Territorial cohesion policy in the light of peripherality

Town Planning Review

Volumn 81, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 445-466

  Luukkonen, Juho ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COHESION; ECONOMIC GROWTH; REGIONAL POLICY; SPATIAL PLANNING; TERRITORIAL PLANNING; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN POLICY;

EUROPE;

EID: 77956204638     PISSN: 00410020     EISSN: 1478341X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3828/tpr.2010.12     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Armstrong, H. and Taylor, J. (2000), Regional Economics and Policy, 3rd edn, Oxford, Blackwell.
2. Arter, D. (2001), 'Regionalization in the European peripheries: the cases of Northern Norway and Finnish Lapland', Regional and Federal Studies, 11, 94-114.
3. Brown, F. and Hall, D., eds. (2000), Tourism in Peripheral Areas: Case Studies, New York, N Y, Channel View Publications.
4. CEC (2004a), A New Partnership for Cohesion: Convergence, Competitiveness, Cooperation. Third Report on Economic and Social Cohesion, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
5. CEC (2004b), Interim Territorial Cohesion Report, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
6. CEC (2005), Working Together for Growth and Jobs. A New Start for the Lisbon Strategy (Communication to the Spring European Council), Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
7. CEC (2008a), Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion. Turning Territorial Diversity into Strength. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Committee of the Regions and the European Economic and Social Committee. Brussels, 6.10.2008. COM (2008) 616 fnal.
8. CEC (2008b), Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion. Turning territorial diversity into strength (commission staff working document accompanying the Green Paper), Brussels, SEC.
9. CONFERENCE OF THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES (2007), Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community (CIG 14/07), Brussels, available online at: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/ cmsUpload/cg00014.en07.pdf
10. Conti, S. and Giaccaria, P. (2001), Local Development and Competitiveness, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. Copus, A. (2001), 'From core-periphery to polycentric development: concepts of spatial and aspatial peripherality', European Planning Studies, 9, 539-52.
12. Davoudi, S. (2007), 'The European social model and spatial policy research', in A. Faludi (ed.), Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society, Cambridge, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 81-103.
13. Domanski, B. (2004), 'West and East in "New Europe": the pitfalls of paternalism and a claimant attitude', European Urban and Regional Studies, 11, 377-81.
14. Doucet, P. (2006), 'Territorial cohesion of tomorrow: a path to cooperation or competition?', European Planning Studies, 14, 1473-85.
15. Dubois, A. (2008), 'Spatial planning in the northern periphery: planning for the Lisbon and Gothenburg strategies' (unpublished report for the Interreg IIIB Spatial North project), Stockholm, Nordregio.
16. DUTCH PRESIDENCY (2004), Exploiting Europe's territorial diversity for sustainable economic growth (Discussion paper, EU Informal Ministerial Meeting on Territorial Cohesion). Rotterdam, 29 November.
17. Eskelinen, H. and Snickars, F., eds. (1995), Competitive European Peripheries, Berlin, Springer-Verlag.
18. EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (1997), Treaty of Amsterdam amending the treaty on European Union, the treaties establishing the European Communities and certain related acts, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
19. Faludi, A. (2004), 'Territorial cohesion: old (French) wine in new bottles?', Urban Studies, 41, 1349-65.
20. Faludi, A. (2005), 'Territorial cohesion: an unidentifed political objective. Introduction to the special issue', Town Planning Review, 76, 1-13.
21. Faludi, A. (2006a), 'From European spatial development to territorial cohesion policy', Regional Studies, 40, 667-78.
22. Faludi, A. (2006b), 'The king is dead - long live the king. Why there is no renewed European spatial development perspective and what happens to the ESDP agenda anyhow' (paper for the Regional Studies Association International Conference 'Shaping EU Regional Policy: Economic, Social and Political Pressures'. Leuven, Belgium, 8-9 June 2006).
23. Faludi, A. (2007a), 'The territorial dimension of European integration', Stadt- und regionalforsc-hung, 2007, 9-24.
24. Faludi, A. (2007b), 'The European model of society', in A. Faludi (ed.), Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society, Cambridge, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
25. Geddes, M. and Newman, I. (1999), 'Evolution and confict in local economic development', Local Economy, 13, 12-25.
26. Gløersen, E., Dubois, A., Copus, A. and Schürmann, C. (2005), Northern Peripheral, Sparsely Populated Regions in the European Union, Stockholm, Nordregio.
27. Gren, J. (2003), 'Reaching the peripheral regional growth centres: centre-periphery convergence through the structural funds' transport infrastructure actions and the evolution of the centre-periphery paradigm', European Journal of Spatial Development, 3, 1-22.
