Societal perceptions of physicians: Knights, knaves, or pawns?

JAMA

Volumn 304, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1009-1010

  Jain, Sachin H ^a   Cassel, Christine K ^b  

^a Department of Health and Human Services   (United States)

^b AMERICAN BOARD OF INTERNAL MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; NOTE; PERCEPTION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC OPINION; TRUST; UNITED STATES; ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL STATUS;

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HEALTH POLICY; MOTIVATION; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE; POLICY MAKING; PUBLIC OPINION; SOCIAL CONDITIONS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77956213562     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1250     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Le Grand J. Motivation, Agency, and Public Policy: Of Knights, Knaves, Pawns & Queens. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2003.
2. Choudhry NK, Fletcher RH, Soumerai SB. Systematic review: the relationship between clinical experience and quality of health care. Ann Intern Med. 2005; 142(4):260-273.
3. Committee on Quality and Health Care in America; Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
4. McClellan M, McKethan AN, Lewis JL, Roski J, Fisher ES. A national strategy to put accountable care into practice. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(5):982-990.
5. Enthoven AC, Tollen LA. Toward a 21st Century Health System: The Contributions and Promise of Prepaid Group Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2004.