Daily scale modelling of aquifer-river connectivity in the urban alluvial aquifer in Langreo, Spain;Modélisation á échelle journaliére des interactions entre la riviére et l'aquifére urbain de Langreo, Espagne

Hydrogeology Journal

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1525-1537

  Martínez Santos, Pedro ^a   Martínez Alfaro, Pedro E ^a   Sanz, Eugenio ^b   Galindo, Angel ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Groundwater recharge water budget; Groundwater surface water relations; Numerical modeling; Spain; Urban groundwater

Indexed keywords

AQUIFER; BASEFLOW; CALIBRATION; CATCHMENT; CONNECTIVITY; GROUNDWATER FLOW; GROUNDWATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTION; INSTREAM FLOW; NUMERICAL MODEL; RECHARGE; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPATIAL VARIATION; TEMPORAL VARIATION; WATER BUDGET;

SPAIN;

EID: 77956251570     PISSN: 14312174     EISSN: 14350157     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-010-0613-1     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bauer S, Bayer-Raich M, Holder T, Kolesar C, Müller D, Ptak T (2004) Quantification of groundwater contamination in an urban area using integral pumping tests. J Contam Hydrol 75(3-4): 183-213.
2. Bernaldez FG, Rey Benayas JM, Martínez A (1993) Ecological impact of groundwater extraction on wetlands (Douro basin, Spain). J Hydrol 141(1-4): 219-238.
3. Brodie RS, Hostetler S, Slatter E (2007) Comparison of daily percentiles of streamflow and rainfall to investigate stream-aquifer connectivity. J Hydrol 349: 56-67.
4. Castaño S, Martínez-Santos P, Martínez-Alfaro PE (2008) Evaluating infiltration losses in a Mediterranean wetland: Las Tablas de Daimiel National Park, Spain. Hydrol Process. doi: 10. 1002/hyp. 7124.
5. Chiang HW (2005) 3D Groundwater modelling with PMWIN, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, 411 pp.
6. Chiang HW, Kinzelbach W (2001) 3D-Groundwater modeling with PMWIN. Springer, Berlin.
7. CHT (2009) Modelo matemático para la evaluación de la relación acuífero-río en el entorno del acuífero terciario detrítico de Madrid [A numerical model to evaluate aquifer-river connectivity in Madrid's Tertiary Detrital Aquifer]. Technical report, Confederación Hidrográfica del Tajo, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid, 120 pp.
8. Conrad LP, Beljin MS (1996) Evaluation of an induced infiltration model as applied to glacial aquifer systems. Water Resour Bull 32(6): 1209-1220.
9. Constantz J, Stonestrom D, Stewart AE, Niswonger R, Smith TR (2001) Analysis of streambed temperatures in ephemeral channels to determine streamflow frequency and duration. Water Resour Res 37(2): 317-328.
10. Cressie NAC (1990) The origins of kriging. Math Geol 22: 239-252.
11. Ellis PA, Mackay R, Rivett MO (2007) Quantifying urban river-aquifer fluid exchange processes: a multi-scale problem. J Contam Hydrol 91: 58-80.
12. Epting J, Huggenberger P, Rauber M (2008) Integrated methods and scenario development for urban groundwater management and protection during tunnel road construction: a case study of urban hydrogeology in the City of Basel, Switzerland. Hydrogeol J 16(3): 575-591.
13. Foster SSD, Chilton PJ (2004) Downstream of downtown: urban wastewater as groundwater recharge. Hydrogeol J 12(1): 115-120.
14. Grischek T, Nestler W, Piechniczek D, Fischer T (1996) Urban groundwater in Dresden, Germany. Hydrogeol J 4(1): 48-63.
15. Horton RE (1933) The role of infiltration in the hydrological cycle. Trans Am Geophys Union 14: 446-460.
16. Howard KWF, Eyles N, Livingstone S (1996) Municipal landfilling practice and its impact on groundwater resources in and around urban Toronto, Canada. Hydrogeol J 4(1): 64-74.
17. INGE (2008) Caracterización hidrogeológica del aluvial del río Nalón y análisis de la influencia de las obras de soterramiento de las vías de FEVE en Langreo [Hydrogeological characterization of the Nalon alluvial aquifer and evaluation of its potential significance for Langreo's railway tunnel]. Technical report, Instrumentación Geotécnica y Estructural Ltd., Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Ordenación del Territorio e Infraestructuras, Gobierno del Principado de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain, 17 pp.
18. Ivkovic KM (2009) A top-down approach to characterise aquifer-river interaction processes. J Hydrol 365: 145-155.
19. Jusseret S, Tam VT, Dassargues A (2009) Groundwater flow modelling in the central zone of Hanoi, Vietnam. Hydrogeol J 17(4): 915-934.
20. Kalbus E, Reinstorf F, Schirmer M (2006) Measuring methods for groundwater-surface water interactions: a review. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 10(6): 873-887.
21. Kelly SE, Murdoch LC (2003) Measuring the hydraulic conductivity of shallow submerged sediments. Ground Water 41(4): 431-439.
22. Kim YY, Lee KK, Sung I (2001) Urbanization and the groundwater budget, metropolitan Seoul area, Korea. Hydrogeol J 9(4): 401-412.
23. Landon MK, Rus DL, Harvey FE (2001) Comparison of instream methods for measuring hydraulic conductivity in sandy streambeds. Ground Water 39(6): 870-885.
