Rheumatoid arthritis of the hand: Monitoring with a simplified MR imaging scoring method - Preliminary assessment

Radiology

Volumn 256, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 863-869

  Cyteval, Catherine ^a   Miquel, Anne ^b   Hoa, Denis ^a   Daures, Jean Pierre ^c   Mariette, Xavier ^b   Combe, Bernard ^a  

^a LAPEYRONIE HOSPITAL   (France)

^b BICÊTRE HOSPITAL   (France)

^c DEPARTMENT OF NEUROLOGY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HAND EDEMA; HAND INJURY; HAND JOINT; HAND RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; REPRODUCIBILITY; RHEUMATIC HAND; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING SCORE; SCORING SYSTEM; SIMPLIFIED RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING SCORE; SYNOVITIS; WRIST;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; CONTRAST MEDIA; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HAND; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 77956099079     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10091759     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Boers M, Felson DT. Clinical measures in rheumatoid arthritis: which are most useful in assessing patients? J Rheumatol 1994;21(9):1773-1774.
2. American College of Rheumatology Subcommittee on Rheumatoid Arthritis Guidelines. Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis: 2002 update. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46(2):328-346.
3. Haavardsholm EA, Østergaard M, Hammer HB, et al. Monitoring anti-TNFalpha treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: responsiveness of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography of the dominant wrist joint compared with conventional measures of disease activity and structural damage. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68(10):1572-1579.
4. Østergaard M, Peterfy C, Conaghan P, et al. OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies: core set of MRI acquisitions, joint pathology definitions, and the OMERACT RA-MRI scoring system. J Rheumatol 2003;30(6):1385-1386.
5. Lassere M, McQueen F, Østergaard M, et al. OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Exercise 3: an international multicenter reliability study using the RA-MRI Score. J Rheumatol 2003;30(6):1366-1375. (Pubitemid 36666370)
6. Combe B, Benessiano J, Berenbaum F, et al. The ESPOIR cohort: a ten-year follow-up of early arthritis in France - methodology and baseline characteristics of the 813 included patients. Joint Bone Spine 2007;74(5):440-445.
7. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988;31(3):315-324.
8. van der Heijde D, Dankert T, Nieman F, Rau R, Boers M. Reliability and sensitivity to change of a simplification of the Sharp/van der Heijde radiological assessment in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 1999;38(10):941-947.
9. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33(1):159-174.
10. Durez P, Malghem J, Nzeusseu Toukap A, et al. Treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized magnetic resonance imaging study comparing the effects of methotrexate alone, methotrexate in combination with infliximab, and methotrexate in combination with intravenous pulse methylprednisolone. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56(12): 3919-3927. (Pubitemid 350262784)
11. Hetland ML, Ejbjerg B, Hørslev-Petersen K, et al. MRI bone oedema is the strongest predictor of subsequent radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis: results from a 2-year randomised controlled trial (CIMESTRA). Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68(3):384-390.
12. Gaylis NB, Needell SD. In-office magnetic resonance imaging to monitor responses to therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int 2009;30(2):269-273.
13. Conaghan P, Lassere M, Østergaard M, et al. OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Exercise 4: an international multicenter longitudinal study using the RA-MRI Score. J Rheumatol 2003;30(6):1376-1379. (Pubitemid 36666371)
14. Bird P, Ejbjerg B, McQueen F, Ostergaard M, Lassere M, Edmonds J. OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Exercise 5: an international multicenter reliability study using computerized MRI erosion volume measurements. J Rheumatol 2003;30(6):1380-1384. (Pubitemid 36666372)
15. Bird P, Joshua F, Lassere M, Shnier R, Edmonds J. Training and calibration improve inter-reader reliability of joint damage assessment using magnetic resonance image scoring and computerized erosion volume measurement. J Rheumatol 2005;32(8): 1452-1458.
16. Ejbjerg B, McQueen F, Lassere M, et al. The EULAR-OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis MRI reference image atlas: the wrist joint. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64(suppl 1):i23-i47. (Pubitemid 40193603)
17. van der Heijde DM. Joint erosions and patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1995;34(suppl 2):74-78. (Pubitemid 26013493)
18. Sharp JT, Young DY, Bluhm GB, et al. How many joints in the hands and wrists should be included in a score of radiologic abnormalities used to assess rheumatoid arthritis? Arthritis Rheum 1985;28(12): 1326-1335.
19. Ejbjerg BJ, Vestergaard A, Jacobsen S, Thomsen HS, Østergaard M. The smallest detectable difference and sensitivity to change of magnetic resonance imaging and radiographic scoring of structural joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis finger, wrist, and toe joints: a comparison of the OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging score applied to different joint combinations and the Sharp/van der Heijde radiographic score. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52(8):2300-2306.