Changes in kit fox defecation patterns during the reproductive season: Implications for noninvasive surveys

Journal of Wildlife Management

Volumn 74, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1457-1462

  Ralls, Katherine ^a   Sharma, Sandeep ^a   Smith, Deborah A ^b   Bremner Harrison, Samantha ^c   Cypher, Brian L ^c   Maldonado, Jess E ^a  

^a SMITHSONIAN CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Working Dogs for Conservation   (United States)

^c CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

capture heterogeneity; feces; kit fox; noninvasive surveys; scat; sex ratio; Vulpes macrotis; zinc finger protein gene

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY PATTERN; BREEDING SEASON; CANID; CARNIVORE; FECES; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HETEROGENEITY; HOME RANGE; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; POPULATION SIZE; PROTEIN; RELATIVE ABUNDANCE; SEX DETERMINATION; SEX RATIO;

CANIDAE; CANIS FAMILIARIS; VULPES; VULPES MACROTIS;

EID: 77956212419     PISSN: 0022541X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2193/2009-401     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Allardyce, D., and M. A. Sovada. 2003. A review of the ecology, distribution, and status of swift foxes in the United States. Pages 3-18 in M. A. Sovada and L. Carbyn, editors. The swift fox: ecology and conservation of swift foxes in a changing world. Canadian Plains Research Center, Regina, Canada.
2. Bellemain, E., J. E. Swenson, D. Tallmon, S. Brunberg, and P. Taberlet. 2005. Estimating population size of elusive animals with DNA from hunter-collected feces: four methods for brown bears. Conservation Biology 19:150-161.
3. Cubaynes, S., R. Pradel, R. Choquet, C. Duchamp,J. Gaillard, J. Lebreton, E. Marboutin, C. Miquel, A. Reboulet, C. Poillot, P. Taberlet, and O. Gomenez. 2010. Importance of accounting for detection heterogeneity when estimating abundance: the case of French wolves. Conservation Biology 24:621-626.
4. Cypher, B. L., G. D. Warrick, M. R. M. Otten, T. P. O'Farrell, W. H. Berry, C. E. Harris, T. T. Kato, P. M. McCue, J. H. Scrivner, and B. W Zoellick. 2000. Population dynamics of San Joaquin kit foxes at the Naval Petroleum Reserves in California. Wildlife Monographs 145.
5. Eggert, L. S., J. E. Maldonado, and R. C. Fleischer. 2005. Nucleic acid isolation from ecological samples: animal scat and other associated materials. Methods in Enzymology 395:73-87.
6. Egoscue, H. J. 1956. Preliminary studies of the kit fox in Utah. Journal of Mammalogy 37:351-357.
7. Frantz, A. C., L. C. Pope, P. J. Carpenter, T. J. Roper, G. J. Wilson, and R. J. Delahay. 2003. Reliable microsatellite genotyping of the Eurasian badger (Meles meles) using faecal DNA. Molecular Ecology 12:1649-1661.
8. Kohn, M. H., E. C. York, D. A. Kamradt, G. Haught, R. M. Sauvajot, and R. K. Wayne. 1999. Estimating population size by genotyping faeces. Proceedings ofthe Royal Society ofLondon, Series B, Biological Sciences 266:657-663.
9. Long, R. A., P. MacKay, W. J. Zielinski, and J. C. Ray, editors. 2008. Noninvasive survey methods for carnivores. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
10. Long, R. A., and W. J. Zielinski. 2008. Designing effective noninvasive carnivore surveys. Pages 8-44 in R. A. Long, P. MacKay, W. J. Zielinski, and J. C. Ray, editors. Noninvasive survey methods for carnivores. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
11. Lukacs, P. M., and K. P. Burnham. Review of capture-recapture methods applicable to noninvasive genetic sampling. Molecular Ecology 14 (3909-3919).
12. McKelvey, K. S., and M. K. Schwartz. 2004. Genetic errors associated with population estimation using non-invasive molecular tagging: problems and new solutions. Journal of Wildlife Management 68:439-448.
13. Miller, C. R., P. Joyce, and L. P. Waits. 2002. Assessing allelic dropout and genotype reliability using maximum likelihood. Genetics 160:357-366.
14. Mills, L. S., J. J. Citta, K. P. Lair, M. K. Schwartz, and D. A. Tallmon. 2000. Estimating animal abundance using noninvasive DNA sampling: promise and pitfalls. Ecological Applications 10:283-294.
