The context and the sitbac models for privacy preservationan experimental comparison of model comprehension and synthesis

IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering

Volumn 22, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1475-1488

  Beimel, Dizza ^a   Peleg, Mor ^b  

^a RUPPIN ACADEMIC CENTER   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

Access control; Authorization; Conceptual model; Knowledge representation; Ontology.; RBAC; SitBAC

Indexed keywords

ACCESS CONTROL MODELS; ACCESS CONTROL POLICIES; ACCESS TIME; AUTHORIZATION; CONCEPTUAL MODEL; CONTEXT MODELS; CONTROLLED EXPERIMENT; DATA ACCESS; EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON; FORMAL REPRESENTATIONS; HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATIONS; LOGICAL EXPRESSIONS; PATIENT DATA; RBAC; ROLE-BASED ACCESS CONTROL; SITBAC; TASK COMPLEXITY;

EXPERIMENTS; HOSPITAL DATA PROCESSING; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; ONTOLOGY; SECURITY SYSTEMS;

ACCESS CONTROL;

EID: 77956056341     PISSN: 10414347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TKDE.2009.161     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. R. Morgan, "Community Attitudes to Privacy," Office of the Australian Federal Privacy Commissioner, 2001.
2. R.S. Sandhu, E.J. Coyne, and C.E. Youman, "Role-Based Access Control Models," Computer, vol.29, no.2, pp. 38-47, Feb. 1996.
3. R. Sandhu, "The NIST Model for Role-Based Access Control: Toward a Unified Standard," Proc. Fifth ACM Workshop Role-Based Access Control, 2000.
4. J.B.D. Joshi, W.G. Aref, A. Ghafoor, and E.H. Spafford, "Security Models for Web-Based Applications," Comm. ACM, vol.44, no.2, pp. 38-44, 2001.
5. G. Motta and S. Furuie, "A Contextual Role-Based Access Control Authorization Model for Electronic Patient Record," IEEE Trans. Information Technology in Biomedicine, vol.7, no.3, pp. 202-207, Sept. 2003.
6. M. Peleg, D. Beimel, D. Dori, and Y. Denekamp, "Situation-Based Access Control: Privacy Management via Modeling of Patient Data Access Scenarios," J. Biomedical Informatics, vol.41, no.6, pp. 1028-1040, 2008.
7. R. Davis, H. Shrobe, and P. Szolovits, "What Is a Knowledge Representation?" AI Magazine, vol.14, no.1, pp. 17-33, 1993.
8. J.H. van Bemmel and M.A. Musen, Handbook of Medical Informatics. Springer, 1997.
9. T.R. Gruber, "Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing," Int'l J. Human-Computer Studies, vol.43, nos. 5/6, pp. 907-928, 1995.
10. N.F. Noy and D.L. McGuinness, "Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology," Technical Report SMI- 2001-10880, Stanford Medical Informatics, 2001.
11. T.R.G. Green and M. Petre, "Usability Analysis of Visual Programming Environments: A 'Cognitive Dimensions' Framework," J. Visual Languages and Computing, vol.7, no.2, pp. 131-174, 1996.
12. J.C. Spohrer and E. Soloway, "Novice Mistakes: Are the Folk Wisdoms Correct? Studying the Novice Programmer," Comm. ACM, vol.29, no.7, pp. 624-632, 1986.
13. V.L. Patel, J.F. Arocha, M. Diermeier, E.H. Shortliffe, and R.A. Greenes, "Methods of Cognitive Analysis to Support the Design and Evaluation of Biomedical Systems: The Case of Clinical Practice Guidelines," J. Biomedical Informatics, vol.34, no.1, pp. 52-66, 2000.
14. V.L. Patel, J.F. Arocha, and D.R. Kaufman, "A Primer on Aspects of Cognition for Medical Informatics," J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc., vol.8, no.4, pp. 324-343, 2001.
