Modeling effects of granules on the start-up of anaerobic digestion of dairy wastewater with Langmuir and extended Freundlich equations

Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 833-845

  Pandey, Pramod K ^a   Ndegwa, Pius M ^b   Alldredge, J Richard ^b   Pitts, Marvin ^b   Soupir, M L ^a  

^a Iowa State University   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Dairy manure; Extended Freundlich model; Granules; Langmuir model; SEM and TEM; Start up

Indexed keywords

DAIRY MANURES; EXTENDED FREUNDLICH MODEL; GRANULES; LANGMUIR MODELS; SEM AND TEM; START-UPS;

BATCH REACTORS; BIOGAS; ELECTRON MICROSCOPES; GRANULATION; MANURES; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; WASTEWATER;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

BIOGAS;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM COLONY; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAIRY INDUSTRY; GRAM NEGATIVE BACTERIUM; MANURE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; METHANOGEN; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SYNTROPHOBACTER; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

BACTERIA, ANAEROBIC; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DAIRYING; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; WATER MICROBIOLOGY; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WATER PURIFICATION;

SYNTROPHOBACTER;

EID: 77956057956     PISSN: 16157591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00449-010-0406-x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. USDA-SCS (1992) Agricultural waste management field handbook. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
2. ME Griffin KD McMahon RI Mackie L Raskin 1998 Methanogenic population dynamics during start-up of anaerobic digesters treating municipal solid waste and biosolids Biotechnol Bioeng 57 342 355 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19980205)57: 3<342::AID-BIT11>3.0.CO;2-I (Pubitemid 28028415)
3. KY Show Y Wang SF Foong JH Tay 2004 Accelerated start-up and enhanced granulation in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors Water Res 38 2293 2304 10.1016/j.watres.2004.01.039 (Pubitemid 38622150)
4. VA Vavilin I Angelidaki 2005 Anaerobic degradation of solid material: importance of initiation centers for methanogenesis, mixing intensity, and 2D distributed model Biotechnol Bioeng 89 113 122 10.1002/bit.20323 (Pubitemid 40110989)
5. KD McMahon PG Stroot RI Mackie L Raskin 2001 Anaerobic codigestion of municipal solid waste and biosolids under various mixing conditions-II: microbial population dynamics Water Res 35 1817 1827 10.1016/S0043-1354(00) 00438-3 (Pubitemid 32201491)
6. HHP Fang 2000 Microbial distribution in UASB granules and its resulting effects Water Sci Technol 42 201 208
7. JE Schmidt BK Ahring 1996 Granular sludge formation in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors Biotechnol Bioeng 49 229 246 10.1002/(SICI)1097- 0290(19960205)49:3<229::AID-BIT1>3.0.CO;2-M (Pubitemid 26032679)
8. G Lettinga AFM Van Velsen SW Hobma W Zeeuw A Klapwijk 1980 Use of the upflow sludge blanket (USB) reactor concept for biological wastewater treatment, especially for anaerobic treatment Biotechnol Bioeng 22 699 734 10.1002/bit.260220402
9. LW Hulshoff Pol SI De Castro Lopes G Lettinga PN Lens 2004 Anaerobic sludge granulation Water Res 38 1376 1389 10.1016/j.watres.2003.12.002 (Pubitemid 38317371)
10. MI Baloch JC Akunna M Kierans PJ Collier 2008 Structural analysis of anaerobic granules in a phase separated reactor by electron microscopy Bioresour Technol 99 922 929 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.03.016 (Pubitemid 350258682)
11. MI Baloch JC Akunna PJ Collier 2007 The performance of a phase separated granular bed bioreactor treating brewery wastewater Bioresour Technol 98 1849 1855 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.06.014 (Pubitemid 46206111)
12. DJ Batstone J Keller LL Blackall 2004 The influence of substrate kinetics on the microbial community structure in granular anaerobic biomass Water Res 38 1390 1404 10.1016/j.watres.2003.12.003 (Pubitemid 38317372)