15. Moehrenschlager, A., B. L. Cypher, K. Ralls, R. List, and M. A. Sovada. 2004. Comparative ecology and conservation priorities of swift and kit foxes. Pages 185-198 in D. W. Macdonald and C. Sillero-Zubiri, editors. Biology and conservation of wild canids. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2009. National Weather Service internet services team. Monthly precipitation for Bakersfield, California. Accessed 7 Mar 2009.
16. Nelson, J. L., B. L. Cypher, C. D. Bjurlin, and S. Creel. 2007. Effects of habitat on competition between kit foxes and coyotes. Journal of Wildlife Management 71:1467-1475.
17. Oftedal, O. T. 2000. Use of maternal reserves as a lactation strategy in large mammals. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 59:99-106.
18. Oftedal, O. T. and J. L. Gittleman. 1989. Patterns of energy output during reproduction in carnivores. Pages 355-378 in J. L. Gittleman, editor. Carnivore behavior, ecology, and evolution. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA.
19. Ortega, J., M. R. Franco, B. A. Adams, K. Ralls, and J. E. Maldonado. 2004. A reliable, noninvasive method for sex determination in the endangered San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica) and other canids. Conservation Genetics 5:715-718.
20. Otis, D. L., K. P. Burnham, G. C. White, and D. R. Anderson. 1978. Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monographs 62.
21. Prugh, L. R., C. E. Ritland, S. M. Arthur, and C. J. Krebs. 2005. Monitoring coyote population dynamics by genotyping faeces. Molecular Ecology 14:1585-1596.
22. Ralls, K., B. Cypher, and L. K. Spiegel. 2007. Social monogamy in kit foxes: formation, association, duration, and dissolution of mated pairs. Journal of Mammalogy 88:1439-1446.
23. Ralls, K., and D. A. Smith. 2004. Latrine use by San Joaquin kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis mutica) and coyotes (Canis latrans). Western North American Naturalist 64:544-547.
24. Ruell, E. W., S. P. D. Riley, M. R. Douglas, J. P. Pollinger, and K. R. Crooks. 2009. Estimating bobcat population sizes and densities in a fragmented urban landscape using noninvasive capture-recapture sampling. Journal of Mammalogy 90:129-135.
25. Schwartz, M. K., and S. L. Monfort. 2008. Genetic and endocrine tools for carnivore surveys. Pages 238-262 in R. A. Long, P. MacKay, W. J. Zielinski, and J. C. Ray, editors. Noninvasive survey methods for carnivores. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
26. Seidensticker, J. C. IV, M. G. Hornocker, W. V. Wiles, and J. P. Messick. 1973. Mountain lion social organization in the Idaho Primitive Area. Wildlife Monographs 35.
27. Smith, D. A., K. Ralls, B. L. Cypher, H. O. Clark, Jr., P. A. Kelly, D. F. Williams, and J. E. Maldonado. 2006a. Relative abundance of endangered San Joaquin kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis mutica) based on scat-detection dog surveys. Southwestern Naturalist 51:210-219.
28. Smith, D. A., K. Ralls, A. Hurt, B. Adams, M. Parker, B. Davenport, M. C. Smith, and J. E. Maldonado. 2003. Detection and accuracy rates of dogs trained to find scats of San Joaquin kit foxes. Animal Conservation 6:339-346.
29. Smith, D. A., K. Ralls, A. Hurt, B. Adams, M. Parker, and J. E. Maldonado. 2006b. Assessing reliability of microsatellite genotypes from kit fox faecal samples using genetic and GIS analyses. Molecular Ecology 15:387-406.
30. Spiegel, L. K. 1996. Studies of the San Joaquin kit foxes in undeveloped and oil-developed areas. California Energy Commission, Sacramento, USA.
31. Taberlet, P., S. Griffin, B. Goossens, S. Questiau, V. Manceau, N. Escaravage, L. P. Waits, and J. Bouvet. 1996. Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR. Nucleic Acids Research 24:3189-3194.
32. Zoellick, B. W., T. P. O'Farrell, P. M. McCue, C. E. Harris, and T. T. Kato. 1987. Reproduction of the San Joaquin kit fox on Naval Petroleum Reserve #1, Elk Hills, California, 1980-1985. U.S. Department of Energy Topical Report No. EGG 102822144. EG&G Energy Measurements, Goleta, CA.