Building domain-specific taggers without annotated (domain) data

EMNLP-CoNLL 2007 - Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1103-1111

  Miller, John E ^a   Torii, Manabu ^b   Vijay Shanker, K ^a  

^a University of Delaware   (United States)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOMAIN SPECIFIC; EM TRAINING; FUNDAMENTAL COMPONENT; HMM MODELS; LEXICAL PROBABILITY; NLP SYSTEMS; PART OF SPEECH TAGGING; RELATED WORD;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 77956177786     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Banko, M. and Moore, R.C. 2004. Part of Speech Tagging in Context. In Proceedings, 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2004), Geneva, Switzerland, pp.556-561.
2. Baum, L. 1972. An inequality and associated maximization technique in statistical estimation for probabilistic functions of a Markov process. Inequalities 3:1-8.
3. Brants, T. 2000. TNT - a statistical part-of-speech tagger. In Proceedings of the Sixth Applied Natural Language Processing Conference ANLP-2000.
4. Brill, E. 1995. Transformation-based error-driven learning and natural language processing: A case study in part of speech tagging. Computational Linguistics, 21(4):543-565.
5. Cucerzan, S. and Yarowsky, D. 2000. Language independent minimally supervised induction of lexical probabilities. Proceedings of ACL-2000, Hong Kong, pages 270-277.
6. Cutting, D., Kupiec, J., Pedersen, J., and Sibun, P. 1992. A practical part of sppech tagger. Proceedings of 3rd Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, 53-58.
7. DeForest, J. 2000. Graduate Record Exam Suffixed web page. Michigan State University. http://www.msu.edu/~defores1/gre/sufx/gre-suffx.htm.
8. Elworthy, D. 1994. Does Baum-Welch re-estimation help taggers. In Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, ACL.
9. Kulick, S., Bies, A., Liberman, M., Mandel, M., McDonald, R., Palmer, M., Schein, A. and Ungar, L. Integrated Annotation for Biomedical Information Extraction. HLT/NAACL, 2004.
10. Kupiec, J. 1992. Robust Part-of-speech Tagging Using a Hidden Markov Model. Computer Speech and Language, 6.
11. Lease, M. and Charniak, E. 2005. Parsing Biomedical Literature. IJCNLP-2005: 58-69.
12. Marcus, M., Santorini, B., Marcinkiewicz, M.A. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19:313- 330.
13. PennBioIE. 2005. Mining The Bibliome Project. http://bioie.ldc.upenn.edu/ .
14. Schone, P. and Jurafsky, D. 2001, Language Independent Induction of Part of Speech Class Labels Using Language Universals. IJCAI Workshop on Text Learning: Beyond Supervision.
15. Smith, L., Rindflesch, T., Wilbur, W.J. 2004. MedPost: a part-of-speech tagger for biological text. Bioinformatics 20 (14):2320-2321. (Pubitemid 39341625)
16. Smith, L., Rindflesch, T., Wilbur, W.J. 2005. The importance of the lexicon in tagging biomedical text. Natural Language Engineering 12(2) 1-17.
17. Tateisi, Y., Ohta, T., dong Kim, J., Hong, H., Jian, S., Tsujii, J. 2003. The GENIA corpus: Medline abstracts annotated with linguistic information. In: Third meeting of SIG on Text Mining, Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology (ISMB).
18. Tsuruoka, Y., Tateishi, Y., Kim, J. D., Ohta, T., McNaught, J., Ananiadou, S., and Tsujii, J.. 2005. Developing a Robust Part-of-Speech Tagger for Biomedical Text, Advances in Informatics - 10th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics, LNCS 3746: 382-392.
19. Wang, Q. and Schuurmans, D. 2005. Improved estimation for unsupervised part-of-speech tagging. In IEEE NLP-KE www.AllWords.com. 2005. English Dictionary and Language Guide. AllSites LLC. www.AllSitesllc.com.