Appreciative evaluation - a form of formative evaluation;Evaluarea apreciativǎ - formǎ a evaluǎrii formative

Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 42-48

  Cojocaru, Stefan ^a  

^a ALEXANDRU IOAN CUZA UNIVERSITY OF IASI   (Romania)

Author keywords

Appreciative evaluation; Appreciative inquiry; Appreciative interview; Formative evaluation; Program evaluation; Summative evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956052127     PISSN: 15833410     EISSN: 15845397     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Birckmayer, J.D., Weiss, C.H., 2000, "Theory-based evaluation in practice: what do we learn?", Evaluation review, 24 (4), pp. 407-431.
2. Chelimsky, E., 1978, "Differing perspectives of evaluation", în Rentz, C. C. şi Rentz, R. R. (eds.), Evaluating Federally sponsored programs: new directions for program evaluation 2, pp. 19-38, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
3. Chen, H.T., 1990, Theory-driven evaluation, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
4. Chen, H.T., Rossi, P.H., 1983, "Evaluating with sense: the theory-driven evaluation", Evaluation Review, vol. 7, pp.283-302.
5. Cojocaru, S., 2005, Metode apreciative în asistenţa socialǎ. Ancheta, supervizarea şi managementul de caz, Polirom, Iaşi.
6. Cojocaru, S., 2006, Proiectul de intervenţie în asistenţa socialǎ. De la propunerea de finanţare la planurile individualizate de intervenţie, Polirom, Iasi.
7. Cooksy, L.J., Gill, P., Kelly, P.A., 2001, "The program logic model as an integrative framework for a multimethod evaluation", Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 24, pp. 119-128.
8. Cooperrider, D, An appreciative interview with Peter Drucker, http://appreciativeinquiry.case.edu/uploads/ACF13FB.doc, 2007, septembrie 21.
9. Crowley, K.M., Yu, P., Kaftarian, S.J., 2000, "Prevention actions and activities make a difference: a structural equation model of coalition building", Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 23, pp. 381-388.
10. Doherty, J.E, Rispel, L.C, 1995, "From conflict to cohesion: involving stakeholders in policy research", Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 409-415.
11. Hahn, T., Lavery, T., Stevenson, P., 2006, Enhancing and evaluating local juvenile justice szstems in Illinois: an evaluation manual, http://www.jrsa.org/jjec/state_info/reports/illinois-evaluation-manual.pdf, decembrie 2006.
12. Krogsrud Miley, K., O'Melia, D., DuBois, B., 2004/2006, Practica asistenţei sociale. Abordarea participativǎ, Polirom, Iaşi.
13. Love, A.J., Russon, C., 2000, Building a worldwide evaluation community: past, present and future, Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 23, pp. 449-459.
14. Mǎţǎuan, G., 1999, Evaluarea programelor sociale, Expert, Bucureşti.
15. Papineau, D., Kiely, M.C., 1996, "Participatory evaluation in a community organization: fostering stakeholder empowerment and utilization", Evaluation and program planning, vol. 19, pp. 79-93.
16. Patton, M.Q., 1988, "The evaluator's responsibility for utilization", Evaluation Practice, vol. 9(2), pp. pp. 5-24.
17. Patton, M.Q., 2001, Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd edition, Sage Publications, Thousands Oaks, California.
18. Preskill, H., Tzavaras Catsambas, T., 2006, Reframing evaluation through appreciative inquiry, Sage Sage Publications, Thousands Oaks, California.
19. Rossi, P.H., Freeman, H.E., 1993, Evaluation. A systematic approach, 5th edition, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California.
20. Scriven, M., 1967, The methodology of evaluation, Rand- McNally, Chicago.
21. Stake, R.E., 1967, "Countenance of educational evaluation", Teachers College Records, vol. 68, pp. 523-540.
22. Stufflebeam, D.L., 1983, "The CIPP model for program evaluation", în Madaus, G.F., Scriven, M.S., Stufflebeam, D.L., Evaluation models: viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation, Kluwer, Hingham, pp. 117-141.
23. Weiss, C.H., 1972, Evaluation research: methods of assessing program effectiveness, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
24. Weiss, C.H., 1997, "How can theory-based evaluation make greater headway", Evaluation Review, Vol. 21 (4), pp. 501-524.
25. Westat, J. F., Frierson, H., Hood, S., Hughes, G., Katzenmeyer, C., 2002, The 2002 user friendly handbook for project evaluation, The National Science Foundation, Directorate for Education and Human Resources, Division of Research, Evaluation and Communication, Arlington.