CIFOR. The sustainability of forest management: Assessing the impact of cifor criteria and indicators research

International Research on Natural Resource Management: Advances in Impact Assessment

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 217-245

  Spilsbury, Michael J ^a  

^a CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY RESEARCH   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956181450     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (33)

1. Bass, S., Thornber, K., Markopoulos, M., Roberts, S. and Grieg-Gran, M. (2001) Certification's Impacts on Forests, Stakeholders and Supply Chains. Instruments for Sustainable Private Sector Forestry Series. International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
2. Bero, L., Grilli, R., Grimshaw, J., Harvey, E., Oxman, A.D. and Thomson, M.A. (1998) Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. British Medical Journal 317, 465-468.
3. CIFOR (1999) Criteria and Indicators Toolbox Series 1-9. Centre for International Forestry Research, Bognor, Indonesia, available at http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/acm/ pub/toolbox.html (accessed 6 June, 2004).
4. De Azevedo, T.R., De Freitas, A.G. and Donovan, R.Z. (2001) Perspectives on Sustainable Forestry and Certification: Forest Certification a Catalyst of Forest Conservation?. Imaflora/Rainforest Alliance, New York.
5. De Camino, R. and Alfaro, M. (1998) Certification in Latin America: Experience to Date. Rural Development Forestry Network. Network Paper 23 C. Overseas Development Forestry Network, London; available at http://www.odifpeg.org.uk/rdfn/englishfiles/ networkpapers23english.html (accessed 9 November 2004).
6. Douthwaite, B. (2002) Enabling Innovation: A Practical Guide to Understanding and Fostering Technological Change. Zed Books, London.
7. FSC (2002a) FSC Guidelines for Certification Bodies. Forest Stewardship Council, Bonn, Germany.
8. Gullison, R.E. (2003) Does forest certification conserve biodiversity?. Oryx 37(2), 153-165.
9. Mayers, J., Evans, J. and Foy, T. (2001) Raising the Stakes: Impacts of Privatisation, Certification and Partnerships in South African Forestry. Instruments for Sustainable Private Sector Forestry Series. International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
10. Mengin-Lecreulx, P., Anvo, A., Huttel, C., van Haaften, H. and Anatole, N.K. (1995) Final Report: Test Côte d'Ivoire, 2-30 June. CIFOR Project on Testing Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Management of Forests; English translation by Guy Ferlin. Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
11. Nasi, R., Ondo, R., Gami, N., Dondyas, S. and Hecketsweiler, P. (1999) Initiative pour les Critères et Indicateurs de l'OAB. Rapport du Test du Gabon. Organisation Africaine du Bois, Libreville, Gabon.
12. Newsom, D. (2004) Assessing the Impacts of Forest Certification on Forest Ecosystems, Economies and Communities: An Analysis of Preconditions and Conditions given to SmartWood certified Operations in the US TREES Program. Rainforest Alliance, New York.
13. Prabhu, R., Maynard, W.M., Eba'a Atyi, R., Colfer, C.J.P., Shepherd, G., Venkateswarlu, P. and Tiayon, F. (1998) Testing Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management in Cameroon: the Kribi Test. Final Report. Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia; available at http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/publications/ pdf_files/books/spubs/sp-kribi.pdf (accessed 24 August 2004).
14. SCS (2004) List of Public Certification Summaries. Available at: http://www.forestry.sgs.com/forestry/forest_certclients.html (accessed 10-20 October, 2004).
15. SGS Qualifor (2004) List of Public Certification Summaries. SGS Qualifor, Oxford, UK, available at http://www.forestry.sgs.com/forestry_services_index_v2/mini_ site_forestry_certification/ forest_management_certification.htm (accessed 10-20 October, 2004).
16. Sheil, D., Nasi. R. and Johnson, B. (2004) Ecological criteria and indicators for tropical forest landscapes: challenges in the search for progress. Ecology and Society 9(1), 7. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art7/.
17. Sizer, N. (2001) Building a strategy for impact, or how you can change the world in ten simple steps. In: Proceedings of the Expert Consultation on Communication between Forestry Researchers and Policy Makers and Stakeholders, Chiang Mai, Thailand, May. FORSPA Publication No. 27/2001. FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok.
18. SmartWood (2000) SmartWood Generic Guidelines for Assessing Forest Management. SmartWood, Rainforest Alliance, New York.
19. SmartWood (2002-2003) http://www.rainforest-alliance.org/programs/forestry/ smartwood/certification/interim_stamdards.cfm (accessed 10 October, 2004).
20. Smartwood (2004) List of Public Certification Summaries. Rainforest Alliance, Richmond, Vermont, available at http://rainforest-alliance.org/programs/forestry/ smartwood/public-summary-reports.html (accessed 10-20 October, 2004).
21. Spilsbury, M.J. (2005) The Sustainability of Forest Management: Assessing the Impact of CIFOR Criteria and Indicators Research. CIFOR Impact Paper No. 4. Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor Indonesia.
22. Spilsbury, M.J. and Bose, P. (2005) Influencing the Global Forest Policy Agenda - An Evaluation of CIFOR's Research. CIFOR Impact Paper No 2. Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
23. Spilsbury, M J. and Nasi, R. (2006) The interface of policy research and the policy development process: challenges posed to the forestry community. Forest Policy and Economics 8(2), 193-205.
24. Stork, N.E., Boyle, T.J.B, Dale, V., Eeley, H., Finegan, B., Lawes, M., Manokaran, N., Prabhu, R. and Soberon, J. (1997) Criteria and Indicators for Assessing the Sustainability of Forest Management: Conservation of Biodiversity. CIFOR Working Paper No. 17. Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
25. Tabor, S.R. and Faber, D.C. (1998) Closing the Loop: From Research on Natural Resources to Policy Change. Policy Management Report No. 8. European Centre for Development Policy Management, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
26. Thornber, K. (1999) Overview of Global Trends in FSC Certificates. Instruments for Sustainable Private Sector Forestry. Forestry and Land Use Programme. International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
27. UNEP-WCMC, WWF, FSC & GTZ (2004) Information on Certified Forest Sites endorsed by Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). United Nations Environment Programme, World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK, available at http://www.fsc.org/en/whatsnew/fsc_certificates (accessed 10 October, 2004).
28. USDA (2002) Local Unit Criteria & Indicators Development Project. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC; available at http://www.fs.fed.us/institute/ lucid/final_report/ (accessed April 2007).
29. Zweede, J., Kressin, J., Mesquita, J.N.M., Silva, V.M. and Colfer, C. (1995) Testing criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management. Final report: Test Brazil, 22 October-21 November, 1995. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia. Unpublished.
30. http://www.cifor.org/acm/pub/toolbox.html
31. http://www.rainforest-alliance.org/programs/forestry/smartwood/public-summaryreports.html
32. http://www.qualifor.sgs.com/home_qualifor/forest_management_certification/forest_management_reports.htm
33. http://www.scscertified.com/forestry/forest_certclients.html