A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, 4% prilocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, and 4% prilocaine for maxillary infiltrations.

Anesthesia progress

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 45-51

  Katz, Steven ^a   Drum, Melissa ^a   Reader, A ^a   Nusstein, John ^a   Beck, Mike ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADRENALIN; LIDOCAINE; LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT; PRILOCAINE; VASOCONSTRICTOR AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DENTAL ANESTHESIA; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCISOR; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; MALE; MAXILLARY NERVE; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TIME; TOOTH PULP DISEASE;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA, DENTAL; ANESTHESIA, LOCAL; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DENTAL PULP TEST; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; EPINEPHRINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCISOR; LIDOCAINE; MALE; MAXILLARY NERVE; MOLAR; PRILOCAINE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; VASOCONSTRICTOR AGENTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77956202132     PISSN: 00033006     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2344/0003-3006-57.2.45     Document Type: Article

References (0)