13. ZI Bhatti K Furkukawa M Fujita 1995 Comparative composition and characteristics of methanogenic granular sludges treating industrial wastes under different conditions J Ferment Bioeng 79 273 280 10.1016/0922-338X(95) 90616-8
14. CCV Cruz ACA Da Costa CA Henriques AS Luna 2004 Kinetic modeling and equilibrium studies during cadmium biosorption by dead Sargassum sp. biomass Bioresour Technol 91 249 257 10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00194-9 (Pubitemid 37371938)
15. E Sibbesen 1981 Some new equations to describe phosphate sorption by soils J Soil Sci 32 67 74 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1981.tb01686.x
16. H Hussein SF Ibrahim K Kandeel H Moawad 2004 Biosorption of heavy metals from waste water using Pseudomonas sp Electron J Biotechnol 7 30 37 10.2225/vol7-issue1-fulltext-2
17. Dianati-Tilaki RA (2003) Study on removal of cadmium from water environment by adsorption on GAC, BAC, and biofilter. In: Proceeding of the 7th international conference-diffuse pollution and basin management, Dublin, Ireland
18. E Guibal I Saucedo M Jansson-Charrier B Delanghe P Cloirec 1994 Uranium and vanadium sorption by chitosan and derivatives Water Sci Technol 30 183 190
19. T Varzakas D Arapoglou C Israilides 2006 Kinetics of endoglucanase and endoxylanase uptake by soybean seeds J Biosci Bioeng 101 111 119 10.1263/jbb.101.111 (Pubitemid 44354377)
20. RA Dianati-Tilaki AH Mahvi M Shariat S Nasseri 2004 Study of cadmium removal from environmental water by biofilm covered granular activated carbon Iranian J Publ Health 33 43 52
21. APHA (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th edn. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environmental Federation, Washington, DC
22. AR Howgrave-Graham FM Wallis 1993 Quantification of bacterial morphotypes within anaerobic digester granules from transmission electron micrographs using image analysis Biotechnol Tech 7 143 148 10.1007/BF00157386
23. BT Dudley AR Howgrave-Graham AG Bruton FM Wallis 1993 The application of digital image processing to quantifying and measuring UASB digester granules Biotechnol Bioeng 42 279 283 10.1002/bit.260420303
24. B Benguella H Benaissa 2002 Cadmium removal from aqueous solution by chitin: kinetic and equilibrium studies Water Res 36 2463 2474 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00459-6 (Pubitemid 34575597)
25. DA Ratkowsky 1986 A statistical study of seven curves for describing the sorption of phosphate by soil J Soil Sci 37 183 189 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1986. tb00018.x
26. G Lettinga 1995 Anaerobic digestion and wastewater treatment systems Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 67 3 28 10.1007/BF00872193
27. PL McCarty 2001 The development of anaerobic treatment and its future Water Sci Technol 44 149 156
28. Y Sekiguchi Y Kamagata K Nakamura K Syutsubo A Ohashi H Harada K Nakamura 1998 Diversity of mesophilic and thermophilic granular sludge determined by 16S rRNA gene analysis Microbiology 22 2655 2665 10.1099/00221287-144-9-2655
29. HJM Harmsen ADL Akkermans AJM Stams WM De Vos 1996 Population dynamics of propionate-oxidizing bacteria under methanogenic and sulfidogenic conditions in anaerobic granular sludge Appl Environ Microbiol 62 2163 2168
30. FA Macleod SR Guiot JW Costerton 1990 Layered structure of bacterial aggregates produced in an upflow anaerobic sludge bed and filter reactor Appl Environ Microbiol 56 1598 1607
31. L Morvai P Mihaltz L Czako J Hollo 1991 Application of UASB-reactors in industrial wastewater treatment: performance data and results in granulation control Acta Biotechnol 11 409 418 10.1002/abio.370110502
32. W Wu RF Hickey JG Zeikus 1991 Characterization of metabolic performance of methanogenic granules treating brewery wastewater: role of sulfate-reducing bacteria Appl Environ Microbiol 57 3438 3449
33. D Sow B Ollivier P Viaud JL Garcia 1989 Mesophilic and thermophilic methane fermentation of Euphorbia tirucalli Microb Biotechnol 5 547 550 10.1007/BF01741832
