Response to Comment

Nursing Ethics

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 668-671

  Wright, David ^a   Nyland, Amy ^b   Carnevale, Franco ^c   Gros, Catherine ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b MONTREAL CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COOPERATION; ETHICS; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; NOTE; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSE PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

COMMUNICATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE;

EID: 77956085456     PISSN: 09697330     EISSN: 14770989     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0969733010376358     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Crisci C., Arnone B. Comment. Nurs Ethics 2010; 17: 403.
2. Gallagher A., Li S., Wainwright P., Rees Jones I., Lee D. Dignity in the care of older people - a review of the theoretical and empirical literature. BMC Nurs 2008; 7(11): 1-12.
3. Oberle K., Bouchal SR Ethics in Canadian nursing practice: navigating the journey. Toronto, ON: Pearson Education Canada, 2009.
4. Hall BA An essay on an authentic meaning of medicalization: the patient's perspective. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 2003; 26(1): 53-62.
5. Peterson DI Developing the difficult patient. Am J Nurs 1967; 67: 522-5.
6. Kelly MP, May D. Good and bad patients: a review of the literature and a theoretical critique. J Adv Nurs 1982; 7: 147-56.