On the issue of peptide recognition in T cell development

Self/Nonself - Immune Recognition and Signaling

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 55-61

  Crites, Travis J ^a   Varma, Rajat ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

CD4; CD8; Microcluster; Peptides; Selection; Signaling; TCR

Indexed keywords

MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGEN CLASS 1; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGEN CLASS 2; PEPTIDE; T LYMPHOCYTE RECEPTOR;

ANTIGEN EXPRESSION; ARTICLE; CD4+ T LYMPHOCYTE; CD8+ T LYMPHOCYTE; CELL INTERACTION; CELL LINEAGE; CELL MATURATION; CELL SELECTION; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; T LYMPHOCYTE; THYMOCYTE;

EID: 77956275082     PISSN: 19382030     EISSN: 19382049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/self.1.1.10962     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Nitta T, Murata S, Ueno T, Tanaka K, Takahama Y. Thymic microenvironments for T-cell repertoire formation. Adv Immunol 2008; 99:59-94.
2. Bevan MJ. In thymic selection, peptide diversity gives and takes away. Immunity 1997; 7:175-178.
3. Allen PM. Peptides in positive and negative selection: a delicate balance. Cell 1994; 76:593-596.
4. von Boehmer H. Positive selection of lymphocytes. Cell 1994; 76:219-228.
5. Ashton-Rickardt PG, Tonegawa S. A differentialavidity model for T-cell selection. Immunol Today 1994; 15:362-366.
6. Mathis D, Benoist C. Aire. Annu Rev Immunol 2009; 27:287-312.
7. Gallegos AM, Bevan MJ. Central tolerance to tissuespecific antigens mediated by direct and indirect antigen presentation. J Exp Med 2004; 200:1039-1049.
8. Ehrlich LI, Oh DY, Weissman IL, Lewis RS. Differential contribution of chemotaxis and substrate restriction to segregation of immature and mature thymocytes. Immunity 2009; 6:986-998.
9. Alam SM, Davies GM, Lin CM, Zal T, Nasholds W, Jameson SC, et al. Qualitative and quantitative differences in T cell receptor binding of agonist and antagonist ligands. Immunity 1999; 10:227-237.
10. Alam SM, Travers PJ, Wung JL, Nasholds W, Redpath S, Jameson SC, et al. T-cell-receptor affinity and thymocyte positive selection. Nature 1996; 381:616-620.
11. Daniels MA, Teixeiro E, Gill J, Hausmann B, Roubaty D, Holmberg K, et al. Thymic selection threshold defined by compartmentalization of Ras/ MAPK signalling. Nature 2006; 444:724-729.
12. Ernst B, Lee DS, Chang JM, Sprent J, Surh CD. The peptide ligands mediating positive selection in the thymus control T cell survival and homeostatic proliferation in the periphery. Immunity 1999; 11:173-181.
13. Kieper WC, Burghardt JT, Surh CD. A role for TCR affinity in regulating naive T cell homeostasis. J Immunol 2004; 172:40-44.
14. + 8lo transitional cells during positive selection of CD8+ T cells. J Exp Med 2003; 197:1709-1719.
15. Liu X, Bosselut R. Duration of TCR signaling controls CD4-CD8 lineage differentiation in vivo. Nat Immunol 2004; 5:280-288.
16. Sarafova SD, Van Laethem F, Adoro S, Guinter T, Sharrow SO, Feigenbaum L, et al. Upregulation of CD4 expression during MHC class II-specific positive selection is essential for error-free lineage choice. Immunity 2009; 31:480-490.
17. Robey EA, Fowlkes BJ, Gordon JW, Kioussis D, von Boehmer H, Ramsdell F, et al. Thymic selection in CD8 transgenic mice supports an instructive model for commitment to a CD4 or CD8 lineage. Cell 1991; 64:99-107.
18. + cytolytic T cells. Nature 1990; 344:742-746.
19. + T cells in the thymus. Cell 1993; 73:1041-1049.
20. +T cells in Tap-1 mutant mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91:6525-6528.
21. Ashton-Rickardt PG, Bandeira A, Delaney JR, Van Kaer L, Pircher HP, Zinkernagel RM, et al. Evidence for a differential avidity model of T cell selection in the thymus. Cell 1994; 76:651-663.
22. Sebzda E, Wallace VA, Mayer J, Yeung RS, Mak TW, Ohashi PS. Positive and negative thymocyte selection induced by different concentrations of a single peptide. Science 1994; 263:1615-1618.
23. Cook JR, Wormstall EM, Hornell T, Russell J, Connolly JM, Hansen TH. Quantitation of the cell surface level of Ld resulting in positive versus negative selection of the 2C transgenic T cell receptor in vivo. Immunity 1997; 7:233-241.
