Population-based study of cesarean section after in vitro fertilization in Australia

Birth

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 184-191

  Sullivan, Elizabeth A ^a   Chapman, Michael G ^a,b   Wang, Yueping A ^a   Adamson, G David ^c,d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b IVFAustralia   (Australia)

^c Fertility Physicians of Northern California   (United States)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

cesarean section; embryo transfer; epidemiology; in vitro fertilization; intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CESAREAN SECTION; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; NATURAL CHILDBIRTH; OOCYTE DONATION; PREGNANCY; REGISTER; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICS; TWINS;

ADULT; AUSTRALIA; CESAREAN SECTION; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NATURAL CHILDBIRTH; OOCYTE DONATION; PREGNANCY; REGISTRIES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TWINS;

EID: 77956302252     PISSN: 07307659     EISSN: 1523536X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00405.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Shevell T, Malone FD, Vidaver J, et al for the FASTER Research Consortium. Assisted Reproductive Technology and Pregnancy Outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2005 106: 1039 1044.
2. Chambers GM, Chapman MG, Grayson N, et al. Babies born after ART treatment cost more than non-ART babies: A cost analysis of inpatient birth-admission costs of singleton and multiple gestation pregnancies. Hum Reprod Advance Access published on September 28, 2007; doi:10.1093/humrep/ dem311. Hum Reprod 2007 22: 3108 3115.
3. Young D. What is normal childbirth and do we need more statements about it? Birth 2009 36: 1 3.
4. Nygren KG, Finnstroom O, Kallen B, Otterblad Olausson P. Population-based Swedish studies of outcomes after in vitro fertilisation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007 86: 774 782.
5. Kallen B, Finnstrom O, Nygren KG, et al. In vitro fertilization in Sweden: Maternal morbidity and mortality. BJOG 2005 112: 1529 1535.
6. Basso O, Baird DB. Infertility and preterm delivery, birthweight and cesarean section: A study within the Danish National Birth Cohort. Hum Reprod 2003 18: 2478 2484.
7. Pinborg A, Loft A, Rasmussen S, et al. Neonatal outcome in a Danish national cohort of 3438 IVF/ICSI and 10362 non-IVF/ICSI twins born between 1995 and 2000. Hum Reprod 2004 19: 435 441.
8. Koivurova S, Hartikainen AL, Karinen L, et al. The course of pregnancy and delivery and the use of maternal healthcare services after standard IVF in Northern Finland 1990-1995. Hum Reprod 2002 17: 2897 2903.
9. Sheiner E, Shoham-Vardi I, Hershkovitz R, et al. Infertility treatment is an independent risk factor for cesarean section among nulliparous women aged 40 and above. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001 185: 888 892.
10. Kurinczuk JJ, Hockley C. Fertility Treatment in 2006-a statistical analysis. London: Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority 2010. Accessed July 15, 2010. Available at: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/Fertility-treatments- 2006.pdf.
11. Gunby J, Bissonnette F, Librach C, et al. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2004 results from the Canadian ART Register. Fertil Steril 2008 89: 1123 1132.
12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2006 Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates: National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008. Accessed September 28, 2009. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ART/ART2006/index.htm.
13. ESHRE 2008: The European IVF Monitoring Programme (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2004. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2008 23: 756 771.
14. Zegers-Hochschild F, Schwarze JE, Galdames V. Assisted reproductive technology in Latin America: An example of regional cooperation and development. ESHRE Monogr 2008 1: 42 47.
15. Wang YA, Dean JH, Badgery-Parker T, Sullivan EA. Assisted Reproduction Technology in Australia and New Zealand 2006. Assisted Reproduction Technology Series No. 12. AIHW Cat. No. PER43. AIHW National Perinatal Statistics Unit, Sydney 2008.
16. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Caesarean Section Clinical Guidelines CG13. Issued April 2004. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). London: RCOG Press, 2004. Accessed September 28, 2009. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/ CG013fullguideline.pdf.
17. Villar J, Carroli G, Zavaleta N, et al. Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with cesarean section: Multicentre prospective study. BMJ 2007 335: 1025 1029.
18. MacDorman MF, Declercq E, Menacker F, Malloy MH. Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: Application of an intention-to-treat model. Birth 2008 35: 3 8.
19. Laws PJ, Abeywardana S, Walker J, Sullivan EA. Australia's Mothers and Babies 2005. Perinatal Statistics Series No. 20, Cat. No. PER 40. AIHW National Perinatal Statistics Unit, Sydney, 2007.
20. SPSS, Inc. SPSS for Windows, Version 17.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc, 2009.
21. World Health Organization. Maternal and newborn health/safe motherhood, division of reproductive health. Care in Normal Birth: A Practical Guide. WHO/FRH/MSM/96.24. Report of a technical working group. Geneva: WHO, 1997. Accessed September 28, 2009. Available at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1996/WHO- FRH-MSM-96.24.pdf.
22. Minkoff HL, Berkowitz R. The myth of the precious baby. Obstet Gynecol 2005 106: 607 609.
23. Belva F, Henriet S, Van den Abbeel E, et al. Neonatal outcome of 937 children born after transfer of cryopreserved embryos obtained by ICSI and IVF and comparison with outcome data of fresh ICSI and IVF cycles. Hum Reprod 2008 23: 2227 2238.
24. Allen VM, Wilson RD, Cheung A. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2006 28: 224 225.
25. Reddy UM, Wapner RJ, Rebar RW, Tasca RJ. Infertility, assisted reproductive technology, and adverse pregnancy outcomes executive summary of a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Workshop. Obstet Gynecol 2007 109: 967 977.
26. Ochsenkuhn R, Strowitzki T, Gurtner M, et al. Pregnancy complications, obstetric risks and neonatal outcome in singleton and twin pregnancies after GIFT and IVF. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2003 268: 256 261.
27. Hansen AK, Wisborg K, Uldbjerg N, Henriksen TB. Risk of respiratory morbidity in term infants delivered by elective cesarean section: Cohort study. BMJ 2008 336: 85 87.
28. Morrison JJ, Rennie JM, Milton PJ. Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery at term: Influence of timing of elective cesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995 102: 101 106.
29. Zanardo V, Padovani E, Pittini C, et al. The influence of timing of elective cesarean section on risk of neonatal pneumothorax. J Pediatr 2007 150: 252 255.
30. Menacker F, Declercq E, MacDorman MF. Cesarean delivery: Background, trends and epidemiology. Semin Perinatol 2006 30: 235 241.
31. Minkoff HL, Chervenak FA. Elective primary cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2003 348 (10 946 950.
32. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART), de Mouzon J, Lancaster P, et al. Collaborative report on assisted reproductive technology, 2002. Hum Reprod 2009 24 (9 2310 2320.