Post-Occupancy evaluation of space use in a dwelling using rfid tracking

Architectural Engineering and Design Management

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 273-288

  Gillott, Mark ^a   Holland, Richard ^a   Riffat, Saffa ^a   Fitchett, James A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Efficiency; Housing; POE; Post occupancy evaluation; Radio frequency identification; RFID; Space

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956213523     PISSN: 17452007     EISSN: 17527589     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17452007.2006.9684622     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Asquith, L., 2003. Space Use and Claim:An Evolution of the Domestic Spatial Arrangement in Family Homes PhD thesis, School of Architecture, Oxford Brookes University
2. Axcess Inc. Track, Monitor & Protect People, Assets & Vehicles 2006,www.axcessinc.com (accessed 29 August 2006)
3. Balakrishnan, H., Baliga, R., Curtis, D., Goraczko, M., Miu, A., Priyantha, B., Smith, A., Steele, K., Teller, S., and Wang, K., Lessons from Developing and Deploying the Cricket Indoor Location System MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL). 2003,http://nms.lcs.mit.edu/ projects/cricket/#overview (accessed 29 August 2006)
4. Barker, K., 2004. Review of Housing Supply:Delivering Stability:Securing our Future Housing Needs London:TSO.
5. Blythe, M., and Monk, A., 2002. “ ‘Notes towards an ethnography of domestic technology’ ”. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, London, June 2002 277–281. New York:ACM Press.
6. Building Research Establishment. 2002. “ P16/02:”. In Electronic Tagging and Wireless Applications Garston:BRE.
7. Building Research Establishment. 2003. “ IP 13/03:”. In Sustainable Buildings:the Benefits for Occupiers Garston:BRE.
8. Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment. 2004. The Impact of Office Design on Business Performance London:CABE Publications.
9. Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment. 2005. What's it Like to Live There:The Views of Residents on the Design of New Housing 28London:CABE Publications.
10. Crabtree, A., and Rodden, T., 2004. ‘Domestic routines and design for the home’. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 13 (2):191–220.
11. Csikszentmihalyi, M., and Rochberg-Halton, E., 1981. The Meaning of Things:Domestic Symbols and the Self, Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
12. David Wilson Homes. 2006. The Project:LIFE Research Study—Shaping Homes of the Future Ibstock:DWH Publications.
13. Duke University. 2006. “ RFID ”. In Technology Project www.smarthouse.duke.edu/ projects/rfid_tech.php (accessed 29 August 2006)
14. Fisk, W., 2000. “ ‘Health and productivity gains from better indoor environments and their relationship with building energy efficiency’ ”. In Annual Review of Energy and the Environment November 2000 Vol. 25, 537–66. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.537
15. Gatekeeper Systems. 2006. Abolish Cart Loss with Gatekeeper Systems www.gatekeepersystems.com/index.html (accessed 29 August 2006)
16. Georgia Institute of Technology. 2006. Aware Home Research Institute www-static.cc.gatech.edu/fce/ahri/ (accessed 29 August 2006)
17. Harter, A., and Hopper, A., 1994. ‘A distributed location system for the active office’. IEEE Network, 8 (1):62–70.
18. Hightower, J., and Borriello, G., 2001. “ ‘Location systems for UbiComp’ ”. In Computer Vol. 34, 57–66. IEEE Computer Society Press. (8)
19. Holland, R., 2006. The Experimental Application of an Occupant Tracking Technology for Domestic Post-Occupancy Evaluation PhD Thesis, School of the Built Environment, University of Nottingham
20. Intille, S., Tapia, E. M., Rondoni, J., Beaudin, J., Kukla, C., Agarwal, S., Bao, L., and Larson, K., 2003. “ ‘Tools for studying behavior and technology in natural settings’ ”. In Proceedings of UbiComp 2003, Seattle, October 2003 157–174. Berlin:Springer-Verlag.
21. Jaunzens, D., Grigg, P., Cohen, R., Watson, M., and Picton, E., 2003. Digest 478:Building Performance Feedback:Getting Started Garston:BRE.
22. Leaman, A., 2004. “ ‘Post-Occupancy Evaluation’ ”. In Closing the Loop:Benchmarks for Sustainable Buildings Edited by:Roaf, S., 491–518. London:RIBA Enterprises.
23. Leishman, C., Aspinall, P., Munro, M., and Warren, F., 2004. Preferences, Quality and Choice in New-build Housing York:Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
24. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 2006. House_n Introduction http://architecture.mit.edu/house_n/intro.html (accessed 29 August 2006)
25. Office for National Statistics. 2006. Social Trends 36 146–160. London:HMSO.
26. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. 2005. The Government's Response to Kate Barker's Review of Housing Supply London:HMSO.
27. Robinson, J. P., 1988. “ as cited ”. In Inside the Smart Home Edited by:Harper, R., London:Springer-Verlag. 2003, 128
28. School of the Built Environment. 2006. David Wilson Homes Millennium Eco-House University of Nottingham. www.nottingham.ac.uk/sbe (accessed 29 August 2006)
29. Smith, P., 2001. “ ‘Occupancy costs’ ”. In Sustainable Practices in the Built Environment, 2nd edn Edited by:Langston, C., and Ding, G., 230–248. Heinemann. Oxford, Butterworth–
30. University of Colorado. 2006. The Adaptive House www.cs.colorado.edu/%7Emozer/house/ (accessed 29 August 2006)
31. Wavetrend Technologies. 2006. “ RFID— ”. In Key to Personnel Visibility www.wavetrend.net (accessed 29 August 2006)