Phylogeny of Solanum series Piurana and related species in Solanum section Petota based on five conserved ortholog sequences

Taxon

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1091-1101

  Ames, Mercedes ^a   Spooner, David M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

COSII markers; Phylogeny; Solanaceae; Solanum; Wild potatoes

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKER; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; NOMENCLATURE; PHYLOGENY; POTATO; TAXONOMY; TOPOLOGY; WILD POPULATION;

COLOMBIA; ECUADOR; PERU;

MAGNOLIOPHYTA; SOLANACEAE; SOLANUM; SOLANUM JAMESII; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM; TUBEROSA;

EID: 77956197785     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tax.594009     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Ames, M. 2008. Evolutionary relationships of Solanum series Piurana and related species in Solanum section Petota (wild potatoes). Dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
2. Ames, M., Salas, A. & Spooner, D.M. 2007. The discovery and phylogenetic implications of a novel 41 bp plastid DNA deletion in wild potatoes. Pl. Syst. Evol. 268: 159-175.
3. Ames, M., Salas, A. & Spooner, D.M. 2008. A morphometric study of species boundaries of the wild potato Solanum series Piurana (Solanaceae) and putatively related species from seven other series in Solanum sect. Petota. Syst. Bot. 33: 566-578.
4. Baum, D.A. 2007. Concordance trees, concordance factors, and the exploration of reticulate genealogy. Taxon 56: 417-426.
5. Bradshaw, J.E., Bryan, G.J. & Ramsey, G. 2006. Genetic resources (including wild and cultivated Solanum species) and progress in their utilization in potato breeding. Potato Res. 49: 49-65.
6. Castillo, R. & Spooner, D.M. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of wild potatoes, Solanum series Conicibaccata (sect. Petota). Syst. Bot. 22: 45-83.
7. Clausen, A.M. & Spooner, D.M. 1998. Molecular support for the hybrid origin of the wild potato species Solanum × rechei. Crop Sci. 38: 858-865.
8. Correll, D.S. 1962. The potato and its wild relatives. Contr. Texas Res. Found., Bot. Stud. 4: 1-606.
9. Farris, J.S., Källersjö, M., Kluge, A.G. & Bult, C. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
10. Fulton, T.M., van der Hoeven, R., Eannetta, N.T. & Tanksley, S.D. 2002. Identification, analysis, and utilization of conserved ortholog set markers for comparative genomics in higher plants. Pl. Cell 14: 1457-1467.
11. Gavrilenko, T. 2007. Potato cytogenetics. Pp. 203-216 in: Vreugdenhil, D. (ed.), Potato biology and biotechnology: Advances and perspectives. Oxford, U.K.: Elsevier.
12. Harlan, J.R. & De Wet, J.M.J. 1975. On Ö. Winge and a prayer: The origins of polyploidy. Bot. Rev. 41: 361-390.
13. Hawkes, J.G. 1990. The potato: Evolution, biodiversity and genetic resources. London: Belhaven Press.
14. Hijmans, R., Gavrilenko, T., Stephenson, S., Bamberg, J., Salas, A. & Spooner, D.M. 2007. Geographic and environmental range expansion through polyploidy in wild potatoes (Solanum section Petota). Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 16: 485-495.
15. Hillis, D.M. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. 1992. Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. J. Heredity 83: 189-195.
16. Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Ronquist, F. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
17. Hughes, C. & Eastwood, R. 2006. Island radiation on a continental scale: Exceptional rates of plant diversification after uplift of the Andes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103: 10334-10339.
18. Jacobs, M.M.J., van den Berg, R.G., Vleeshouwers, V., Visser, M., Mank, R., Sengers, M., Hoekstra, R. & Vosman, B. 2008. AFLP analysis reveals a lack of phylogenetic structure within Solanum section Petota. BMC Evol. Biol. 8: 145.
19. Jansky, S.H. 2009. Breeding, genetics, and cultivar development. Pp. 27-61 in: Singh, J. & Kaur, L. (eds.), Advances in potato chemistry and echnology. San Diego, California: Elsevier.
20. Linder, C.R. & Rieseberg, L.H. 2004. Reconstructing patterns of reticulate evolution in plants. Amer. J. Bot. 91: 1700-1708.
21. Maddison, D.R. & Maddison, W.P. 2001. MacClade 4.03: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 4.08. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
22. Matsubayashi, M. 1991. Phylogenetic relationships in the potato and its related species. Pp. 93-118 in: Tsuchiya, T. & Gupta, P.K. (eds.), Chromosome engineering in plants: Genetics, breeding, evolution. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
