Post-occupancy evaluation and sustainability: A review

Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Urban Design and Planning

Volumn 162, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 123-130

  Stevenson, Fionn ^a  

^a OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Buildings; Field testing and monitoring; Structures and design; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

BUILDINGS; CLIMATE CHANGE; PUBLIC POLICY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

BUILDING PERFORMANCE; BUILDING TYPOLOGIES; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH; FIELD TESTING AND MONITORING; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; POST OCCUPANCY EVALUATION; RESOURCE USE; SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; BUILDING; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; LITERATURE REVIEW; MONITORING; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; TESTING METHOD; TYPOLOGY;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 77956208499     PISSN: 17550793     EISSN: 17550807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1680/udap.2009.162.3.123     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Securing the Future: Delivering UK Sustainable Development Strategy. The Stationery Office, London, 2005.
2. Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform. Strategy for Sustainable Construction. BERR, London, 2008.
3. Boardman, B., Darby S., Killip G., Hinnells, M., Jardine, C., Palmer, J., and Sinden, G., 40% House. Environmental Change Institute, Oxford, 2005, ECI research report 31.
4. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. A Framework for Pro-environmental Behaviours. Defra, London, 2008.
5. Energy Efficiency Partnership for Homes. Compliance with Part L1 of the Building Regulations (An Investigation into the Reasons for Poor Compliance). EEPfH, London, 2006, FES client report ED 02302.
6. Bordass B. and Leaman A. Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation routine 1: a portfolio of feedback techniques. Building Research and Information, 2005, 33, No. 4, 347-352.
7. Friedman A., Zimring C. and Zube E. Environmental Design Evaluation. Plenum Press, New York, 1978, p. 20.
8. Prieser W. and Vischer J. (eds). Assessing Building Performance. Elsevier, Oxford, 2005, p. 8.
9. Bordass B. and Leaman A. Phase 5: occupancy-post-occupancy evaluation. In Assessing Building Performance (Prieser W. and Vischer J. (eds)). Elsevier, Oxford, 2005, pp. 72-79.
10. Markus T., Building Performance Research Unit. Building Performance. Applied Science Publishers, London, 1972.
11. Chartered Institution of Building Service Engineers. Energy Assessment and Reporting Methodology: Office Assessment Method. CIBSE, London, 1999, Technical memorandum TM22.
12. Bordass B. and Leaman A. Probe: how it happened, what it found and did it get us anywhere? Proceedings of the Windsor Conference: Closing the Loop: Post Occupancy Evaluation-The Next Steps, Windsor, 2004. See http//www.usablebuildings.co.uk for further details. Accessed 01/07/2008.
13. Preiser W. F. E., Rabinowitz H. Z. and White E. T. Post-occupancy Evaluation. Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York, 1988, p. 53.
14. Baird G., Grey J., Isaacs N., Kernohan D. and McIndoe G. Building Evaluation Techniques. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996
15. Way M. and Bordass B. Making feedback and post occupancy evaluation routine 2: soft landings-involving design and building teams in improving performance. Building Research and Information, 2005, 33, No. 4, 353-360.
16. Watson C. and Thompson K. Bringing Post-occupancy Evaluation to Schools in Scotland. OECD/PEB evaluating quality in educational facilities, 2005.
17. Stevenson F. and Rijal H. The sigma home: towards an authentic evaluation of a prototype building. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, University college Dustin, 2008.
18. Dou P. and Steemers K. User preferences for routing and seating in response to daylighting design in an art museum. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Singapore, 2007, pp. 764-771.
19. Kato A., Le Roux P. C. and Tsunekawa K. Building performance in Japan. In Assessing Building Performance (Prieser W. and Vischer J. (eds)). Elsevier, Oxford, 2005, pp. 149-159.
20. Stevenson F. and Williams N. Longitudinal evaluation of affordable housing in Scotland: lessons for low energy features. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Singapore, 2007, pp. 728-734.
21. Mallory-Hill S., van der Voordt T. J. M. and vanDortmont A. Evaluation of innovative workplace design in the Netherlands. In Assessing Building Performance (Prieser W. and Vischer J. (eds)). Elsevier, Oxford, 2005, pp. 160-169.
22. Ornstein S. W., de Andrade C. M. and Leite B. C. C. Assessing Brazilian workplace performance. In Assessing Building Performance (Prieser W. and Vischer J. (eds)). Elsevier, Oxford, 2005, pp. 128-138.
23. British Council for Offices. BCO Guide to Post-Occupancy Evaluation. BCO, London, 2008.
24. Leaman A. and Bordass B. Are users more tolerant of 'green' buildings? Building Research and Information, 2007, 35, No. 6, 662-673.
25. Wagenaar C. (ed.) The Architecture of Hospitals. NAi Publishers, Rotterdam, 2006.
26. Carthey J. Post occupancy evaluation: development of a standardised methodology for Australian health projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 2006, 6, No. 1, 63-80.
27. Department of Health/National Health Service. AEDET
