Selection and presentation of imaging figures in the medical literature

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2010, Pages

  Siontis, George C M ^a   Patsopoulos, Nikolaos A ^a   Vlahos, Antonios P ^a   Ioannidis, John P A ^a,b,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINA   (Greece)

^b INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE   (Greece)

^c TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOGRAPHY; IMAGING SYSTEM; MEDICAL LITERATURE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PUBLICATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIOGRAPHY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLICATIONS; REFERENCE STANDARDS;

EID: 77956285825     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010888     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Altman DG, Simera I, Hoey J, Moher D, Schulz K (2008) EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research. Lancet 371: 1149-1150.
2. Thomson Journal Citation Reports website (2010) [http://admin-apps.isiknowledge.com/JCR/JCR?SID=Z14DEmgefAdA761bGcP] Accessible with subscription.
3. Hermoye L, Laamari-Azjal I, Cao Z, Annet L, Lerut J, et al. (2005) Liver segmentation in living liver transplant donors: comparison of semiautomatic and manual methods. Radiology 234: 171-178.
4. Tack D, De Maertelaer V, Petit W, Scillia P, Muller P, et al. (2005) Multidetector row CT pulmonary angiography: comparison of standard-dose and simulated low-dose techniques. Radiology 236: 318-325.
5. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, et al. (2003) The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 138: W1-W12.
6. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, et al. (2003) Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. BMJ 326: 41-44.
7. Smidt N, Rutjes AW, van der Windt DA, Ostelo RW, Bossuyt PM, et al. (2006) The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved? Neurology 67: 792-797.
8. Leeflang MM, Deeks JJ, Gatsonis C, Bossuyt PM, for the Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Working Group (2008) Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Ann Intern Med 149: 889-897.
9. Whiting PF, Weswood ME, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PN, et al. (2006) Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 6: 9.
10. Lawler A (2001) Visualizing science. New imaging tools put the art back into science. Science 292: 1044-1047.
11. Couzin J (2006) Scientific publishing. Don't pretty up that picture just yet. Science 314: 1866-1868.
12. Pearson H (2005) Image manipulation: CSI: cell biology. Nature 434: 952-953.
13. Schriger DL, Sinha R, Schroter S, Liu PY, Altman DG (2006) From submission to publication: a retrospective review of the tables and figures in a cohort of randomized controlled trials submitted to the British Medical Journal. Ann Emerg Med 48: 750-756.
14. Douglas PS (2006) Improving imaging: our professional imperative. J Am Coll Cardiol 48: 2152-2155.
15. Smidt N, Rutjes AW, van der Windt DA, Ostelo RW, Reitsma JB, et al. (2005) Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. Radiology 235: 347-353.
16. Smidt N, Rutjes AW, van der Windt DA, Ostelo RW, Bossuyt PM, et al. (2006) Reproducibility of the STARD checklist: an instrument to assess the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 6: 12.
17. Knottnerus JA, Muris JW (2003) Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study. J Clin Epidemiol 56: 1118-1128.
18. Bossuyt PM (2009) Diagnostic accuracy reporting guidelines should prescribe reporting, not modeling. J Clin Epidemiol 62: 355-356.