulin- dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Med. 1992;93:13-18