An application of the central limit theorem to coalescence times in the structured coalescent model with strong migration

Journal of Mathematical Biology

Volumn 61, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 695-714

  Notohara, Morihiro ^a  

^a NAGOYA CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Central limit theorem; Coalescence times; Conservative and nonconservative migration; Structured coalescent process

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENE; GENETICS; HAPLOIDY; MUTATION; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION GENETICS; POPULATION MIGRATION; PROBABILITY; TIME;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMAL MIGRATION; ANIMALS; GENES; GENETICS, POPULATION; HAPLOIDY; MARKOV CHAINS; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 77956172244     PISSN: 03036812     EISSN: 14321416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00285-009-0318-z     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bahlo M, Griffiths RC (2001) Coalescence time for two genes from a subdivided population. J Math Biol 43: 397-410.
2. Chen X (1999) Limit Theorems for functionals of Ergodic Markov chains with general state space. Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society No. 664.
3. Dembo A, Zeitouni O (1998) Large deviations techniques and applications, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, p 7.
4. Doob JL (1953) Stochastic processes. Wiley, New York.
5. Herbots HM (1997) The structured coalescent. In: Donnelly P, Tavare S (eds) Progress in population genetics and human evolution. Springer, New York, pp 231-255.
6. Kingman JFC (1982) The coalescent. Stoch Process Appl 13: 235-248.
7. Moral PD (2004) Fenman-Kac formulae. Springer, New York.
8. Möhle M (2001) Forward and backward diffusion approximations for haploid exchangeable population models. Stoch Process Appl 95: 133-149.
9. Nagylaki T (1980) The strong-migration limit in geographically structured populations. J Math Biol 9: 101-114.
10. Nagylaki T (2000) Geographical invariance and the strong-migration limit in subdivided populations. J Math Biol 41: 123-142.
11. Nordborg M (1997) Structured coalescent processes on different time scales. Genetics 146: 1501-1514.
12. Nordborg M (2001) Coalescent theory. In: Balding DJ, Bishop MJ, Cannings C (eds) Handbook of statistical genetics. Wiley, New York, pp 179-212.
13. Nordborg M, Krone SM (2002) Separation of time scales and convergence to the coalescent in structured populations. In: Slatkin M, Veuille M (eds) Modern developments in theoretical population genetics: the Legacy of Gustave Malecot. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 194-232.
14. Notohara M (1990) The coalescent and the genealogical process in geographically structured population. J Math Biol 29: 59-75.
15. Notohara M (1993) The strong-migration limit for the genealogical process in geographically structured populations. J Math Biol 31: 115-122.
16. Notohara M (1997) The number of segregating sites in a sample of DNA sequences from a geographically structured population. J Math Biol 36: 188-200.
17. Notohara M (2000) A perturbation method for the structured coalescent with strong migration. J Appl Probab 37: 148-167.
18. Notohara M, Umeda T (2006) The coalescence time of sampled genes in the structured coalescent model. Theor Popul Biol 70: 289-299.
19. Sano A, Shimizu A, Iizuka M (2004) Coalescent process with fluctuating population size and its effective size. Theor Popul Biol 65: 39-48.
20. Sjödin P, Kaj I, Krone S, Lascoux M, Nordborg M (2005) On the meaning and existence of an effective population size. Genetics 169: 1061-1070.
21. Takahata N (1988) The coalescent in two partially isolated diffusion populations. Genet Res Camb 52: 213-222.
22. Wakeley J, Sargsyan O (2009) Extensions of the coalescent effective population size. Genetics 181: 341-345.
23. Wilkinson-Herbots HW (1998) Genealogy and subpopulation differentiation under various models of population structure. J Math Biol 37: 535-585.