Effectiveness of daylighting design and occupant visual satisfaction in a LEED Gold laboratory building

Building and Environment

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 54-64

  Hua, Ying ^a   Oswald, Anne ^a   Yang, Xiaodi ^b  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Daylighting; Laboratory; Occupant visual satisfaction; Post occupancy study; User control; Visual environment

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL LIGHTING; BUILDING ENERGY; CONTINUOUS DATA; DAYLIGHTING DESIGN; FISH-EYE; ILLUMINANCE MEASUREMENT; INDOOR ENVIRONMENT QUALITY; LABORATORY BUILDINGS; OCCUPANT CONTROL; OCCUPANT VISUAL SATISFACTION; POSITIVE EFFECTS; POST-OCCUPANCY STUDY; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; UNIVERSITY CAMPUS; USER BEHAVIORS; USER CONTROL; VISUAL ENVIRONMENTS; WORK ENVIRONMENTS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BUILDINGS; DESIGN; ELECTRIC LIGHTING; ENERGY MANAGEMENT; HUMAN ENGINEERING; LABORATORIES; LIGHT SOURCES; SURVEYS;

DAYLIGHTING;

AIR QUALITY; ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; BUILDING; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; ENERGY USE; INDOOR AIR; LIGHT ATTENUATION; LIGHT AVAILABILITY; LIGHT EFFECT;

EID: 77956229579     PISSN: 03601323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.06.016     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. US Department of Energy Buildings energy data Book 2009.
2. US Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Outlook 2006.
3. Kristensen PE. Efficient use of daylight in commercial buildings. In: Proceedings of right light bright light, Stockholm, Sweden; 1991.
4. Allen R. Pennsylvania power and light: a lighting case study. Buildings March 1982, 76:49-56.
5. Heerwagen J.H., Zagreus L. The human factors of sustainable building design: post occupancy evaluation of the Philip Merrill environmental Center 2005, Center for the Built environment: University of California, Berkeley, Retrieved November 15, 2009, from. http://repositories.cdlib.org/cedr/cbe/ieq/SR_CBF_2005/.
6. Veitch J.A., Gifford R. Assessing beliefs about lighting effects on health, performance, mood, and social behavior. Environment and Behavior 1996, 28:446-470.
7. Abdou O.A. Effects of luminous environment on worker productivity in building spaces. Journal of Architectural Engineering 1997, 3(3):124-132.
8. Heschong Mahone Group Windows and offices: a study of worker performance and the indoor environment (technical report), for the California 2003, Energy Commission.
9. Abbaszadeh S, Zagreus L, Lehrer D, Huizenga C. Occupant satisfaction with indoor environment quality in green buildings. In: proceedings of healthy buildings, Lisbon, III; 2006. p. 365-70.
10. Doulos L, Tsangrassoulis A, Topalis FV. Evaluation of daylighting in office buildings. In: proceedings of the fifth WSEAS international conference on environment, ecosystems and development, Tenerife, Spain; 2007.
11. Heerwagen J, Diamond RC. Adaptations and coping: occupant response to discomfort in energy efficient buildings. In: proceedings of ACEEE 1992 summer study on energy efficiency in buildings, vol. 10, Berkeley, CA: ACEEE,; 1992. p. 10.83-10.90.
12. Doulos L, Tsangrassoulis A, Topalis FV. Evaluation of lighting controls in office buildings. In: proceedings of the sixth WSEAS international conference on circuits, systems, electronics, control & signal processing, Cairo, Egypt; 2007.
13. US Energy Information Administration. Post occupancy evaluation of daylight in buildings, IEA SHC TASK 21/ECBCS ANNEX 29; December 1999.
14. Edwards L., Torcellini P. A literature review of the effects of natural light on building occupants 2002, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL/TP-550-30769.