34. K Fiebig G Gottshalk 1983 Methanogenesis from choline by coculture of Desulfovibrio spp. and Methanosarcina barki Appl Environ Microbiol 45 161 168
35. MF Whitford RM Teather RJ Forster 2001 Phylogenetic analysis of methanogens from the bovine rumen BMC Microbiol 1 5 10.1186/1471-2180-1-5
36. GN Jarvis C Strompl DM Burgess LC Skillman ER Moore KN Joblin 2000 Isolation and identification of ruminal methanogens from grazing cattle Curr Microbiol 40 327 332 10.1007/s002849910065
37. Stewart CS, Flint HJ, Bryant MP (1997) The rumen bacteria. In: Hobson PN, Stewart CS (eds) The rumen microbial ecosystem, 2nd edn. Blackie Academic and Professional, New York
38. TA McAllister EK Okine GW Mathison KJ Cheng 1996 Dietary, environmental and microbiological aspects of methane production in ruminants Can J Anim Sci 76 231 243 10.4141/cjas96-035
39. WG Bergen 2004 Quantitative determination of rumen ciliate protozoal biomass with real-time PCR J Nutr 134 3223 3224
40. M Tokura I Chagan K Ushida Y Kojima 1999 Phylogenetic study of methanogens associated with rumen ciliates Curr Microbiol 39 123 128 10.1007/s002849900432 (Pubitemid 29385982)
41. Coleman GS (1979) Rumen ciliate protozoa. In: Levandowsky M, Hunter SH (eds) Biochemistry and physiology of protozoa, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York
42. PALNS Samsoon RE Loewenthal MC Wentzel G Marais 1990 Effect of nitrogen limitation on pelletization in upflow anaerobic sludge bed (UASB) systems Water Res 16 165 170 (Pubitemid 20731380)
43. HHP Fang 1997 Inhibition of bioactivity of UASB biogranules by electroplating metals Pure Appl Chem 69 2425 2429 10.1351/pac199769112425
44. PG Stroot KD McMahon RI Mackie L Raskin 2001 Anaerobic codigestion of municipal solid waste and biosolids under various mixing conditions-I: digester performance Water Res 35 1804 1816 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00439-5 (Pubitemid 32201490)
45. DR Lovely 1985 Minimum threshold for hydrogen metabolism in methanogenic bacteria Appl Environ Microbiol 49 1530 1531
46. TG Shea WA Pretorius RD Cole EA Pearson 1968 Kinetics of hydrogen assimilation in the methane fermentation Water Res 2 833 848 10.1016/0043-1354(68)90038-9
47. J Ejlertsson A Karlsson A Lagerkvist T Hjertberg BH Svensson 2003 Effects of co-disposal of wastes containing organic pollutants with municipal solid waste-a landfill simulation reactor study Adv Environ Res 7 949 960 10.1016/S1093-0191(02)00099-0 (Pubitemid 36681510)
48. F Raposo CJ Banks I Siegert S Heaven R Borja 2006 Influence of inoculum to substrate ratio on the biochemical methane potential of maize in batch tests Process Biochem 41 1444 1450 10.1016/j.procbio.2006.01.012
49. F Raposo R Borja MA Martín A Martín MA de la Rubia B Rincón 2009 Influence of inoculum-substrate ratio on the anaerobic digestion of sunflower oil cake in batch mode: process stability and kinetic evaluation Chem Eng J 149 70 77 10.1016/j.cej.2008.10.001
50. Guangqing Liu Z Ruihong HamedM El-Mashad D Renjie 2009 Effect of feed to inoculum ratios on biogas yields of food and green wastes Bioresour Technol 100 5103 5108 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.081
51. Cristina Gonzalez-Fernandez A Pedro Garcia-Encina 2009 Impact of substrate to inoculum ratio in anaerobic digestion of swine slurry Biomass Bioenerg 33 1065 1069 10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.03.008
52. MA Barlaz DM Schaefer RK Ham 1989 Bacterial population development and chemical characteristics of refuse decomposition in a simulated sanitary landfill Appl Environ Microbiol 55 55 65
53. K Karim R Hoffmann K Thomas Klasson MH Al-Dahhan 2005 Anaerobic digestion of animal waste: effect of mode of mixing Water Res 39 3597 3606 10.1016/j.watres.2005.06.019
54. Dubourguier HC, Archer DB, Albagnac G, Prensier G (1988) Structure and metabolism of methanogenic microbial conglomerates. In: Hall ER, Hobson PN (eds) Anaerobic digestion. Pergamon Press, Oxford