On generalization of constitutive models from two dimensions to three dimensions

International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics

Volumn 32, Issue 17, 2008, Pages 2045-2065

  Khalili, N ^a   Liu, M D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Constitutive relations; Model generalization; Plasticity

Indexed keywords

AXIALLY SYMMETRIC; CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS; EXISTING METHOD; FAILURE CRITERIA; FAILURE CRITERION; GENERALIZED MODELS; GEOMATERIALS; MODEL GENERALIZATION; MODIFIED CAM-CLAY MODEL; PRINCIPAL STRESS SPACE; SOIL BEHAVIOUR; THREE DIMENSIONS; THREE-DIMENSIONAL STRESS; TWO DIMENSIONAL MODEL; TWO-DIMENSION; TWO-DIMENSIONAL STRESS;

CONSTITUTIVE MODELS; PLASTICITY; STRESS ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

GEOLOGIC MODELS;

CAM-CLAY MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSTITUTIVE EQUATION; FAILURE ANALYSIS; FAILURE MECHANISM; GEOMECHANICS; NUMERICAL MODEL; SOIL MECHANICS; STRAIN RATE; STRESS-STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; TWO-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

EID: 77956169104     PISSN: 03639061     EISSN: 10969853     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nag.740     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Lagioia R, Puzrin AM, Potts DM. A new versatile expression for yield and plastic potential surfaces. Computers and Geotechnics 1996; 19(3):171-191.
2. Gajo A, Muir Wood D. A kinematic hardening constitutive model for sands: the multiaxial formulation. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 1999; 23:925-964.
3. Liu MD, Carter JP. Structured Cam Clay Model. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 2002; 39(6):1313-1332.
4. Wheeler SJ, Naatanen A, Karstunen M, Lojander M. An anisotropic elastoplastic model for soft clays. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 2003; 40(2):403-418.
5. Dafalias YF, Manzari MT, Papadimitriou AG. Saniclay: simple anisotropic clay plasticity model. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 2006; 30:1231-1257.
6. Lade PV. Elastoplastic stress-strain theory for cohesionless soil with curved yield surfaces. International Journal of Solids and Structures 1977; 13(1):63-76.
7. Nakai T, Mihara Y. A new mechanical quantity for soils and its application to elastoplastic constitutive models. Soils and Foundations 1984; 24(2):82-94.
8. Collins IF, Houlsby GT. Application of the thermomechanical principles to the modeling of geotechnical materials. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 1997; 453:1975-2001.
9. Potts DM, Zdravkovic L. Finite Element Analysis in Geotechnical Engineering: Theory. Thomas Telford: London, 1999.
10. Kavvadas M, Amorosi A. A constitutive model for structured soils. G'eotechnique 2000; 50(3):263-273.
11. Yamada Y. Deformation characteristics of loose sand under three dimensional stress conditions. Ph.D. Thesis, Tokyo University, 1979.
12. Callisto L, Calabresi G. Mechanical behaviour of a natural soft clay. G'eotechnique 1998; 48(4):495-513.
13. Liu MD, Carter JP. A general strength criterion for geo-materials. International Journal of Geomechanics (ASCE) 2003; 3(3/4):253-259.
14. Argyris JH, Faust G, Szimat J, Warnke P, Willam K. Recent developments in finite element analyses of prestressed concrete reactor vessels. Nuclear Engineering and Design 1974; 28:42-75.
15. Sheng D, Sloan SW, Yu HS. Aspects of finite element implementation of critical state models. Computational Mechanics 2000; 26(2):185-196.
16. Arduino P, Macari EJ. Implementation of porous medial formulation for geomaterials. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ACME) 2001; 127(2):157-166.
17. Potts DM. Numerical analysis: a virtual dream or practical reality? G'eotechnique 2003; 53(6):535-573.
18. Liu MD, Carter JP. Evaluation of the Sydney soil model. Advances in Geotechnical Engineering: The Skempton Conference, London, vol. 1, 2004; 498-509.
19. Matsuoka H, Nakai T. A new failure criterion for soils in three dimensional stress. In Proceedings of the Conference on Deformation and Failure of Granular Materials, Vermeer PA et al. (eds), Delft, 1982; 253-263.
20. Khalili N, Habte MA, Valliappan S. A bounding surface plasticity model for cyclic loading of granular soils. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 2005; 63:1939-1960.
21. Sekiguch H, Ohta H. Induced anisotropy and time dependency in clays. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Tokyo, 1977; 229-238.
22. Pestana JM, Whittle AJ. Formulation of a unified constitutive model for clay and sands. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 1999; 23:1215-1243.
23. Gajo A, Muir Wood D. A new approach to anisotropic, bounding surface plasticity: general formulation and simulation of natural and reconstituted clay behaviour. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 2001; 25:207-241.
24. Muir-Wood D. Soil Behaviour and Critical State Soil Mechanics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1990.
25. Nakai T, Hinokio M. A simple elastoplastic model for normally and over consolidated soils with unified material parameters. Soils and Foundations 2004; 44(2):53-70.
26. Lade PV, Musante HM. Three-dimensional behaviour of remoulded clay. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering (ASCE) 1978; 104(2):193-209.
27. Dean ETR. Specific length and some constitutive models. G'eotechnique 1998; 48(1):1-32. 28.
28. Houlsby GT, Sharma RS. A conceptual model for the yielding and consolidation of clays. G'eotechnique 1999; 49(4):491-501.
29. Matsuoka H, Yao Y, Sun D. The Cam-Clay models revised by the SMP criterion. Soils and Foundations 1999; 39(1):81-95.