24. Hogquist KA, Jameson SC, Heath WR, Howard JL, Bevan MJ, Carbone FR. T cell receptor antagonist peptides induce positive selection. Cell 1994; 76:17-27.
25. Smyth LA, Williams O, Huby RD, Norton T, Acuto O, Ley SC, et al. Altered peptide ligands induce quantitatively but not qualitatively different intracellular signals in primary thymocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:8193-8198.
26. Wang B, Primeau TM, Myers N, Rohrs HW, Gross ML, Lybarger L, et al. A single peptide-MHC complex positively selects a diverse and specific CD8 T cell repertoire. Science 2009; 326:871-874.
27. Hogquist KA, Tomlinson AJ, Kieper WC, McGargill MA, Hart MC, Naylor S, et al. Identification of a naturally occurring ligand for thymic positive selection. Immunity 1997; 6:389-399.
28. Santori FR, Kieper WC, Brown SM, Lu Y, Neubert TA, Johnson KL, et al. Rare, structurally homologous self-peptides promote thymocyte positive selection. Immunity 2002; 17:131-142.
29. Murata S, Takahama Y, Tanaka K. Thymoproteasome: probable role in generating positively selecting peptides. Curr Opin Immunol 2008; 20:192-196.
30. Takahama Y, Tanaka K, Murata S. Modest cortex and promiscuous medulla for thymic repertoire formation. Trends Immunol 2008; 29:251-255.
31. Murata S, Sasaki K, Kishimoto T, Niwa S, Hayashi H, Takahama Y, et al. Regulation of CD8+ T cell development by thymus-specific proteasomes. Science 2007; 316:1349-1353.
32. Ziegler A, Muller CA, Bockmann RA, Uchanska-Ziegler B. Low-affinity peptides and T-cell selection.Trends Immunol 2009; 30:53-60.
33. Rehm A, Rohr A, Seitz C, Wonigeit K, Ziegler A, Uchanska-Ziegler B. Structurally diverse forms of HLA-B27 molecules are displayed in vivo in a cell type-dependent manner. Hum Immunol 2000; 61:408-418.
34. Benham A, Tulp A, Neefjes J. Synthesis and assembly of MHC-peptide complexes. Immunol Today 1995; 16:359-362.
35. Martin WD, Hicks GG, Mendiratta SK, Leva HI, Ruley HE, Van Kaer L. H2-M mutant mice are defective in the peptide loading of class II molecules, antigen presentation and T cell repertoire selection. Cell 1996; 84:543-550.
36. Miyazaki T, Wolf P, Tourne S, Waltzinger C, Dierich A, Barois N, et al. Mice lacking H2-M complexes, enigmatic elements of the MHC class II peptideloading pathway. Cell 1996; 84:531-541.
37. Fung-Leung WP, Surh CD, Liljedahl M, Pang J, Leturcq D, Peterson PA, et al. Antigen presentation and T cell development in H2-M-deficient mice. Science 1996; 271:1278-1281.
38. Barton GM, Rudensky AY. Requirement for diverse, low-abundance peptides in positive selection of T cells. Science 1999; 283:67-70.
39. Grubin CE, Kovats S, deRoos P, Rudensky AY. Deficient positive selection of CD4 T cells in mice displaying altered repertoires of MHC class II-bound self-peptides. Immunity 1997; 7:197-208.
40. + Tcells. Immunity 1997; 7:209-19.
41. Barton GM, Rudensky AY. Evaluating peptide repertoires within the context of thymocyte development. Semin Immunol 1999; 11:417-422.
42. Kraj P, Pacholczyk R, Ignatowicz H, Kisielow P, Jensen P, Ignatowicz L. Positive selection of CD4(+) T cells is induced in vivo by agonist and inhibited by antagonist peptides. J Exp Med 2001; 194:407-416.
43. Spain LM, Jorgensen JL, Davis MM, Berg LJ. A peptide antigen antagonist prevents the differentiation of T cell receptor transgenic thymocytes. J Immunol 1994; 152:1709-1717.
44. Ebert PJ, Jiang S, Xie J, Li QJ, Davis MM. An endogenous positively selecting peptide enhances mature T cell responses and becomes an autoantigen in the absence of microRNA miR-181a. Nat Immunol 2009; 10:1162-1169.
45. + T cells. Nat Immunol 2009; 10:1155-1161.
46. Nakagawa T, Roth W, Wong P, Nelson A, Farr A, Deussing J, et al. Cathepsin L: critical role in Ii degradation and CD4 T cell selection in the thymus. Science 1998; 280:450-453.
47. + T cell selection independently of its effect on invariant chain: a role in the generation of positively selecting peptide ligands. J Exp Med 2002; 195:1349-1358.
48. Monks CR, Freiberg BA, Kupfer H, Sciaky N, Kupfer A. Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells. Nature 1998; 395:82-86.