28. Hadjimichalis, C. and Hudson, R. (2007), 'Rethinking local and regional development: implications for radical political practice in Europe', European Urban and Regional Studies, 14, 99-113.
29. Haughton, G. and Counsell, D. (2004), Regions, Spatial Strategies and Sustainable Development, London, Routledge.
30. Hübner, D. (2007), 'Speech on territorial cohesion' (speech given at Informal Ministerial Meeting on Territorial Cohesion and Regional Policy. Punta Delgada, Azores, Portugal, 23 November 2007).
31. Hübner, D. (2009), 'Territorial cohesion', available online at: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_ policy/consultation/terco/ (accessed 1 November 2009).
32. Illeris, S. (1995), 'Peripherality and European integration: the challenge facing the Nordic countries', in Eskelinen and Snickars (eds), Competitive European Peripheries, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 115-130.
33. Jauhiainen, J. S., Harvio, S., Luukkonen, J. and Moilanen, H. (2007), 'Regional development zones in Finland: territorial cohesion and competitiveness', Fennia, 185, 31-47.
34. Keeble, D., Offord, J. and Walker, S. (1988), Peripheral Regions in a Community of Twelve Member States, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Community.
35. Krugman, P. (1991), 'Increasing returns and economic geography', The Journal of Political Economy, 99, 483-99.
36. Leimgruber, W. (2004), Between Global and Local. Marginality and Marginal Regions in the Context of Globalization and Deregulation, Aldershot, Ashgate.
37. MINISTRY OF EMPLOYMENT AND THE ECONOMY (2008), 'Maakunnan kehittämisrahan jakautu-minen maakunnittain 2008', available online at: http://www.tem.f/fles/18527/yhteen-veto_maakunnan_kehittamisraha_2008.pdf (accessed 1 June 2008).
38. MINISTRY OF INTERIOR (2007), Valtioneuvoston päätös valtakunnallisista alueiden kehittämisen tavoitteista. Sisäasiainministeriö, Alueiden ja hallinnon kehittämisosasto (draft resolution 17 December 2007).
39. Moisio, S. (2005), 'Aluepolitiikan muuttuva nomos ja kilpailukykyisen Suomen luominen', in Moisio, S. (ed.), Maantiede mun silmäni avaa, maapalloa katselemaan, Turun yliopiston maantieteen laitoksen julkaisuja A, 171, 23-43.
40. Montagné Villette, S. and Hardill, I. (2007), 'Spatial peripheries, social peripheries: refections on the 'suburbs' of Paris', International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27, 52-64.
41. Morgan, K. (2004), 'Sustainable regions: governance, innovation and scale', European Planning Studies, 12, 871-89.
42. Myrdal, G. (1957), Economic Theory and Under-developed Regions, London, Gerald Duckworth and Co.
43. Neubauer, J., Dubois, A., Hanell, T., Lähteenmäki-Smith, K., Pettersson, K., Roto, J. and Moxnes Steineke, J. (2007), 'Regional development in the Nordic countries 2007', Nordregio Report, 2007, 1.
44. Oksa, J. (1995), 'Are leaping frogs freezing? Rural peripheries in competition', in Eskelinen and Snickars (eds), Competitive European Peripheries, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 183-203.
45. Paasi, A. (1995), 'The social construction of peripherality: the case of Finland and the Finnish- Russian border area', in Eskelinen and Snickars (eds), Competitive European Peripheries, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 235-258.
46. Peet, R. (1998), Modern Geographical T hought, Oxford, Blackwell Publishers.
47. Peyrony, J. (2007), 'Territorial cohesion and the European model of society: French perspectives', in A. Faludi (ed.), Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society, Cambridge, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 61-79.
48. Pike, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A. and Tomaney, J. (2008), Local and Regional Development, New York, N Y, Routledge (reprinted).
49. Richardson, T. (2000), 'Discourses of rurality in EU spatial policy: the European spatial development perspective', Sociologia Ruralis, 40, 53-71.
50. Schön, P. (2005), 'Territorial cohesion in Europe?', Planning Theory and Practice, 6, 389-400.
51. Scott, A. J. and Storper, M. (2003), 'Regions, globalization, development', Regional Studies, 37, 579-93.
52. Spiekermann, K and Wegener, M. (1996), 'Trans-European networks and unequal accessibility in Europe', EUREG-European Journal of Regional Development, 4, 35-42.
53. TERRITORIAL AGENDA OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (2007), 'Final draft', (agreed on the occasion of the informal ministerial meeting on urban development and territorial cohesion in Leipzig on 24-25 May 2007).
54. Tewdwr-Jones, M. and Morais Mourato, J. (2005), 'Territorial cohesion, economic growth and the desire for European "balanced competitiveness"', Town Planning Review, 76, 69-80.
55. Tuomi, J. and Sarajärvi, A. (2002), Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi, Helsinki, Kustannuso-sakeyhtiö Tammi.
56. Turok, I. (2004), 'Cities, regions and competitiveness', Regional Studies, 38, 1069-83.
57. Waterhout, B. (2007), 'Territorial cohesion: the underlying discourses', in A. Faludi (ed.), Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society, Cambridge, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 37-59.
58. Weber, R. P. (1990), 'Basic content analysis', Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 49, 2nd ed.), California, Sage Publications Inc.