Energy, environmental and economic comparison of different powertrain/fuel options using well-to-wheels assessment, energy and external costs - European market analysis

Energy

Volumn 35, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 4156-4171

  Torchio, Marco F ^a   Santarelli, Massimo G ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Economic index; Energy index; Environmental index; European market; Well to wheels

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILES; BIOFUELS; COMMERCE; COMPETITION; COSTS; ELECTRIC LOAD FORECASTING; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; WHEELS;

AUTOMOTIVE SECTOR; BATTERY ELECTRIC VEHICLES; DECISION MAKERS; DRIVING RANGE; ECONOMIC COMPARISONS; ECONOMIC INDEXES; ENERGY COST; ENERGY INDEXES; ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS; ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS; ENVIRONMENTAL INDEX; EUROPEAN MARKET; EUROPEAN MARKETS; EXTERNAL COSTS; GHG EMISSION; GLOBAL INDEX; MARKET CONDITION; POLLUTANT EMISSION;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

ABANDONED MINE; BIOFUEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPETITIVENESS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; ELECTRICAL POWER; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; GREENHOUSE GAS; NATURAL GAS; TRAIN;

EUROPE;

EID: 77956179992     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.06.037     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. General Motors Corporation, Argonne National Laboratory, BP, ExxonMobil, Shell. Well-to-wheel energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of advanced fuel/vehicle systems - North American analysis. GM Argonne Nat Lab Rep 2001, 1-3. http://www.transportation.anl.gov.
2. Brinkman N., Wang M., Weber T., Darlington T. Well-to-wheels analysis of advanced fuel/vehicle systems - A North American Study of energy use, greenhouse gas emissions, and criteria pollutant emissions. GM Argonne Nat Lab Rep 2005, http://www.transportation.anl.gov.
3. L-B-Systemtechnik GmbH, General Motors Corporation, BP, ExxonMobil, Shell, TotalFinaElf. GM well-to-wheel analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of advanced fuel/vehicle systems - A European study. Report, Ottobrunn, Germany http://www.lbst.de.
4. Concawe, Eucar, JRC/IES. Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the European context. Three reports. Version 1b http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu.
5. Concawe, Eucar, JRC/IES. Well-To-Wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the European context: well-to-tank report http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/media/WTT_Report_010307.pdf.
6. Concawe, Eucar, JRC/IES. Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the European context: tank-to-wheels report http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/media/TTW_Report_010307.pdf.
7. Concawe, Eucar, JRC/IES. Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the European context: well-to-wheels report http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/media/WTW_Report_010307.pdf.
8. Wang M. Fuel choices for fuel-cell vehicles: well-to-wheels energy and emission impacts. J Power Sources 2002, 112(1):307-321.
9. Mizsey P., Newson E. Comparison of different vehicle power trains. J Power Sources 2001, 102(1-2):205-209.
10. Hekkert M.P., Hendriks F.H.J.F., Faaij A.P.C., Neelis M.L. Natural gas as an alternative to crude oil in automotive fuel chains well-to-wheel analysis and transition strategy development. Energy Policy 2005, 33(5):579-594.
11. Silva C.M., Gonçalves G.A., Farias T.L., Mendes-Lopes J.M.C. A tank-to-wheel analysis tool for energy and emissions studies in road vehicles. Sci Total Environ 2006, 367(1):441-447.
12. Zamel N., Li X. Life cycle analysis of vehicles powered by a fuel cell and by internal combustion engine for Canada. J Power Sources 2006, 155(2):297-310.
13. Zamel N., Li X. Life cycle comparison of fuel cell vehicles and internal combustion engine vehicles for Canada and the United States. J Power Sources 2006, 162(2):1241-1253.
14. Svensson A.M., Møller-Holst S., Glöckner R., Maurstad O. Well-to-wheel study of passenger vehicles in the Norwegian energy system. Energy 2007, 32(4):437-445.
15. Chang L., Li Z., Gao D., Huang H., Ni W. Pathways for hydrogen infrastructure development in China: Integrated assessment for vehicle fuels and a case study of Beijing. Energy 2007, 32(11):2023-2037.
16. IEA Word energy outlook, 2006 2006, International Energy Agency, OECD/IEA, Paris. http://www.iea.org/.
17. IEA From 1st to 2nd-generation biofuel technologies: an overview of current industry and RD&D activities 2008, OECD/IEA.
18. Agarwal A.K. Biofuels (alcohols and biodiesel) applications as fuels for internal combustion engines. Prog Energy Combust Sci 2007, 33(3):233-271.
19. Huo H., Wu Y., Wang M. Total versus urban: well-to-wheels assessment of criteria pollutant emissions from various vehicle/fuel systems. Atmos Environ 2009, 43(10):1796-1804.
20. Ou X., Zhang X., Chang S., Guo Q. Energy consumption and GHG emissions of six biofuel pathways by LCA in China. Appl Energy 2009, 86(1):S197-S208.
21. Thomas C.E. Fuel cell and battery electric vehicles compared. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34(15):6005-6020.
22. European Commission. External costs of transport in ExternE, Contract JOS3-CT95-0004 http://externe.jrc.es/.
23. European Commission European energy and transport. Trends to 2030-update 2007 2008, European Commission Directorate-General for Energy and Transport. http://bookshop.europa.eu/eubookshop/publicationDetails.action?pubuid%3D585667%26offset%3D6.
24. Lewis CA. Fuel and energy production emission factors. MEET Project (Methodologies for estimating air pollutant emissions from transport), Task No. 3.4, deliverable No. 20, contract No. ST-96-SC.204; 1997.
25. Lane B. Life cycle assessment of vehicle fuels and technologies: final report. London Borough of Camden, Ecolane Transport Consultancy http://www.ecolane.co.uk.
26. OECD Environmental data, compendium 2006/2007, air http://www.oecd.org.
27. Spath P.L., Mann M.K. Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production via natural gas steam reforming. NREL Technical Report NREL/TP-570-27637 http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy01osti/27637.pdf.
28. Campanari S., Manzolini G., Garcia de la Iglesia F. Energy analysis of electric vehicles using batteries or fuel cells through well-to-wheel driving cycle simulations. J Power Sources 2009, 186(2):464-477.
29. European Union, Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European parliament and of the council of 20 June 2007 on type approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information. Official Journal of the European Union, L 171/1, 29 June 2007.
30. European Union, Directive 2003/17/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 3 March 2003 amending Directive 98/70/EC relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels. Official Journal of the European Union, L 76/10, 22 March 2003.
31. Maibach M., Schreyer C., Sutter D., van Essen H.P., Boon B.H., Smokers R., et al. Handbook on estimation of external costs in the transport sector Internalisation measures and Policies for all external cost of transport (IMPACT). Version 1.1, Publication number: 07.4288.52 CE Delft http://ec.europa.eu/transport/sustainable/2008_external_costs_en.htm.
32. LAT European database of vehicle stock for the calculation and forecast of pollutant and greenhouse gases emissions: road transport data per country/year. LAT (Laboratory Appl Thermodynamics) 2008, http://lat.eng.auth.gr/copert/.
33. IEA Word energy outlook 2008 2008, International Energy Agency, OECD/IEA. http://www.iea.org/.
34. U.S.DOE Annual energy outlook 2009 with projections to 2030 2009, DOE/EIA-0383, Energy Information Administration U.S. Department of Energy. http://www.eia.doe.gov.