Bayesian approach to magnetotelluric tensor decomposition

Annals of Geophysics

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 21-32

  Červ, Václav ^a   Pek, Josef ^a   Menvielle, Michel ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS   (Czech Republic)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; MAGNETOTELLURIC METHOD; MARKOV CHAIN; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PROBABILITY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 77956206122     PISSN: 15935213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4401/ag-4681     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bahr, K. (1988). Interpretation of the magnetotelluric impedance tensor: regional induction and local telluric distortion, J. Geophys., 62, 119-127.
2. Bahr, K. (1991). Geologic noise in magnetotelluric data: a classification of distortion type, Phys. Earth. Planet. Int., 66, 24-38.
3. Bailey, R. C. and R. W. Groom (1987). Decomposition of the magnetotelluric impedance tensor which is useful in the presence of channeling, 57th Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 154-156.
4. Chave, A. D. and A. G. Jones (1997). Electric and magnetic field distortion decomposition of BC87 data, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 49, 767-789.
5. Chave, A. D. and J. T. Smith (1994). On electric and magnetic galvanic distortion tensor decompositions, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 4669-4682.
6. Gelman, A., J. B. Carlin, H. S. Stern and D. B. Rubin (2004). Bayesian data analysis. 2nd ed., Boca Raton.
7. Geman, S. and D. Geman (1984). Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 6, 721-741.
8. Gilks, W. R., S. Richardson and D.J. Spiegelhalter (1999). Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice: Interdisciplinary Statistics, London.
9. Grandis, H., M. Menvielle and M. Roussignol (1999). Bayesian inversion with Markov chains I. The magnetotelluric one-dimensional case, Geophys.J. Int., 138, 757-768.
10. Groom, R. W. and R. C. Bailey (1989). Decomposition of magnetotelluric impedance tensors in the presence of local three-dimensional galvanic distortion, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 1913-1925.
11. Groom, R. W. and R. C. Bailey (1991). Analytical investigations of the effects of near surface three-dimensional galvanic scatterers on MT tensor decomposition, Geophysics, 56, 496-518.
12. Groom, R. W, R. D. Kurtz, A. G.Jones and D. E. Boerner (1993). A quantitative methodology for determining the dimen sionality of conductivity structure and the extraction of regional impedance responses from magnetotelluric data, Geophys.J. Int., 115, 1095-1118.
13. Haario, H., E. Saksman and J. Tamminen (2003). Componentwise adaptation for MCMC. Reports of the Department of Mathematics, University of Helsinki, Preprint 342, pp. 1-20.
14. Jones, A. G. and R. W Groom (1993). Strike angle determination from the magnetotelluric tensor in the presence of noise and local distortion: rotate at your peril!, Geophys.J. Int., 113, 524-534.
15. Jones, A. G. and A. Schultz (1997). Introduction to the MT-DIW2 special issue, J. Geomag. Geoelect., 49, 727-738.
16. Lilley, F. E. M. (1998a). Magnetotelluric tensor decomposition: Part I, Theory for a basic procedure, Geophysics, 63, 1885-1897.
17. Lilley, F. E. M. (1998b). Magnetotelluric tensor decomposition: Part II, Examples of a basic procedure, Geophysics, 63, 1898-1907.
18. MacKay, D.J. C. (2003). Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms, Cambridge, UK, New York.
19. McNeice, G. W and A. G.Jones (2001). Multisite, multifrequency tensor decomposition of magnetotelluric data, Geophysics, 66, 158-173.
20. Menke, W (1989). Geophysical data analysis: Discrete inverse theory, International Geophysics Series, vol. 45, Academic Press, San Diego, California.
21. Sambridge, M. (1999). Geophysical inversion with a neighborhood algorithm: I. Searching a parameter space, Geophys. J. Int., 138, 479-494.
22. Smith, J. T. (1995). Understanding telluric distortion matrices, Geophys.J. Int., 122, 219-226.
23. Zhang, R, R. G. Roberts and L. B. Pedersen (1987). Magnetotelluric strike rules, Geophysics, 52, 267-278.