Comparing ordinary kriging and regression kriging for soil properties in contrasting landscapes

Pedosphere

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 594-606

  Zhu, Q ^a   Lin, H S ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Geostatistics; Soil moisture; Spatial interpolation; Spatial structure

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; AGRICULTURAL SOIL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FORESTED CATCHMENT; GEOSTATISTICS; INTERPOLATION; KRIGING; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOIL DEPTH; SOIL MOISTURE; SOIL PROPERTY; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 77956256282     PISSN: 10020160     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1002-0160(10)60049-5     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ahmed S., De Marsily G. Comparison of geostatistical methods for estimating transmissivity using data on transmissivity and specific capacity. Water Resour. Res. 1987, 23:1717-1737.
2. Bárdossy A., Lehmann W. Spatial distribution of soil moisture in a small catchment. Part 1: geostatistical analysis. J. Hydrol. 1998, 206:1-15.
3. Bishop T.F.A., McBratney A.B. A comparison of prediction methods for the creation of field-extent soil property maps. Geoderma. 2001, 103:149-160.
4. Bourennane H., King D., Couturier A. Comparison of kriging with external drift and simple linear regression for predicting soil horizon thickness with different sample densities. Geoderma. 2000, 97:255-271.
5. Cambardella C.A., Karlen D.L. Spatial analysis of soil fertility parameters. Precis. Agric. 1999, 1:5-14.
6. Ersahin S. Comparing ordinary kriging and cokriging to estimate infiltration rate. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2003, 67:1848-1855.
7. Grego C.R., Vieira S.R., Antonio A.M., Rosa S.C.D. Geostatistical analysis for soil moisture content under the no tillage cropping system. Sci. Agr. 2006, 63:341-350.
8. Hengl T., Heuvelink G.B.M., Rossiter D.G. About regression-kriging: From equations to case studies. Comput. Geosci. 2007, 33:1301-1315.
9. Hosseini E., Gallichand J., Marcotte D. Theoretical and experimental performance of spatial interpolation methods for soil salinity analysis. T. ASAE. 1994, 37:1799-1807.
10. Kerry R., Oliver M.A. Comparing sampling needs for variograms of soil properties computed by the method of moments and residual maximum likelihood. Geoderma. 2007, 140:383-396.
11. Knotters M., Brus D.J., Oude Voshaar J.H. A comparison of kriging, co-kriging and kriging combined with regression for spatial interpolation of horizon depth with censored observations. Geoderma. 1995, 67:227-246.
12. Kravchenko A.N. Influence of spatial structure on accuracy of interpolation methods. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2003, 67:1564-1571.
13. Kravchenko A.N., Bullock D.G. A comparative study of interpolation methods for mapping soil properties. Agron. J. 1999, 91:393-400.
14. Kravchenko A.N., Robertson G.P. Can topographical and yield data substantially improve total soil carbon mapping by regression kriging?. Agron. J. 2007, 99:12-17.
15. Laslett G.M. Kriging and splines: An empirical comparison of their predictive performance in some applications. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1994, 89:391-409.
16. Leenaers H., Okx J.P., Burrough P.A. Comparison of spatial prediction methods for mapping floodplain soil pollution. Catena. 1990, 17:535-550.
17. Lin H.S., Kogelmann W., Walker C., Bruns M.A. Soil moisture patterns in a forested catchment: A hydropedological perspective. Geoderma. 2006, 131:345-368.
18. Lin H.S., Wheeler D., Bell J., Wilding L. Assessment of soil spatial variability at multiple scales. Ecol. Model. 2005, 182:271-290.
19. Mueller T.G., Pierce F.J., Schabenberger O., Warncke D.D. Map quality for site-specific fertility management. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2004, 65:1547-1558.
20. Perry M.A., Niemann J.D. Generation of soil moisture patterns at the catchment scale by EOF interpolation. Hydrol. Earth. Syst. Sci. 2008, 12:39-53.
21. Robinson T.P., Metternicht G. Testing the performance of spatial interpolation techniques for mapping soil properties. Comput. Electron. Agr. 2006, 50:97-108.
22. Sadler E.J., Busscher W.J., Bauer P.J., Karlen D.L. Spatial scale requirements for precision farming: A case study in the southeastern USA. Agron. J. 1998, 90:191-197.
23. Sawyer J.E. Concepts of variable rate technology with considerations for fertilizer application. J. Prod. Agric. 1994, 7:195-201.
24. Sawyer R. Sample size and the accuracy of predictions made from multiple regression equations. J. Educ. Stat. 1982, 7:91-104.
25. Schloeder C.A., Zimmerman N.E., Jacobs M.J. Comparison of methods for interpolating soil properties using limited data. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2001, 65:470-479.
26. Shi Z., Wang K., Bailey J.S., Jordan C., Higgins A.J. Sampling strategies for mapping soil phosphorus and soil potassium distribution in cool temperate grassland. Precis Agric. 2000, 2:347-357.
27. Snepvangers J.J.J.C., Heuvelink G.B.M., Huisman J.A. Soil water content interpolation using spatial-temporal kriging with external drift. Geoderma. 2003, 112:253-271.
28. Viscarra-Rossel R.A., McBratney A.B. Soil chemical analytical accuracy and costs: Implications from precision agriculture. Aust. J. Exp. Agr. 1998, 38:765-775.
29. Voltz M., Webster R. A comparison of kriging, cubic splines and classification for predicting soil properties from sample information. J. Soil. Sci. 1990, 41:473-490.
30. Webster R., Oliver M.A. Sample adequately to estimate variograms of soil properties. J. Soil. Sci. 1992, 43:177-192.
31. Western A.W., Blöschl G. On the spatial scaling of soil moisture. J. Hydrol. 1999, 217:203-224.
32. Western A.W., Grayson R.B., Blöschl G., Willgoose G.R.,, McMahon T.A. Observed spatial organization of soil moisture and its relation to terrain indices. Water Resour. Res. 1999, 35:797-810.
33. Wollenhaupt N.C., Wolkowski R.P., Clayton M.K. Mapping soil test phosphorus and potassium for variable-rate fertilizer application. J. Prod. Agric. 1994, 7:441-448.
34. Zhu Q., Lin H.S., Doolittle J.A. Repeated electromagnetic induction surveys for improved soil mapping in an agricultural landscape. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2010, 10.2136/sssaj2010.0056.
35. Zhu Q., Lin H.S., Doolittle J.A. Repeated electromagnetic induction surveys for determining subsurface hydrologic dynamics in an agricultural landscape. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2010, 10.2136/sssaj2010.0055.