Infant outcomes of certified nurse midwife attended home births: United States 2000 to 2004

Journal of Perinatology

Volumn 30, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 622-627

  Malloy, M H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CERTIFICATION; CHILD DEATH; CHILDBIRTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FETUS; HIGH RISK INFANT; HOME DELIVERY; HUMAN; INFANT; LIVE BIRTH; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNITY WARD; NEWBORN; NEWBORN MORTALITY; NURSE MIDWIFE; PATIENT SAFETY; UNITED STATES; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

DELIVERY ROOMS; FEMALE; HOME CHILDBIRTH; HUMANS; INFANT MORTALITY; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, NEWBORN, DISEASES; NURSE MIDWIVES; ODDS RATIO; PREGNANCY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77956263828     PISSN: 07438346     EISSN: 14765543     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/jp.2010.12     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Anderson RE, Anderson DA. The cost-effectiveness of home birth. J Nurse Midwifery 1999; 44: 30-35.
2. Henderson J, Petrou S. Economic implications of home births and birth centers: a structured review. Birth 2008; 35: 136-146.
3. Högberg U. Homebirths in a modern settingFa cautionary tale. Acta Obstet Gynecol 2008; 87: 797-799.
4. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists/Royal College of Midwives. Home births. Joint statement No. 2, April 2007, http://www.rcog.org. uk/womens-health/ clinical-guidance/home-births. Accessed February 9, 2010.
5. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Midwifery. SOCGC Policy Statement No. 12. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2003; 25(3): 239. http://www.sogc.org/guidelines/public/126E-PS-March2003.pff. Accessed February 1, 2009.
6. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ACOG statement on home births. http://www.acog.org/from-home/publications/press-releases/nr02-06-08-2. cfm. Accessed January 30, 2009.
7. Declercq ER, Paine LL, Winder MR. Home birth in the United States, 1989-1992: a longitudinal descriptive report of national birth certificate data. J Nurse Midwifery 1995; 40: 474-482.
8. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura MA, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S et al. Births: final data for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2007; 56: 1-103.
9. Schramm WF, Barnes DE, Bakewell JM. Neonatal mortality in Missouri home births, 1978-1984. Am J Public Health 1987; 77: 930-935.
10. Durand AM. The safety of home birth: the Farm study. Am J Public Health 1992; 82: 450-452.
11. Woodcock HC, Read AW, Bower C, Stanley FJ, Moore DJ. A matched cohort study of planned home and hospital births in Western Australia 1981-1987. Midwifery 1994; 10: 125-135.
12. Anderson RE, Murphy PA. Outcomes of 11 788 planned home births attended by certified nurse-midwives. J Nurse Midwifery 1995; 40: 483-492.
13. Olsen O. Meta-analysis of the safety of home birth. Birth 1997; 24: 4-13.
14. Murphy PA, Fullerton J. Outcomes of intended home births in nurse-midwifery practice: a prospective descriptive study. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 92: 461-470.
15. Janssen PA, Lee SK, Ryan EM, Etches DJ, Farquharson DF, Peacock D et al. Outcomes of planned home births versus planned hospital births after regulation of midwifery in British Columbia. CMAJ 2002; 166: 315-323.
16. Johnson KC, Daviss BA. Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America. BMJ 2005; 330(7505): 1416.
17. Amelink-Verburg MP, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, Hakkenberg RMA, Veldhuijzen IME, Gravenhorst JB, Buitendijk SE. Evaluation of 280 000 cases in Dutch midwifery practices: a descriptive study. BJOG 2008; 115: 570-578.
18. Lindgren HE, Radestad IJ, Christensson K, Hildingsson IM. Outcome of planned home births compared to hospital births in Sweden between 1992 and 2004. a populationbased register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol 2008; 87: 751-759.
19. Mori R, Dougherty M, Whittle M. An estimation of intrapartum-related perinatal mortality rates for booked home births in England and Wales between 1994 and 2003. BJOG 2008; 115: 554-559.
20. Bastian H, Deirse MJNC, Lancaster PAL. Perinatal death associated with planned home birth in Australia: population based study. BMJ 1998; 317: 384-388.
21. Pang JWY, Heffelfinger JD, Huang GJ, Benedetti TJ, Weiss NS. Outcomes of planned home births in Washington state: 1989-1996. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100: 253-259.
22. National Center for Health Statistics. United States Linked Birth/Infant Death Period Public Use Files. Years 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004. US Public Health Service: Hyattsville, MD.
23. Malloy MH. Impact of cesarean section on neonatal mortality among very preterm infants: United States 2000-2003. Pediatrics 2008; 122: 1-8.
24. SAS Institute Inc. SAS Users Guide: Statistics. version 9.1 edn. SAS Institute Inc: Cary, NC, 2002.
25. Young D. Home birth in the United States: action and reaction. Birth 2008; 35: 263-265.
26. Anthony S, Buitendijk SE, Offerhaus PM, van Dommelen P, van der Pal-de Bruin KM. Maternal factors and the probability of a planned home birth. BJOG 2005; 112: 748-753.
27. Hildingsson IM, Lindgren HE, Haglund B, Radestad IJ. Characteristics of women giving birth at home in Sweden: a national register study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195(5): 1366-1372.
28. MacDorman MF, Declercq E, Menacker F, Malloy MH. Infant and neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to women with "no indicated risk," United States, 1998-2001 birth cohorts. Birth 2006; 33: 175-182.
29. Burnett CL, Jones JA, Rooks J, Chen CH, Tyler CW, Miller CA. Home delivery and neonatal mortality in North Carolina. JAMA 1980; 244: 2741-2745.
30. Freeman MA, Gay GA, Brokert JE, Potrzebowski PW, Rothwell CJ. The 1989 revisions of the US standard certificates of livebirth and death and the US standard report of fetal death. Am J Public Health 1988; 78: 168-172.
31. Buescher PA, Taylor KP, Davis MH, Bowling JM. The quality of the new birth certificate data: a validation study in North Carolina. Am J Public Health 1993; 83: 1163-1165.
32. Lydon-Rochelle MT, Holt VL, Cardenas V, Nelson JC, Easterling TR, Gardella C et al. The reporting of pre-existing maternal medical conditions and complications of pregnancy on birth certificates and in hospital discharge data. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 125-134.