The health risk assessment and remediation guide limit value of typical chromium slag contaminated sites

Huanjing Kexue Xuebao/Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1445-1450

  Zhang, Houjian ^a,b   Wang, Xingrun ^a   Chen, Chunyun ^b   Liu, Xue ^a   Wang, Qi ^a  

^a CHINESE RESEARCH ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES   (China)

^b FUZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Chromium slag; Contaminated sites; Health based risk assessment; Restoration limit value

Indexed keywords

CHROMIUM; DESORPTION; DRILLING; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; HEALTH RISK; HYDROGEOLOGY; NUMERICAL MODEL; REMEDIATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SLAG; SOIL POLLUTION;

EID: 77956126287     PISSN: 02532468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). 2001. Canada-wide standards for petroleum hydrocarbons in soil[OL]. 2009-11-01, http://www.ccme.ca.
2. Cao Y Z, Shi L Y, Li L H, et al. 2007. Petroleum hydrocarbons-contaminated sites and related risk-based management strategy[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2(3): 265-272(in Chinese).
3. Duan X L, Wang Z S, Yu Y, et al. 2008. Health risk assessment for residents exposure to underground water near a landfill site[J], Environment Monitoring Management and Technology, 20(3): 19-23(in Chinese).
4. Ferguson C C. 1999. Assessing risk from contaminated sites: Policy and practice in 16 European countries[J]. Land Contamination and Reclamation, 7(2): 33-54.
5. Liu Y Q, Li L, Wang Q, et al. 2009. Study on pollution situation at typical chrome residue contaminated sites and corresponding integrated remediation plan[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 22(2): 249-253(in Chinese).
6. U. S. EPA. 1989. Exposure factors handbook[OL]. Washington DC: Office of Health and Environmental Assessment. 2009-11-01, http://www.epa.gov.
7. U. S. EPA. 2005. Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment[OL]. 2009-11-01, http://www.epa.gov.
8. U. S. EPA Office of Solid Waste. 1999a. Data collection for The hazardous waste identification rule: Section 9.0 Human receptor data[OL]. 2009-11-01, http://www.epa.gov.
9. U. S. EPA Office of Solid Waste. 1999b. Data collection for The hazardous waste identification rule: Section 10.0 Farm food chain and terrestrial foodweb data[OL]. 2009-11-01, http://www.epa.gov.
10. U. S. EPA. 1989. Risk assessment guidance for superfund: Human health evaluation manual[OL]. 2009-11-01, http://www.epa.gov.
11. U. S. EPA. 1998. Toxicological review of hexavalent chromium[OL]. 2009-11-01, http://www.epa.Gov/iris/to xreviews/0144-tr.pdf.
12. Wang G Q, Luo Y M, Song J. 2005. Study on soil environmental quality guidelines and standards I. international trend and suggestions for amendment in china[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 42(4): 666-673(in Chinese).
13. Wang H T. 2007. Dynamics of Fluid Flow and Contaminant Transport in Porous Media[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press. 250-296 (in Chinese).
14. Wcisto E, Ioven D, Kucharski R, et al. 2002. Human health risk assessment case study: An abandoned metal smelter site in Poland[J]. Chemosphere, 47: 507-515.
15. Zhang Y, Wu Y Z, Zong L G, et al. 2008. Health risk assessment: Case study of a brownfield contaminated by POPs at Changzhou[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 31(7): 135-140(in Chinese).
16. National Bureau of Statistics of China. 2007. China Statistical Yearbook2007[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press. 210-324(in Chinese).
17. Zhu C. 2008. Pollution and health impact assessment of relocation enterprises in Chongqing[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University. 37-45(in Chinese).