National quality campaigns: Who benefits?

Quality and Safety in Health Care

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 275-278

  Hansen, Luke O ^a   Herrin, Jeph ^b   Nembhard, Ingrid M ^b   Busch, Susan ^b   Yuan, Christina T ^b   Krumholz, Harlan M ^b   Bradley, Elizabeth H ^b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MASS COMMUNICATION; ONLINE SYSTEM; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PUBLIC RELATIONS; STANDARD; TIME; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES;

COHORT STUDIES; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; INTERINSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; LENGTH OF STAY; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77956106623     PISSN: 14753898     EISSN: 14753901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2009.036087     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Berwick DM, Calkins DR, McCannon CJ, et al. The 100, 000 lives campaign: setting a goal and a deadline for improving health care quality. JAMA 2006;295:324-7.
2. Hackbarth AD, McCannon CJ, Berwick DM. Interpreting the 'lives saved' result of IHI's 100, 000 lives campaign. Jt Comm Benchmark 2006;8:1-11.
3. Bradley EH, Nallamothu BK, Stern AF, et al. Contemporary evidence: baseline data from the D2B Alliance. BMC Res Notes 2008;1:23.
4. American College of Cardiology/Institute for Healthcare Improvement. H2H Quality. http://h2hquality.org/.
5. Schonlau M, Mangione-Smith R, Chan KS, et al. Evaluation of a quality improvement collaborative in asthma care: does it improve processes and outcomes of care? Ann Fam Med 2005;3:200-8.
6. Flamm BL, Berwick DM, Kabcenell A. Reducing cesarean section rates safely: lessons from a 'breakthrough series' Collaborative. Birth 1998;25:117-24.
7. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, et al. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q 2004;82:581-629.
8. Horbar JD, Rogowski J, Plsek PE, et al. Collaborative quality improvement for neonatal intensive care. Pediatrics 2001;107:14-22.
9. Leape LL, Kabcenell AI, Gandhi TK, et al. Reducing adverse drug events: lessons from a breakthrough series collaborative. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2000;26:321-31.
10. Vargas RB, Mangione CM, Asch S, et al. Can a chroniccare model collaborative reduce heart disease risk in patients with diabetes? J Gen Intern Med 2007;22:215-22.
11. Levitt B, March JG. Organizational learning. Ann Rev Sociol 1988;14:319-40.
12. Huber GP. Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures. Org Sci 1991;2:88-115.
13. Krumholz HM, Bradley EH, Nallamothu BK, et al. A campaign to improve the timeliness of primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Door-to-Balloon: An Alliance for Quality. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008;1:97.
14. Bradley EH, Herrin J, Wang Y, et al. Strategies for reducing the door-to-balloon time in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2308-20.
15. American Hospital Association. The annual survey of hospitals database: documentation for 2004 data. Chicago, IL: American Hospital Association, 2004.
16. Gold M, Sparer M, Chu K. Medicaid managed care: lessons from five states. Health Aff (Millwood) 1996;15:153-66.
17. Rosenthal M, Frank R, Li Z, et al. Early experience with pay-for-performance from concept to practice. JAMA 2005;294:1788-93.
18. Mooney S, Ogrinc G, Steadman W. Improving emergency caesarean delivery response times at a rural community hospital. Br Med J 2007;16:60.