WSCOLAB: Structured collaborative tagging for web service matchmaking

WEBIST 2010 - Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technology

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 70-77

  Gawinecki, Maciej ^a   Cabri, Giacomo ^a   Paprzycki, Marcin ^b   Maria, Ganzha ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

^b SYSTEMS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Poland)

Author keywords

Collaborative tagging; Discovery; Evaluation; Matchmaking; Web service

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE TAGGING; DISCOVERY; EVALUATION; MATCHMAKING; SEMANTIC SERVICE; SERVICE FUNCTIONS; WEB SERVICE DESCRIPTION; WEB SERVICE MATCHMAKING;

INFORMATION SERVICES; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SERVICE ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE (SOA);

WEB SERVICES;

EID: 77956306159     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (43)

1. Al-Masri, E. and Mahmoud, Q. H. (2008a). Discovering Web Services in Search Engines. IEEE Internet Computing, 12(3).
2. Al-Masri, E. and Mahmoud, Q. H. (2008b). Investigating Web Services on the World Wide Web. In WWW.
3. Dietze, S., Benn, N., Conconi, J. D., and Cattaneo, F. (2009). Two-Fold Semantic Web Service Matchmaking-Applying Ontology Mapping for Service Discovery. In ASWC.
4. Dong, X., Halevy, A. Y., Madhavan, J., Nemes, E., and Zhang, J. (2004). Similarity Search for Web Services. In VLDB.
5. Fernández, A., Hayes, C., Loutas, N., Peristeras, V., Polleres, A., and Tarabanis, K. A. (2008). Closing the Service Discovery Gap by Collaborative Tagging and Clustering Techniques. In SMRR.
6. Furnas, G. W., Fake, C., von Ahn, L., Schachter, J., Golder, S., Fox, K., Davis, M., Marlow, C., and Naaman, M. (2006). Why do tagging systems work? In CHI.
7. Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., Gomez, L. M., and Dumais, S. T. (1987). The vocabulary problem in human-system communication. Commun. ACM, 30(11).
8. Gawinecki, M. (2009a). Analysis of SeekDa Tags for Web Service Matchmaking. Technical report, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia.
9. Gawinecki, M. (2009b). WSColab Portal, http://mars.ing.unimo.it/wscolab/.
10. Hagemann, S., Letz, C., and Vossen, G. (2007). Web Service Discovery - Reality Check 2.0. In NWESP, pages 113-118.
11. Järvelin, K. and Kekäläinen, J. (2002). Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 20(4):422-446.
12. JDK (2009). Java Development Kit. http://java.sun.com/javase/.
13. Klusch, M. and Kapahnke, P. (2008). Semantic Web Service Selection with SAWSDL-MX. In SMRR, volume 416.
14. Klusch, M., Kapahnke, P., and Zinnikus, I. (2009). SAWSDL-MX2: A Machine-Learning Approach for Integrating Semantic Web Service Matchmaking Variants. In ICWS, pages 335-342.
15. Knackstedt, R., Kuropka, D., Mller, O., and Polyvyanyy, A. (2008). An Ontology-based Service Discovery Approach for the Provisioning of Product-Service Bundles. In ECIS.
16. Küster, U. (2010). JGDEval at S3 Contest 2009 - Results. http://fusion.cs.uni-jena.de/professur/jgdeval/jgdeval-at-s3-contest-2009- results.
17. Küster, U. and König-Ries, B. (2009). Relevance Judgments for Web Services Retrieval - A Methodology and Test Collection for SWS Discovery Evaluation. In ECOWS.
18. Lausen, H. and Haselwanter, T. (2007). Finding Web Services. In ESTC.
19. Merobase (2009). http://www.merobase.com/.
20. Meyer, H. and Weske, M. (2006). Light-Weight Semantic Service Annotations through Tagging. In ICSOC, volume 4294 of LNCS, pages 465 470.
21. Mika, P. (2005). Ontologies are us: A unified model of social networks and semantics. J. Web Sem., 5(1).
22. Mili, H., Mili, F., and Mili, A. (1995). Reusing Software: Issues and Research Directions. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 21(6):528-562.
23. Montaner, M., López, B., and De La Rosa, J. L. (2003). A Taxonomy of Recommender Agents on the Internet. Artif. Intell. Rev., 19(4):285-330.
24. OCML (2009). http://kmi.open.ac.uk/projects/ocml/.
25. OWL-S (2009). http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/SUBM-OWL-S-20041122/.
26. Paolucci, M., Kawamura, T., Payne, T. R., and Sycara, K. P. (2002). Semantic Matching of Web Services Capabilities. In ISWC, pages 333-347.
27. Prieto-Díaz, R. (1991). Implementing faceted classification for software reuse. Commun. ACM, 34(5):88-97.
28. ProgrammableWeb (2009). http://programmableweb.com.
29. S3 (2009). Semantic Service Selection contest. http://www-ags.dfki.uni- sb.de/klusch/s3/html/2009.html.
30. Salton, G. and Buckley, C. (1988). Term-Weighting Approaches in Automatic Text Retrieval. Inf. Process. Manage., 24(5):513-523.
31. SAWSDL (2009). http://www.w3.org/TR/sawsdl/.
32. SeekDa (2009). http://seekda.com.
33. Sen, S., Lam, S. K., Rashid, A. M., Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Osterhouse, J., Harper, F. M., and Riedl, J. (2006). tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution. In CSCW, pages 181-190.
34. Shirky, C. (2005). Ontology is Overrated: Categories, Links, and Tags, http://www.shirky.com/writings/ontology.overrated.html.
35. SME2 (2009). Semantic Web Service Matchmaker Evaluation Environment. http://projects.semwebcentral.org/projects/sme2/.
36. SOA World Magazine (2009). Microsoft, IBM, SAP To Discontinue UDDI Web Services Registry Effort, http://soa.sys-con.com/node/164624.
37. TREC (2009). Trec REtreival Conference. http://trec.nist.gov/.
38. UNSPSC (2009). United Nations Standard Products and Services Code, http://www.unspsc.org.
39. Wang, Y. and Stroulia, E. (2003). Semantic Structure Matching for Assessing Web-Service Similarity. In ICSOC.
40. Weerawarana, S., Curbera, F., Leymann, F., Storey, T., and Ferguson, D. F. (2005). Web Services Platform Architecture: SOAP, WSDL, WS-Policy, WS-Addressing, WS-BPEL, WS-Reliable Messaging and More. Prentice Hall PTR.
41. Xu, Z., Fu, Y., Mao, J., and Su, D. (2006). Towards the Semantic Web: Collaborative Tag Suggestions. In Proceedings of the Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop at the WWW 2006.
42. Zaremski, A. M. and Wing, J. M. (1995). Signature Matching: A Tool for Using Software Libraries. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol., 4(2):146-170.
43. Zobel, J. and Moffat, A. (2006). Inverted files for text search engines. ACM Comput. Surv., 38(2):6.