Evidence for male allocation in pipefish?

Nature

Volumn 466, Issue 7310, 2010, Pages

  Gwynne, Darryl T ^a   Judge, Kevin A ^b   Kelly, Clint D ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LETHBRIDGE   (Canada)

^c IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EMBRYO (ANATOMY); FISH; MALE; MATING; NONHUMAN; NOTE; PIPEFISH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGENY; REPRODUCTION; SEX ALLOCATION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SURVIVAL;

ANIMALS; BODY SIZE; CLUTCH SIZE; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; FEMALE; MALE; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SMEGMAMORPHA; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 77956135272     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature09275     Document Type: Note

References (7)

1. Jennions, M. D. & Kokko, H. in Evolutionary Behavioral Ecology (eds Westneat, D. F & Fox, C. W. ) 343-364 (Oxford University Press, 2010).
2. Paczolt, K. A. & Jones, A. G. Post-copulatory sexual selection and sexual conflict in the evolution of male pregnancy. Nature 464, 401-404 (2010).
3. Berglund, A. Pregnant fathers in charge. Nature 464, 364-365 (2010).
4. Fang, J. Male pipefish abort embryos of ugly mothers. Nature doi:10. 1038/news. 2010. 127 (published online 17 March 2010).
5. Kamler, E. Parent-egg-progeny relationships in teleost fishes: an energetics perspective. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 15, 399-421 (2005).
6. Bussière, L. F. , Basit, H. A. & Gwynne, D. T. Preferred males are not always good providers: female choice and male investment in tree crickets. Behav. Ecol. 16, 223-231 (2005).
7. Berglund, A. Many mates make male pipefish choosy. Behaviour 132, 213-218 (1995).