24. Lerner DN (2002) Identifying and quantifying urban recharge: a review. Hydrogeol J 10(1): 143-15.
25. Llamas MR (1988) Conflicts between wetland conservation and groundwater exploitation: two case histories in Spain. Environ Geol Water Sci 11(3): 241-251.
26. Marcos LA, Castaño S, Moreno L, Vázquez M (2006). La hidrogeología en acuíferos urbanos: un reto en la gestión sostenible del agua en las ciudades: el caso de Burgos [Urban hydrogeology as a challenge for sustainable water management in cities: the case of Burgos]. VIII Congreso de Nacional de Medio Ambiente (CONAMA), Madrid, November 2006.
27. Martínez-Santos P, Llamas MR, Martínez-Alfaro PE (2008) Vulnerability assessment of groundwater resources: a modelling-based approach to the Mancha Occidental aquifer, Spain. Environ Model Soft 23(9): 1145-1162.
28. McDonald MG, Harbaugh AW (1988) MODFLOW, A modular three-dimensional finite difference ground-water flow model. US Geol Surv Open-File Rep 83-875, Chap. A1.
29. Meriano M, Eyles N (2003) Groundwater flow through Pleistocene glacial deposits in the rapidly urbanizing Rouge River-Highland Creek watershed, City of Scarborough, southern Ontario, Canada. Hydrogeol J 11(2): 288-303.
30. Meyer SC (2005) Analysis of base flow trends in urban streams, northeastern Illinois, USA. Hydrogeol J 13(5-6): 871-885.
31. Morris BL, Darling WG, Gooddy DC, Litvak RG, Neumann I, Nemaltseva EJ, Poddubnaia I (2006) Assessing the extent of induced leakage to an urban aquifer using environmental tracers: an example from Bishkek, capital of Kyrgyzstan, Central Asia. Hydrgeol J 14(1-2): 225-243.
32. OHL (2009) Estudio de modelización hidrogeológica para el análisis del soterramiento de vías de FEVE en el aluvial del Nalón (casco urbano de Langreo) [Groundwater modelling studies of the Langreo railway tunnel]. Technical report, Obrascon-Huarte-Lain, Oviedo, Spain, 77 pp.
33. Refsgaard JC, Henriksen HJ, Harrar WG, Scholten H, Kassahun A (2005) Quality assurance in model based water management: review of existing practice and outline of new approaches. Environ Model Softw 20(2005): 1201-1215.
34. Reinstorf F, Leschik S, Musolff A, Osenbrück K, Strauch G, Möder M, Schirmer M (2009) Quantification of large-scale urban mass fluxes of xenobiotics and of the river-groundwater interaction in the City of Halle, Germany. Phys Chem Earth 34: 574-579.
35. Rodríguez LB, Cello PA, Vionnet CA (2006) (2006) Modeling stream-aquifer interactions in a shallow aquifer, Choele Choel Island, Patagonia, Argentina. Hydrogeol J 14: 591-602.
36. Samper J, Zheng L, Bonilla M, Yang C, Martínez Alfaro PE, Martínez-Santos P, Molinero J, Melis M (2006) Evaluación del efecto del soterramiento de la M-30 sobre la hidrología del subsuelo de Madrid mediante modelos tridimensionales de flujo [Evaluating the effect of the M-30 tunnels on Madrid's hydrogeological conditions by means of 3D numerical models]. Equip Serv Muni 128: 74-84.
37. Samper J, Martínez-Alfaro PE, Molinero J, Martínez-Santos P, Zheng L, Bonilla M, Yang C, Melis M (2007) Impact of burial of M30 highway in the subsurface hydrology of Madrid near Manzanares river: Evaluation with 3D numerical models. XXXV IAH Congress: Groundwater and ecosystems, Lisbon, 17-21 September 2007.
38. Sanford W (2002) Recharge and groundwater models: an overview. Hydrogeol J 10(1): 110-120.
39. Scanlon BR, Healy RW, Cook PG (2002) Choosing appropriate techniques to estimate groundwater recharge. Hydrogeol J 10(1): 18-39.
40. Sophocleous M (2002) Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science. Hydrogeol J 10(1): 52-67.
41. Sophocleous M, Koussis A, Martin JL, Perkins SP (1995) Evaluation of simplified stream-aquifer depletion models for water rights administration. Ground Water 33(4): 579-588.
42. Theis CV (1935) The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using groundwater storage. Trans Am Geophys Union 16: 519-524.
43. TI-IAC (2006) Estudio Geotécnico, Geológico, Cartográfico y Topográfico correspondiente a las obras de soterramiento de vías FEVE en Langreo y urbanización de los terrenos liberados [Geological, geotechnical, cartographic and topographic studies for the Langreo railway tunnel]. Technical report, Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Ordenación del Territorio e Infraestructuras, Gobierno del Principado de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
44. Vázquez-Suñé E, Sánchez-Vila X, Carrera J (2005) Introductory review of specific factors influencing urban groundwater, an emerging branch of hydrogeology, with reference to Barcelona, Spain. Hydrogeol J 13(3): 522-533.
45. Winter TC (1999) Relations of stream, lakes and wetlands to groundwater flow system. Hydrogeol J 7(1): 28-45.
46. Yang Y, Lerner DN, Barrett MH, Tellam JH (1999) Quantification of groundwater recharge in the City of Nottingham, UK. Environ Geol 38(3): 183-198.
47. Zume J, Tarhule A (2008) Simulating the impacts of groundwater pumping on stream-aquifer dynamics in semiarid northwestern Oklahoma, USA. Hydrogeol J 16: 797-810.