Situational evaluation of teaching on campus

New Directions for Teaching and Learning

Volumn 2000, Issue 83, 2000, Pages 51-72

  Stake, Robert E ^a   Cisneros Cohernour, Edith J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956298627     PISSN: 02710633     EISSN: 15360768     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tl.8305     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Alpert, D. A “Representation of Quality.” Seminar lecture in Theories of Educational Evaluation, University of Illinois, Feb. 23, 1998.
2. Amidon, E and Hunter, E Improving Teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966.
3. Association for Curriculum and Supervision and Curriculum Development. Using What We Know about Teaching. Washington, D.C.: Association for Curriculum and Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1984.
4. Berlak, H and others. Toward a New Science of Educational Testing and Assessment. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 1992.
5. Borich, G. D The Appraisal of Teaching. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1977.
6. Braskamp, L. A Brandenburg, D. C and Ory, J. C Evaluating Teaching Effectiveness. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1984.
7. Braskamp, L and Ory, J Assessing Faculty Work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1994.
8. Broudy, H. S “Historic Exemplars of Teaching Method.” In N. L. Gage (ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963.
9. Brown, J. S “Common Sense of Purpose.” In What Is a Community of Practical Community Intelligence Labs, [http://www.co-i-l.com/coil/knowledge-garden/cop/definitions.shtml]. 1997.
10. Cashin, W. E Student Ratings of Teaching: A Summary of the Research. Manhattan: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, 1988.
11. Cave, M Hanney, S Kogan, M and Travett, G The Use of Performance Indicators in Higher Education: A Critical Analysis of Developing Practice. London: Kingsley, 1988.
12. Cisneros-Cohemour, E. J “Trade-offs: The Use of Student Ratings Results and Its Possible Impact on Instructional Improvement.” Unpublished report, University of Illinois, 1997.
13. Community Intelligence Labs. Communities of Practice, [http://www.co-i-l.com/coil/knowledge-garden/cop/index.shtml]. 1997.
14. Cronbach, L. J and Gleser, G Psychological Tests and Personnel Decisions. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1965.
15. Denny, T “Some Still Do.” In R. E. Stake and J. A. Easley (eds.), Case Studies in Science Education. 1978.
16. Doyle, K. O Jr Evaluating Teaching. San Francisco: New Lexington Press, 1982.
17. Dunkin, M. J and Biddle, B. J The Study of Teaching. Austin, Tex.: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1974.
18. Eble, K. E The Aims of College Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1983.
19. El Hassan, K “Students’ Ratings of Instruction: Generalizability of Findings.” Studies in Education, 1995, 21, 411-429.
20. Feldman, K. A “Instructional Effectiveness of College Teachers as Judged by Teachers Themselves, Current Students, Colleagues, Administrators, and External (Neutral Observers).” Research in Higher Education, 1989, 30, 137-172.
21. Fetterman, D. M and Pitman, M. A Educational Evaluation: Ethnography in Theory, Practice, and Politics. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1986.
22. Gardner, H Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books, 1983.
23. Geneva, W. J Madoff, M. J Chink, R and Thomas, G. B Mutual Benefit Evaluation of Faculty and Administrators in Higher Education. New York: Ballinger, 1976.
24. Jaeger, R “World Class Standards, Choice, and Privatization: Weak Measurement Serving Presumptive Policy.” Vice presidential address to the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, 1992.
25. Johnson-Letz, P and Johnson-Letz, T “Bonding by Exposure to Common Problems.” In What Is a Community of Practice? Community Intelligence Labs, [http://www.co-i-lcom/coil/knowledge-garden/cop/definitions.shtml]. 1997.
26. Kinney, D. P and Smith, S. P “Age and Teaching Performance.” Journal of Higher Education, 1992, 63, 282-302.
27. Land, E “The Experimental Bases of the Retinex Theory of Color Vision.” Beckman Lecture, University of Illinois, November 21, 1985.
28. Mabry, L Portfolios Plus: A Critical Guide to Alternative Assessments and Portfolios. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Corwin Press, 1999.
29. Marsh, H. W “Students’ Evaluations of University Teaching: Research Findings, Methodological Issues, and Directions for Future Research.” International Journal of Educational Research, 1987, 11, 253-388.
30. Marlon, F and Säljö, R “Outcome and Process.” British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976, 46, 4-11.
31. Messick, S. L “Validity.” In R. L. Linn (ed.), Educational Measurement. (3rd ed.) New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan, 1989.
32. Meyer, J. W Scott, R. W and Deal, T. E “Institutional and Technical Sources of Organizational Structure: Explaining the Structure of Educational Organizations.” In H. D. Stein (ed.), Organization and the Human Services. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1981.
33. Millman, J “Criterion Referenced Measurement.” In W. James Popham (ed.), Evaluation in Education. Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan, 1974.
34. Office of Instructional Resources. Faculty Handbook of Teaching Evaluation. Urbana: University of Illinois, 1989.
35. Peters, T. J and Waterman, R. H Jr In Search of Excellence. New York: Warner, 1984.
36. Porter, A “External Standards and Good Teaching.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1989, 11, 354.
37. Romberg, T. A. (ed.). Reform in School Mathematics and Authentic Assessment. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 1995.
38. Ryans, D. G Characteristics of Teachers. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1960.
39. Schon, D The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books, 1982.
40. Schrecker, E No Ivory Tower: McCarthyism and the Universities. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.
41. Scriven, M “The Evaluation of Teachers and Teaching.” California Journal of Education Research, 1974, 15, 109-115.
42. Scriven, M “The State of the Art in Tertiary Teacher Evaluation.” Research and Development in Higher Education, 1988, 10, 2-27.
43. Scriven, M Evaluating Teachers as Professionals. Perth: University of Western Australia, 1994.
44. Scriven, M “A Unified Theory Approach to Teacher Evaluation.” Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1995, 21, 111-129.
45. Seldin, P “How Colleges Evaluate Professors: 1983 versus 1993.” AAHE Bulletin, 1993, 12, 6-8.
46. Shulman, L “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.” Harvard Education Review, 1986, 57, 1-22.
47. Smith, L. M and Geoffrey, K. L The Complexities of an Urban Classroom: An Analysis Toward General Theory of Teaching New York: Rinehart and Winston, 1968.
48. Stake, R “The Invalidity of Standardized Testing for Measuring Mathematics Achievement.” In T. A. Romberg (ed.), Reform in School Mathematics and Authentic Assessment. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995.
49. Stake, R and others. “The Evolving Syntheses of Program Value.” Evaluation Practice, 18 (2), 1997, 2, 89-103.
50. Tolstoy, L Anna Karenina. New York: Penguin, 1877.
51. Wenger, E “Communities of Practice: Where Learning Happens.” Benchmarks, Fall 1991, pp. 6-8.