23. Ochoa, C.M. 1999. Las papas de Sudamerica: Peru (Parte I). Lima: International Potato Center.
24. Ortiz, R. 2001. The state of the use of potato genetic diversity. Pp. 181-200 in: Cooper, H.D., Spillane, C. & Hodgkin, T. (eds.), Broadening the genetic base of crop production. Wallingford, U.K.: CABI Publishing.
25. Otto, S.P. & Whitton, J. 2000. Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annual Rev. Genet. 34: 401-437.
26. Pigliucci, M. 2003. Species as family resemblance concepts: The (dis-) solution of the species problem? Bio Essays 25: 596-602.
27. Posada, D. & Crandall, K.A. 1998. Modeltest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
28. Rieseberg, L.H. & Burke, J.M. 2001. The biological reality of species: Gene flow, selection and collective evolution. Taxon 50: 47-67.
29. Rieseberg, L.H. & Willis, J.H. 2007. Plant speciation. Science 317: 910-914.
30. Rieseberg, L.H., Wood, T.E. & Baack, E.J. 2006. The nature of plant species. Nature 440: 524-527.
31. Rodríguez, F. & Spooner, D.M. 2009. Nitrate reductase phylogeny of potato (Solanum sect. Petota) genomes with emphasis on the origins of the polyploid species. Syst. Bot. 34: 207-219.
32. Rodríguez, F., Wu, F., Ané, C., Tanksley, S. & Spooner, D.M. 2009. Do potatoes and tomatoes have a single evolutionary history, and what proportion of the genome supports this history? BMC Evol. Biol. 9: 191.
33. Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Pires, J.C., Kovarik, A., Tate, J.A. & Mavrodiev, E. 2004. Recent and recurrent polyploidy in Tragopogon (Asteraceae): Cytogenetic, genomic and genetic comparisons. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 82: 485-501.
34. Spooner, D.M. 2009. DNA barcoding will frequently fail in complicated groups: An example in wild potatoes. Amer. J. Bot. 96: 1177-1189.
35. Spooner, D.M., Ames, M., Fajardo, D. & Rodríguez, F. 2009. Species boundaries and interrelationships of Solanum sect. Petota (wild and cultivated potatoes) are drastically altered as a result of PBI-funded research. Botany and Mycology 2009, Snowbird, Utah, July 25-29. Abstract availabe at http://2009.botanyconference.org/engine/search/index.php?func=detail&aid=24.
36. Spooner, D.M., Anderson, G.J. & Jansen R.K. 1993. Chloroplast DNA evidence for the interrelationships of tomatoes, potatoes, and pepinos (Solanaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 80: 676-688.
37. Spooner, D.M. & Castillo, R. 1997. Reexamination of series relationships of South American wild potatoes (Solanaceae: Solanum sect. Petota): Evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction site variation. Amer. J. Bot. 84: 671-685.
38. Spooner D.M., Rodríguez, F., Polgár, Z., Ballard, H.E, Jr. & Jansky, S. 2008. Genomic origins of potato polyploids: GBSSI gene sequencing data. Crop Sci. 48, Supplement 1 (The plant genome): S27-S36.
39. Spooner, D.M. & Sytsma, K.J. 1992. Reexamination of series relationships of Mexican and Central American wild potatoes (Solanum sect. Petota): Evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction site variation. Syst. Bot. 17: 432-448.
40. Spooner, D.M. & van den Berg, R.G. 1992. Species limits and hypothesis of hybridization of Solanum berthaultii Hawkes and S. tarijense Hawkes: Morphological data. Taxon 41: 685-700.
41. Stamatakis, A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum Likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688-2690.
42. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
43. Templeton, A.R. 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and apes. Evolution 37: 221-224.
44. Udall, J.A. & Wendel, J.F. 2006. Polyploidy and crop improvement. Crop Sci. 46, Supplement 1 (The plant genome): S3-S14.
45. Van Eck, H.J. 2007. Genetics of morphological and tuber traits. Pp. 91-115 in: Vreugdenhil, D. (ed.), Potato biology and biotechnology: advances and perspectives. Oxford, U.K.: Elsevier.
46. Watanabe, K.N. & Orrillo, M. 1994. Disomic behaviour of polyploidy tuber-bearing Solanum species. Jap. J. Genet. 69: 637-643.
47. Watanabe, K. & Peloquin, S.J. 1991. The occurrence and frequency of 2n pollen in 2x, 4x, and 6x wild, tuber-bearing Solanum species from Mexico, and Central and South America. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82: 621-626.
48. Wendel, F.J. 2000. Genome evolution in polyploids. Pl. Molec. Biol. 42: 225-249.
49. Wu, F., Mueller, L.A., Crouzillat, D., Pétiard, V. & Tanksley, S.D. 2006. Combining bioinformatics and phylogenetics to identify large sets of single-copy orthologous genes (COSII) for comparative, evolutionary and systematic studies: A test case in the Euasterid plant clade. Genetics 174: 1407-1420.