Extracorporeal gastric stapling reduces the incidence of gastric conduit failure after minimally invasive esophagectomy

American Surgeon

Volumn 76, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 823-828

  Crenshaw, Gregory D ^a   Shankar, Suven S ^a   Brown, Russell E ^a   Abbas, Abbas E ^a   Bolton, John S ^a  

^a OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESOPHAGUS RESECTION; EXTRACORPOREAL GASTRIC STAPLING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MORBIDITY; NECROSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL STAPLING; TREATMENT FAILURE; ANASTOMOSIS; ESOPHAGUS TUMOR; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; STOMACH; STOMACH TUMOR;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; ESOPHAGECTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STOMACH; STOMACH NEOPLASMS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; SURGICAL STAPLING;

EID: 77956220663     PISSN: 00031348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1128-37.
2. Rizk NP, Bach PB, Schrag D, et al. The impact of complications on outcomes after resection for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2004;198:42-50.
3. Atkins BZ, Shah AS, Hutcheson KA, et al. Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:1170-6, discussion 1170-6.
4. Luketich JD, Nguyen NT,Weigel T, et al. Minimally invasive approach to esophagectomy. JSLS 1998;2:243-7.
5. Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 2003;238:486-94, discussion 494-5.
6. Bizekis C, Kent MS, Luketich JD, et al. Initial experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:402-6, discussion 406-7.
7. Nguyen NT, Hinojsa MW, Smith BR, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations. Ann Surg 2008;248:1081-91.
8. Berrisford RG, Wajed SA, Sanders D, et al. Short-term outcomes following total minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 2008;95:602-10.
9. Decker G, Coosemans W, De Leyn P, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;35:13-20, discussion 20-1.
10. Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A, et al. Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2010;Jan 28. Epub ahead of print. PubMed PMID: 20108155.
11. Verhage RJ, Hazebroek EJ, Boone J, et al. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Chir 2009;64:135-46, PubMed PMID: 19365314.
12. Biere SS, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Chir 2009;64:121-33, PubMed PMID: 19365313.
13. Rindani R, Martin CJ, Cox MR. Transhiatal versus Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy: is there a difference? Aust N Z J Surg 1999;69:187-94.
14. Hulscher JB, Tijssen JG, Obertop H, et al. Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:306-13.