National surveys of state paroling authorities: Models of service delivery

Federal Probation

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 34-42

  Caplan, Joel M ^a   Kinnevy, Susan C ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956290098     PISSN: 00149128     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. American Law Institute, (n.d.). Model Penal Code. Retrieved February 22, 2007, from http://www.ali.org/ali/stu-mod-pen.htm.
2. Ashford, J. B. & LeCroy, C. W. (1993). Juvenile parole policy in the United States: Determinate versus indeterminate models. Justice Quarterly, 70(2), 179-195.
3. Bottomley, A. K. (1990). Parole in transition: A comparative study of origins, developments, and prospects for the 1990s. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research (Volume 12) (pp. 319-374). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4. Caplan, J. M. (2006). Parole system anomie: Conflicting models of casework and surveillance. Federal Probation, 70(3), 32-36.
5. Conley, J. A. & Zimmerman, S. E. (1982). Decision making by a part-time parole board: An observational and empirical study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 9(4), 396-431.
6. Criminological Research Associates. (1974). Rehabilitating parole: An alternative model. Berkley, CA: Author.
7. Griset, P. (1995). The politics and economics of increased correctional discretion over time served: A New York case study. Justice Quarterly, 72(2), 307-323.
8. Hart, W. (1978). Oklahoma's "down home" parole board. Corrections Magazine, 4(3), 54-59.
9. Ireland, C. S. & Prause, J. (2005). Discretionary parole release: Length of imprisonment, percent of sentence served and recidivism. Journal of Crime & Justice, 28(2), 27-50.
10. Kinnevy, S. C. & Caplan, J. M. (2008). Findings from the APAI International Survey of Releasing Authorities [Research Report]. Philadelphia, PA: Center for Research on Youth & Social Policy.
11. Office for Victims of Crime (1998, August). Victims' Rights: Two decades of dramatic change. OVC Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
12. Petersilia, J. (1999). Parole and prisoner reentry in the United States. In M. Tonry & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Prisons (pp. 479-529). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13. Pew Charitable Trusts. (2007). Public safety, public spending: Forecasting America's prison population 2007-2011. Philadelphia, PA: Author.
14. Robinson, P. H. & Dubber, M. D. (1999). An Introduction to the Model Penal Code. Retrieved February 22, 2007, from http://www.law.upenn.edu/fac/ phrobins/intro-modpencode.pdf
15. Shade, O. D. (1982). Determinate sentencing: A racist reform? Corrections Today, 44(5), 62-65.
16. Star, D. (1979). Summary parole: A six and twelve month follow-up evaluation [Research Report]. Sacramento, CA: Corrections Department.
17. Tobolowsky, P. M. (1999). Victim participation in the criminal justice process: Fifteen years after the President's Task Force on Victims of Crime. New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement, 25(1), 21-105.
18. Tonry, M. (1999). Reconsidering indeterminate and structured sentencing. Sentencing & Corrections: Issues for the 21st Century, 2, 1-11.
19. West, A. & Seiter, R. P. (2004). Social worker or cop? Measuring the supervision styles of probation & parole officers in Kentucky. Journal of Crime & Justice, 27(2), 27-57.