Arthroplasty in the military: A preliminary experience with ProDisc-C and ProDisc-L

Neurosurgical Focus

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1-7

  Tumialán, Luis M ^a   Ponton, Ryan P ^a   Garvin, Angelina ^a   Gluf, Wayne M ^a  

^a NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Active duty military; Arthroplasty; Cervical; Lumbar; Outcomes

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; CERVICAL SPINE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MILITARY MEDICINE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SOLDIER; SPINE FUSION; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; DISKECTOMY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MIDDLE AGED; MILITARY MEDICINE; MILITARY PERSONNEL; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SPINAL FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77956143368     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10920684     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3171/2010.1.FOCUS102     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ahn PG, Kim KN, Moon SW, Kim KS, Changes in cervical range of motion and sagittal alignment in early and late phases after total disc replacement: radiographic follow-up exceeding 2 years. J Neurosurg Spine 11:688-695, 2009
2. Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Kershaw T, Shah RV, Pfeiffer F, Fenk-Mayer A, et al, Lumbar total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis in smokers versus nonsmokers: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine 31:992-997, 2006
3. Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Pfeiffer F, Fenk-Mayer A, Lawrence JP, Kershaw T, et al, Early results after ProDisc-C cervical disc replacement. J Neurosurg Spine 2:403-410, 2005
4. Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, Hochschuler SH, Geisler FH, Holt RT, et al, A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITÉ artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine 30:1565-1575, 2005
5. Chung SS, Lee CS, Kang CS, Lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc II: a prospective study with a 2-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:411-415, 2006
6. Cunningham BW, McAfee PC, Geisler FH, Holsapple G, Adams K, Blumenthal SL, et al, Distribution of in vivo and in vitro range of motion following 1-level arthroplasty with the CHARITÉ artificial disc compared with fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 8:7-12, 2008
7. Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Banco RJ, Bitan FD, Cappuccino A, Geisler FH, et al, Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITÉ artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up. Spine J 9:374-386, 2009
8. Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Hochschuler SH, Blumenthal SL, Fedder IL, Ohnmeiss DD, et al, Prospective randomized study of the CHARITÉ artificial disc: data from two investigational centers. Spine J 4 (6 Suppl):252S-259S, 2004
9. Hilibrand AS, Robbins M, Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J 4 (6 Suppl):190S-194S, 2004
10. Ledet EH, Sachs BL, Brunski JB, Gatto CE, Donzelli PS, Real-time in vivo loading in the lumbar spine: part Interbody implant: load cell design and preliminary results. Spine 25:2595-2600, 2000
11. McAfee PC, The indications for lumbar and cervical disc replacement. Spine J 4 (6 Suppl):177S-181S, 2004
12. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G, Adams K, Blumenthal S, Guyer RD, et al, A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITÉ artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine 30:1576-1583, 2005
13. McCalden RW, Naudie DD, Yuan X, Bourne RB, Radiographic methods for the assessment of polyethylene wear after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2323-2334, 2005
14. McCormick PC: The adjacent segment. J Neurosurg Spine 6:1-4, 2007
15. Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Zdeblick TA, Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 6:198-209, 2007
16. Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, Goldstein J, Zigler J, Tay B, et al, Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J 9:275-286, 2009
17. Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, Heller JG, Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients. Spine 32:2933-2932, 2007
18. Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, Heller JG, Clinical outcomes of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial with 24-month follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:481-491, 2007
19. Siepe CJ, Wiechert K, Khattab MF, Korge A, Mayer HM, Total lumbar disc replacement in athletes: clinical results, return to sport and athletic performance. Eur Spine J 16:1001-1013, 2007
20. Singh K, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ, Assessing the potential impact of total disc arthroplasty on surgeon practice patterns in North America. Spine J 4 (6 Suppl):195S-201S, 2004
21. Wilke H, Neef P, Hinz B, Seidel H, Claes L, Intradiscal pressure together with anthropometric data-a data set for the validation of models. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 16 (Suppl 1):S111-S126, 2001
22. Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak JM, Linovitz RJ, Danielson GO III, Haider TT, et al, Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine 32:1155-1163, 2007