Comparison of flex-center, center, and corner methods of corneal endothelial cell analysis

Cornea

Volumn 29, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1042-1047

  Patel, Sanjay V ^a   McLaren, Jay W ^a   Bachman, Lori A ^a   Bourne, William M ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

corneal endothelium; image analysis; specular microscopy

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CELL DENSITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA CELL; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; HUMAN; OPTOMETRY; PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; CELL COUNT; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CORNEA ENDOTHELIUM; CORNEAL DISEASES; CORNEAL ENDOTHELIAL CELL LOSS; CYTOLOGY; IMAGE PROCESSING; PATHOLOGY; PHOTOGRAPHY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CELL COUNT; CORNEAL DISEASES; CORNEAL ENDOTHELIAL CELL LOSS; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; ENDOTHELIUM, CORNEAL; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KERATOPLASTY, PENETRATING; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; PHOTOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77956225218     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181cc7a60     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Benetz BA, Gal RL, Ruedy KJ, et al. Specular microscopy ancillary study methods for donor endothelial cell density determination of Cornea Donor Study images. Curr Eye Res. 2006;31:319-327.
2. Patel SV, Erie JC, McLaren JW, et al. Keratocyte density and recovery of subbasal nerves after penetrating keratoplasty and in late endothelial failure. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125:1693-1698.
3. Patel SV, Winter EJ, McLaren JW, et al. Objective measurement of backscattered light from the anterior and posterior cornea in vivo. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:166-172.
4. McCarey BE, Edelhauser HF, Lynn MJ. Review of corneal endothelial specular microscopy for FDA clinical trials of refractive procedures, surgical devices, and new intraocular drugs and solutions. Cornea. 2008; 27:1-16.
5. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310.
6. Benetz BA, Diaconu E, Bowlin SJ, et al. Comparison of corneal endothelial image analysis by Konan SP8000 noncontact and Bio-Optics Bambi systems. Cornea. 1999;18:67-72.
7. Laing RA, Sanstrom MM, Berrospi AR, et al. Changes in the corneal endothelium as a function of age. Exp Eye Res. 1976;22:587-594.
8. Bourne WM, Nelson LR, Hodge DO. Central corneal endothelial cell changes over a ten-year period. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38: 779-782.
9. Patel SV, Hodge DO, Bourne WM. Corneal endothelium and postoperative outcomes 15 years after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:311-319.
10. Ohno K, Nelson LR, McLaren JW, et al. Comparison of recording systems and analysis methods in specular microscopy. Cornea. 1999;18:416-423.
11. de Sanctis U, Machetta F, Razzano L, et al. Corneal endothelium evaluation with 2 noncontact specular microscopes and their semi-automated methods of analysis. Cornea. 2006;25:501-506.
12. Bergmanson JP. Histopathological analysis of corneal endothelial polymegethism. Cornea. 1992;11:133-142.
13. Patel SV, Diehl NN, Hodge DO, et al. Donor risk factors for graft failure in a 20-year study of penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128: 418-425.