Detection of lymph nodes in pelvic malignancies with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

Clinical Imaging

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 361-366

  Saokar, Anuradha ^a   Islam, Tina ^a   Jantsch, Marion ^a   Saksena, Mansi A ^a   Hahn, Peter F ^a   Harisinghani, Mukesh G ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Lymph node metastasis; Lymphotropic nanoparticle enhanced MRI; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

BLADDER CANCERS; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; LYMPH NODE; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; SIZE RANGES;

BODY FLUIDS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; NANOMAGNETICS; NANOPARTICLES; PATHOLOGY; RESONANCE;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

BARIUM SULFATE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE; IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLADDER CANCER; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILIAC CREST; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBTURATOR NERVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; SACRUM; TUMOR VOLUME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LYMPH NODES; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS;

EID: 77956145900     PISSN: 08997071     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Roach M, DeSilvio M, Lawton C, et al. Phase III trial comparing whole-pelvic versus prostate-only radiotherapy and neoadjuvant versus adjuvant combined androgen suppression: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413. J Clin Oncol 2003, 21:1904-1911.
2. Jager GJ, Barentsz JO, Oosterhof GO, et al. Pelvic adenopathy in prostatic and urinary bladder carcinoma: MR imaging with a three-dimensional TI-weighted magnetization-prepared-rapid gradient-echo sequence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996, 167:1503-1507.
3. Anzai Y, Piccoli CW, Outwater EK, et al. Evaluation of neck and body metastases to nodes with ferumoxtran 10-enhanced MR imaging: phase III safety and efficacy study. Radiology 2003, 228:777-788.
4. de Jong IJ, Pruim J, Elsinga PH, et al. Visualization of prostate cancer with 11C-choline positron emission tomography. Eur Urol 2002, 42:18-23.
5. Lin WC, Hung YC, Yeh LS, et al. Usefulness of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to detect para-aortic lymph nodal metastasis in advanced cervical cancer with negative computed tomography findings. Gynecol Oncol 2003, 89:73-76.
6. Dooms GC, Hricak H, Crooks LE, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lymph nodes: comparison with CT. Radiology 1984, 153:719-728.
7. Mallampati GK, Siegelman ES MR imaging of the bladder. MR imaging of the bladder. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2004, 12:545-555.
8. Futterer JJ, Engelbrecht MR, Huisman HJ, et al. Staging prostate cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced endorectal MR imaging prior to radical prostatectomy: experienced versus less experienced readers. Radiology 2005, 237:541-549.
9. Tekes A, Kamel I, Imam K, et al. Dynamic MRI of bladder cancer: evaluation of staging accuracy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005, 184:121-127.
10. Yang WT, Lam WW, Yu MY, et al. Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000, 175:759-766.
11. Harisinghani MG, Barentsz J, Hahn PF, et al. Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2003, 348:2491-2499.
12. Brown G, Richards CJ, Bourne MW, et al. Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison. Radiology 2003, 227:371-377.
13. Kim JH, Beets GL, Kim MJ, et al. High-resolution MR imaging for nodal staging in rectal cancer: are there any criteria in addition to the size?. Eur J Radiol 2004, 52:78-83.
14. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ Computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007, 357:2277-2284.