Pancreatitis bundles

Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 87-89

  Mayumi, Toshihiko ^a   Takada, Tadahiro ^b   Hirata, Koichi ^c   Yoshida, Masahiro ^d   Sekimoto, Miho ^e   Hirota, Masahiko ^f   Kimura, Yasutoshi ^c   Takeda, Kazunori ^g   Amano, Hodaka ^b   Wada, Keita ^b   Gabata, Toshifumi ^h   Arata, Shinjyu ⁱ   Hirota, Morihisa ^j   Yokoe, Masamichi ^k   Kiriyama, Seiki ^l   Shikata, Satoru ^e   Shirai, Kunihiro ^m   Nakayama, Takeo ^m   Ohtomo, Kuni ⁿ   Tanaka, Masao ^o   Shimosegawa, Tooru ^j   more..

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b TEIKYO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c SAPPORO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH AND WELFARE   (Japan)

^e KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^f National Hospital Organization   (Japan)

^g SENDAI CITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Japan)

^h KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

ⁱ YOKOHAMA CITY UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Japan)

^j TOHOKU UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^k NAGOYA DAINI RED CROSS HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^l OGAKI MUNICIPAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^m GIFU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^o KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

more..

Author keywords

Clinical indicators; Guidelines; Pancreatitis; Pancreatitis bundle

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ACUTE PANCREATITIS; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ARTICLE; CHOLANGITIS; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL INDICATOR; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DISEASE CONTROL; DISEASE SEVERITY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; JAPAN; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PAIN; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT MONITORING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROGNOSIS; PROPHYLAXIS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PANCREATITIS;

GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PANCREATITIS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE;

EID: 77956085435     PISSN: 18686974     EISSN: 18686982     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00534-009-0219-y     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. The AGREE Collaboration. Appraisal of guidelines for research & evaluation (AGREE) instrument. (http://www.agreecollaboration.org).
2. Gao F, Melody T, Daniels DF, Giles S, Fox S. The impact of compliance with 6-hour and 24-hour sepsis bundles on hospital mortality in patients with severe sepsis: A prospective observational study. Crit Care. 2005;9:R764-70.
3. Nguyen HB, Corbett SW, Steele R, Banta J, Clark RT, Hayes SR, et al. Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortality. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:1012-105.
4. Ferrer R, Artigas A, Levy MM, et al. Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain. JAMA. 2008;299:2294-303. (Pubitemid 351724396)
5. Galpern D, Guerrero A, Tu A, Fahoum B, Wise L. Effectiveness of a central line bundle campaign on line-associated infections in the intensive care unit. Surgery. 2008;144:492-5.
6. Berriel-Cass D, Adkins FW, Jones P, Fakih MG. Eliminating nosocomial infections at Ascension Health. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006;32:612-20.
7. Crocker C, Kinnear W. Weaning from ventilation: Does a care bundle approach work? Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2008;24:180-6.
8. De Miguel-Yanes JM, Andueza-Lillo JA, Gonzalez-Ramallo VJ, et al. Failure to implement evidence-based clinical guidelines for sepsis at the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2006;24:553-9. (Pubitemid 44287257)
9. McNeill G, Dixon M, Jenkins P. Can acute medicine units in the UK comply with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign's six-hour care bundle? Clin Med. 2008;8:163-5. (Pubitemid 351579199)