28. Evolution: Design Evaluation Toolkit. NHS Estates, London. See http://www.design.dh.gov.uk/content/connections/aedet_evolution.asp for further details. Accessed 01/07/2008.
29. Burt-O'Dea K. A European Comparative Study of Design in Relation to Context: What is the Relationship between Design and Context, and how does this Impact on Performance in Healthcare Environments? The European Health Property Network, Durham University, 2005, Design impact study, pp. 1-122.
30. Stevenson F. and Humphris M. A Post-Occupancy Evaluation of the Dundee Maggie Centre. SUST at The Lighthouse, Glasgow, 2007, pp. 1-55. See http//www.sust.org/pdf/report_maggiecentre.pdf for more details (accessed 01/07/2008).
31. Lackney J. A. The state of post-occupancy evaluation in the practice of educational design. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of Environmental Design and Research Association, Edinburgh, 2001, See http://www.schoolstudio.engr.wisc.edu/poe.html (accessed 31/03/2009).
32. Department for Education and Skills. Schools for the Future: Design of Sustainable Schools, Case Studies. The Stationery Office, Norwich, 2006.
33. Sanoff H., Pasalar C. and Hashas M. School Building Assessment Methods. National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities, Washington DC, 2001. See http//www.edfacilities.org/pubs/sanoffassess.pdf for more details (accessed 01/07/2008).
34. Higher Education Funding Council for England. Guide to Post-Occupancy Evaluation. HEFCE, London, 2006.
35. Pegg I. M., Cripps A. and Kolokotroni M. Post-occupancy performance of five low-energy schools in the UK. ASHRAE Transactions, 2007, 113, No. 2, 3-13.
36. Ecological Design Group. Evaluation of Kincardine O Neil Innovative Rural Housing Design Project Canmore Place. Communities Scotland, Edinburgh, 2005, pp. 1-87.
37. European Community. Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings. Official Journal of the European Communties, 2003, L1, 65-71.
38. Department of Communities and Local Government. The Code for Sustainable Homes: Setting the Standard in Sustain-ability for New Homes. CLG publications, Wetherby, 2008, pp. 1-70. See http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/codesusta inabilitystandards for more details. Accessed 03/07/2008.
39. Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment and Department for Culture Media and Sport. Better Public Building. CABE, London, 2006, pp. 1-28.
40. Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment. Building for Life. Delivering Great Places to Live: 20 Questions you need to Answer. CABE, London, 2007, pp. 1-24.
41. Office of Government Commerce. Better Measurement, Better Management: Effective Management of the Government Estate. OGC, London, 2006, pp. 1-10.
42. Energy Saving Trust. Consultation draft: Monitoring Energy and Carbon Performance in New Homes. EST, London, 2007, pp. 1-16.
43. Office of Government Commerce. Property Benchmarking Project OGC/51, Final Report for Pilot Phase. OGC, London, 2005, pp. 1-41.
44. Roaf S. Benchmarking the 'sustainability' of a building project. In Assessing Building Performance (Prieser W. and Vischer J. (eds)). Elsevier, Oxford, 2005, pp. 93-103.
45. Leaman A. and Bordass W. Productivity in buildings: the killer variables. In Creating the Productive Workplace (Clemence-Croome D. (ed.)). A & FN Spon, London, 2005.
46. Lawson B., Phiri M. and Wells-Thorpe J. The Architectural Healthcare Environment and its Effects on Patient Health Outcomes. National Health Service Estates, The Stationery Office, Norwich, 2003.
47. Roaf S. and Nicol F. Post-occupancy and field studies of thermal comfort. Building Research and Information, 2005, 33, No. 4, 338-346.
48. Department of Communities and Local Government. Stamford Brook: Evaluating the Impact of an Enhanced Energy Performance Standard on Load-bearing Masonry Domestic Construction Deliverable 5a: Technical Note-Initial Results of Household Monitoring and Occupant Interviews. Partners in Innovation, London. 2006, CI 39/3/663-BD2324.
49. Royal Institute of British Architects. Carbon benchmarking of buildings. RIBA Membership Bulletin, January 2008. See http://www.bre.co.uk/carbonbuzz/about.jsp (accessed 31/03/2009).
50. Scottish Building Standards Agency. A Low Carbon Building Standards Strategy for Scotland. SBSA, Edinburgh, 2007, Report of panel appointed by Scottish Ministers chaired by Lynne Sullivan, pp. 1-44.
51. Energy Saving Trust. Grants for Monitoring Low and Zero Carbon Housing. EST, London. See http://www.energysavingtrust.org.uk/business/Global-Data/Publications/Mo nitoring-energy-and-carbon-performance-in-new-homes. (accessed 31/03/2009)
52. Vischer J. Towards a user-centred theory of the built environment. Building Research and Information, 2008, 36, No. 3, 231-240.
53. Zimring C., Dogan F., Dunne D., Fuller C. and Kampschroer K. The facility performance evaluation working group. In Assessing Building Performance (Preisner W. and Vischer J. (eds)). Elsevier, Oxford, 2005, pp. 180-187.
54. See http://www.ogc.gov.uk/better_asset_management_property_performance_measu rement.asp (accessed 19/11/2008).
55. Jones W. Fielden, Clegg, Bradley Studios' Heelis HQ for the National Trust, 2008. See http://www.bdonline.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode5426&storycode5310623 1&c51 for further details (accessed 19/11/2008).
56. Phillips R. Plan of Work: Multi-disciplinary Services. RIBA Publishing, London, 2008.
57. See http://www.brookes.ac.uk/studying/courses/postgraduate/2009/eesb (accessed 19/11/2008).