15. A.L. Rector, N. Drummond, M. Horridge, J. Rogers, H. Knublauch, R. Stevens, H. Wang, and C. Wroe, "Designing User interfaces to Minimise Common Errors in Ontology Development: The CO-ODE and HyOntUse Projects," Proc. UK E-Science All Hands Meeting, 2004.
16. B.S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. Addison Wesley, 1956.
17. A. Gómez-Pérez and O. Corcho, "Ontology Languages for the Semantic Web," IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol.17, no.1, pp. 54-60, Jan./Feb. 2002.
18. M. Peleg and D. Dori, "The Model Multiplicity Problem: Experimenting with Real-Time Specification Methods," IEEE Trans. Software Eng., vol.26, no.8, pp. 742-759, Aug. 2000.
19. P. Shoval and I. Frumermann, "OO and EER Conceptual Schemas: A Comparison of User Comprehension," Database Management, vol.5, no.4, pp. 28-38, 1994.
20. D. Batra, J.A. Hoffer, and R.P. Bostrom, "Comparing Representations with Relational and EER Models," Comm. ACM, vol.33, no.2, pp. 126-139, 1990.
21. P. Palvia, C. Liao, and P.L. To, "The Impact of Conceptual Models on End-User Performance," J. Database Management, vol.3, no.4, pp. 4-15, 1992.
22. P. Shoval and S. Shiran, "Entity-Relationship and Object-Oriented Data Modeling-An Experimental Comparison of Design Quality," Data and Knowledge Eng., vol.21, no.3, pp. 297-315, 1997.
23. P. Shoval, R. Danoch, and M. Balaban, "Hierarchical Entity Relationship Diagrams-The Model, Method of Creation and Experimental Evaluation," Requirements Eng. J., vol.9, no.4, pp. 217-228, 2004.
24. M.C. Otero and J.J. Dolado, "An Initial Experimental Assessment of the Dynamic Modelling in UML," Empirical Software Eng. J., vol.7, no.1, pp. 27-47, 2002.
25. F.H. Lochovsky and D.C. Tsichritzis, "User Performance Considerations in DBMS Selection," Proc. ACM SIGMOD, pp. 128-134, 1977.
26. I.K. Sjøberg et al., "A Survey of Controlled Experiments in Software Engineering," IEEE Trans. Software Eng., vol.31, no.9, pp. 733-753, Sept. 2005.
27. M. Peleg, D. Wang, A. Fodor, S. Keren, and E. Karnieli, "Lessons Learned from Adapting a Generic Narrative Diabetic-Foot Guideline to an Institutional Decision-Support System," Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol.139, pp. 243-252, 2008.
28. E. Shalom, Y. Shahar, E. Lunenfeld, M. Taieb-Maimon, O. Young, D. Goren-Bar, S. Martins, L. Vaszar, Y. Liel, A. Yarkoni, M.K. Goldstein, A. Leibowitz, and T. Marom, "The Importance of Creating an Ontology-Specific Consensus before a Markup-Based Specification of Clinical Guidelines," Proc. Biennial European Conf. Artificial Intelligence, 2006.
29. Ruby Community, "Ruby Language Home Page," http:// www.ruby-lang.org/en/, 2010.
30. W.E. Grosso, H. Eriksson, R. Fergerson, J.H. Gennari, S.W. Tu, and M.A. Musen, "Knowledge Modeling at the Millennium (The Design and Evolution of Protege-2000)," Proc. 12th Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, 1999.
31. S. Siegel, Non-Parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, 1956.
32. L.C. Briand, Y. Labiche, M. DiPenta, and H.D. Yan-Bondoc, "An Experimental Investigation of Formality in UML-Based Development," IEEE Trans. Software Eng., vol.31, no.10, pp. 833-849, Oct. 2005.
33. C.J. Hou, M.A. Musen, and N.F. Noy, "EZPAL: Environment for Composing Constraint Axioms by Instantiating Templates," Int'l J. Human-Computer Studies, vol.62, no.5, pp. 578-596, 2005.