The Family Reunification Directive: A Tool Preserving Member State Interest or Conducive to Family Unity?

Whose Freedom, Security and Justice?: EU Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 451-488

  Oosterom Staples, Helen ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956259541     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (8)

1. J Handoll, Free Movement of Persons in the EU (Chichester, Wiley, 1995) 646–8.
2. P Boeles, ‘Directive on Family Reunion: Are the Dilemmas Resolved?’ (2001) 3 European Journal on Migration and Law 61
3. G Brinkmann, ‘Family Reunion, Third Country Nationals and the Community’s New Powers’, in E Guild and C Harlow (eds), Implementing Amsterdam: Immigration and Asylum Rights in EC Law (Oxford, Hart, 2001) 241, at 252–63
4. H Staples, ‘Wie is familielid volgens het Europees recht?’ (2000–4) 22 Tijdschrift voor Familie- en Jeugdrecht 82, at 86–9
5. Cholewinski, ‘Family Reunion and Conditions Placed on Family Members: Dismantling a Fundamental Human Right’ (2002) 4 European Journal on Migration and Law 271.
6. H Battjes and T Spijkerboer, ‘The Systematic Nature of the Common European Asylum System’ in F Julien-Laferrière et al (eds), The European Immigration and Asylum Policy: Critical Assessment Five Years after the Amsterdam Treaty (Brussels, Bruylant, 2005) 276.
7. S Peers, ‘Family Reunion and Community Law’, in N Walker (ed), Europe’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (Oxford, OUP, 2004) 180.
8. P Boeles and G Lodder, Commentaar Europees Migratierecht. Richtlijn 2003/86/EG artikel 4 (The Hague, SDU, 2006).