Application of time reverse modeling on ultrasonic non-destructive testing of concrete

Applied Mathematical Modelling

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 807-816

  Saenger, Erik H ^a,b   Kocur, Georg Karl ^c   Jud, Roman ^c   Torrilhon, Manuel ^c  

^a GEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

^b Spectraseis AG   (Switzerland)

^c ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Finite differences; Imaging; Non destructive testing; Source localization; Time reverse modeling; Wave propagation

Indexed keywords

FINITE DIFFERENCE; IMAGING; NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING; REVERSE MODELING; SOURCE LOCALIZATION;

ACOUSTIC EMISSIONS; CONCRETE TESTING; NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION; REINFORCED CONCRETE; WAVE EQUATIONS; WAVE PROPAGATION;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 77956182171     PISSN: 0307904X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2010.07.035     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Fink M. Time-reversed acoustics. Sci. Am. 1999, 67-73.
2. Kao H., Shan S.-J. The source-scanning algorithm: mapping the distribution of seismic sources in time and space. Geophys. J. Int. 2004, 589-594.
3. Gajewski D., Tessmer E. Reverse modelling for seismic event characterization. Geophys. J. Int. 2005, 276-284.
4. Steiner B., Saenger E.H., Schmalholz S.M. Time reverse modeling of low-frequency microtremors: a potential method for hydrocarbon reservoir localization. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2008, 35:L03307.
5. Shiotani T., Aggelis D.G. Wave propagation in cementitious material containing artificial distributed damage. Mater. Struct. 2009, 42:377-384.
6. Grosse C.U. Advances in Construction Materials 2007, Springer, Heidelberg.
7. Fellinger P., Marklein R., Langenberg K.-J., Klaholz S. Numerical modeling of elastic wave propagation and scattering with EFIT - elastodynamic finite integration technique. Wave Motion 1995, 21:47-66.
8. Schubert F. Numerical time-domain modeling of linear and nonlinear ultrasonic wave propagation using finite integration techniques - theory and applications. Ultrasonics 2004, 42:221-229.
9. Schubert F., Köhler B. Ten lectures on impact-echo. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 2008, 27:5-21.
10. Schechinger B., Vogel T. Acoustic emission for monitoring a reinforced concrete beam subject to four-point-bending. Constr. Build. Mater. 2007, 21:483-490.
11. Grosse C.U., Ohtsu M. Acoustic Emission Testing: Basics for Research - Applications in Civil Engineering; With Contributions by Numerous Experts 2008, Springer, Heidelberg.
12. Fink M. Time reversal of ultrasonic fields - part 1: basic principles. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 1992, 39(5):555-566.
13. Aki K., Richards P.G. Quantitative Seismology. Theory and Methods 1980, W.H. Freeman and Company, San Fransisco.
14. Saenger E.H., Gold N., Shapiro S.A. Modeling the propagation of elastic waves using a modified finite-difference grid. Wave Motion 2000, 31(1):77-92.
15. Saenger E.H., Bohlen T. Anisotropic and viscoelastic finite-difference modeling using the rotated staggered grid. Geophysics 2004, 69(2):583-591.
16. Steiner B. Time reverse modeling of low-frequency tremor sources. Dissert. ETH Zurich 2009, 1826.
17. Häfner S., Eckhardt S., Luther T., Könke C. Mesoscale modeling of concrete: geometry and numerics. Comput. Struct. 2006, 84:450-461.
18. Fuller W.B., Thomson S.E. The laws of proportioning concrete. Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 1907, 59:67-143.
19. Yao Y., Liua D., Chea Y., Tanga D., Tanga S., Huanga W. Non-destructive characterization of coal samples from china using microfocus X-ray computed tomography. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2009, 80:113-123.
20. Saenger E.H., Shapiro S.A. Effective velocities in fractured media: a numerical study using the rotated staggered finite-difference grid. Geophys. Prospect. 2002, 50(2):183-194.
21. Saenger E.H. Numerical methods to determine effective elastic properties. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 2008, 598-605.