49. Grakoui A, Bromley SK, Sumen C, Davis MM, Shaw AS, Allen PM, et al. The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. Science 1999; 285:221-227.
50. Campi G, Varma R, Dustin ML. Actin and agonist MHC-peptide complex-dependent T cell receptor microclusters as scaffolds for signaling. J Exp Med 2005; 202:1031-1036.
51. Varma R, Campi G, Yokosuka T, Saito T, Dustin ML. T cell receptor-proximal signals are sustained in peripheral microclusters and terminated in the central supramolecular activation cluster. Immunity 2006; 25:117-127.
52. Yokosuka T, Sakata-Sogawa K, Kobayashi W, Hiroshima M, Hashimoto-Tane A, Tokunaga M, et al. Newly generated T cell receptor microclusters initiate and sustain T cell activation by recruitment of Zap70 and SLP-76. Nat Immunol 2005; 6:1253-1262.
53. Bunnell SC, Hong DI, Kardon JR, Yamazaki T, McGlade CJ, Barr VA, et al. T cell receptor ligation induces the formation of dynamically regulated signaling assemblies. J Cell Biol 2002; 158:1263-1275.
54. Bunnell SC, Kapoor V, Trible RP, Zhang W, Samelson LE. Dynamic actin polymerization drives T cell receptor-induced spreading: a role for the signal transduction adaptor LAT. Immunity 2001; 14:315-329.
55. Huse M, Klein LO, Girvin AT, Faraj JM, Li QJ, Kuhns MS, et al. Spatial and temporal dynamics of T cell receptor signaling with a photoactivatable agonist. Immunity 2007; 27:76-88.
56. Cemerski S, Das J, Giurisato E, Markiewicz MA, Allen PM, Chakraborty AK, et al. The balance between T cell receptor signaling and degradation at the center of the immunological synapse is determined by antigen quality. Immunity 2008; 29:414-422.
57. Yokosuka T, Kobayashi W, Sakata-Sogawa K, Takamatsu M, Hashimoto-Tane A, Dustin ML, et al. Spatiotemporal regulation of T cell costimulation by TCR-CD28 microclusters and protein kinase C theta translocation. Immunity 2008; 29:589-601.
58. Yokosuka T, Saito T. Dynamic regulation of T-cell costimulation through TCR-CD28 microclusters. Immunol Rev 2009; 229:27-40.
59. Labrecque N, Whitfield LS, Obst R, Waltzinger C, Benoist C, Mathis D. How much TCR does a T cell need? Immunity 2001; 15:71-82.
60. Krogsgaard M, Li QJ, Sumen C, Huppa JB, Huse M, Davis MM. Agonist/endogenous peptide-MHC heterodimers drive T cell activation and sensitivity. Nature 2005; 434:238-243.
61. Li QJ, Chau J, Ebert PJ, Sylvester G, Min H, Liu G, et al. miR-181a is an intrinsic modulator of T cell sensitivity and selection. Cell 2007; 129:147-161.
62. Ebert PJ, Ehrlich LI, Davis MM. Low ligand requirement for deletion and lack of synapses in positive selection enforce the gauntlet of thymic T cell maturation. Immunity 2008; 29:734-745.
63. Hailman E, Burack WR, Shaw AS, Dustin ML, Allen PM. Immature CD4(+)CD8(+) thymocytes form a multifocal immunological synapse with sustained tyrosine phosphorylation. Immunity 2002; 16:839-848.
64. Bousso P, Bhakta NR, Lewis RS, Robey E. Dynamics of thymocyte-stromal cell interactions visualized by two-photon microscopy. Science 2002; 296:1876-1880.
65. Bhakta NR, Oh DY, Lewis RS. Calcium oscillations regulate thymocyte motility during positive selection in the three-dimensional thymic environment. Nat Immunol 2005; 6:143-151.
66. Davey GM, Schober SL, Endrizzi BT, Dutcher AK, Jameson SC, Hogquist KA. Preselection thymocytes are more sensitive to T cell receptor stimulation than mature T cells. J Exp Med 1998; 188:1867-1874.
67. Lucas B, Stefanova I, Yasutomo K, Dautigny N, Germain RN. Divergent changes in the sensitivity of maturing T cells to structurally related ligands underlies formation of a useful T cell repertoire. Immunity 1999; 10:367-376.
68. Van Laethem F, Sarafova SD, Park JH, Tai X, Pobezinsky L, Guinter TI, et al. Deletion of CD4 and CD8 coreceptors permits generation of αβ T cells that recognize antigens independently of the MHC. Immunity 2007; 27:735-750.
69. Moody AM, North SJ, Reinhold B, Van Dyken SJ, Rogers ME, Panico M, et al. Sialic acid capping of CD8β core 1-O-glycans controls thymocyte-major histocompatibility complex class I interaction. The J Biol Chem 2003; 278:7240-7246.
70. Singer A. New perspectives on a developmental dilemma: the kinetic signaling model and the importance of signal duration for the CD4/CD8 lineage decision. Curr Opin Immunol 2002; 14: 207-215.