Assessing fluid responsiveness with the passive leg raising maneuver in patients with increased intra-abdominal pressure: Be aware that not all blood returns

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 38, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1912-1915

  Malbrain, Manu L N G ^a   Reuter, Daniel A ^b  

^a ZiekenhuisNetwerk Antwerpen   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

abdominal compartment; abdominal pressure; fluid responsiveness; functional hemodynamics; preload; pulse pressure variation; stroke volume variation

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL PRESSURE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CIRCULATION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; EDITORIAL; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; INTRAABDOMINAL HYPERTENSION; LEG BLOOD FLOW; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ABDOMEN; COMPARTMENT SYNDROME; FLUID THERAPY; LEG; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PRESSURE;

ABDOMEN; COMPARTMENT SYNDROMES; FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; LEG; PRESSURE;

EID: 77956196302     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: 15300293     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f1b6a2     Document Type: Editorial

References (21)

1. Mahjoub Y, Touzeau J, Airapetian N, et al: The passive leg-raising maneuver cannot accurately predict fluid responsiveness in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension. Crit Care Med. 2010; 38:1824-1829.
2. Malbrain ML, de Laet I: Functional hemodynamics and increased intra-abdominal pressure: Same thresholds for different conditions? Crit Care Med 2009; 37:781-783.
3. Michard F, Teboul JL: Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: A critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121: 2000-2008.
4. Reuter DA, Bayerlein J, Goepfert MS, et al: Influence of tidal volumes on left ventricular stroke volume variation. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29:476-480.
5. Perel A, Minkovich L, Preisman S, et al: Assessing fluid-responsiveness by a standardized ventilatory maneuver: The respiratory systolic variation test. Anesth Analg 2005; 100:942-945.
6. Monnet X, Osman D, Ridel C, et al: Predicting volume responsiveness by using the endexpiratory occlusion in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 2009; 37:951-956.
7. Malbrain ML, De Potter TJ, Dits H, et al: Global and right ventricular end-diastolic volumes correlate better with preload after correction for ejection fraction. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2010; 54:622-631.
8. Maas JJ, Geerts BF, van den Berg PC, et al: Assessment of venous return curve and mean systemic filling pressure in postoperative cardiac surgery patients. Crit Care Med 2009; 37:912-918.
9. Cannesson M, Delannoy B, Morand A, et al: Does the Pleth variability index indicate the respiratory-induced variation in the plethysmogram and arterial pressure waveforms? Anesth Analg 2008; 106:1189-1194.
10. Wilcox S, Vandam LD: Alas, poor Trendelenburg and his position! A critique of its uses and effectiveness. Anesth Analg 1988; 67:574-578.
11. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Schmidt C, et al: Trendelenburg positioning after cardiac surgery: Effects on intrathoracic blood volume and cardiac performance. Eur J Anaesth 2003; 20:17-20.
12. Murphy CV, Schramm GE, Doherty JA, et al: The importance of fluid management in acute lung injury secondary to septic shock. Chest 2009; 136:102-109.
13. Cheatham ML, Malbrain ML: Cardiovascular implications of abdominal compartment syndrome. Acta Clin Belg Suppl 2007; 62: 98-112.
14. Mahjoub Y, Pila C, Friggeri A, et al: Assessing fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: False-positive pulse pressure variation is detected by Doppler echocardiographic evalua-tion of the right ventricle. Crit Care Med 2009; 37:2570-2575.
15. Malbrain ML, Chiumello D, Pelosi P, et al: Incidence and prognosis of intraabdominal hypertension in a mixed population of critically ill patients: A multiple-center epidemiological study. Crit Care Med 2005; 33: 315-322.
16. Malbrain ML, Cheatham ML, Kirkpatrick A, et al: Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. I. Definitions. Intensive Care Med 2006; 32:1722-1732.
17. Roeck M, Jakob SM, Boehlen T, et al: Change in stroke volume in response to fluid challenge: Assessment using esophageal Doppler. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29:1729-1735.
18. Malbrain ML: Different techniques to measure intra-abdominal pressure (IAP): Time for a critical re-appraisal. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30:357-371.
19. Cheatham ML, De Waele JJ, De Laet I, et al: The impact of body position on intraabdominal pressure measurement: A multicenter analysis. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 2187-2190.
20. De Keulenaer BL, De Waele JJ, Powell B, et al: What is normal intra-abdominal pressure and how is it affected by positioning, body mass and positive end-expiratory pressure? Intensive Care Med 2009; 35:969-976.
21. Malbrain ML, De Laet I: Do we need to know body anthropomorphic data whilst measuring abdominal pressure? Intensive Care Med 2010; 36:180-182