Belief-goal relationships in possibilistic goal generation

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 215, Issue , 2010, Pages 641-646

  Da Costa Pereira, Célia ^a   Tettamanzi, Andrea G B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORMALISATION; POSSIBILISTIC; POSSIBILITY THEORY; RATIONAL AGENTS; SIDE EFFECT; THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 77956048332     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-606-5-641     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. D. Baker, 'Ambivalent desires and the problem with reduction', Philosophical Studies, Published online: 25 March, (2009).
2. S. Benferhat and S. Kaci, 'Logical representation and fusion of prioritized information based on guaranteed possibility measures: application to the distance-based merging of classical bases', Artif. Intell., 148(1- 2), 291-333, (2003).
3. J. Blee, D. Billington, and A. Sattar, 'Reasoning with levels of modalities in BDI logic', in Proceedings of PRIMA'07, pp. 410-415. Springer- Verlag, (2009).
4. M. Bratman, Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1987.
5. A. Casali, L. Godo, and C. Sierra, 'Graded BDI models for agent architectures', in CLIMA V, pp. 18-33, (2004).
6. C. Castelfranchi and F. Paglieri, 'On the integration of goal dynamics and belief structures', Synthese, (2007).
7. P. R. Cohen and H. J. Levesque, 'Intention is choice with commitment', Artif. Intell., 42(2-3), 213-261, (1990).
8. C. da Costa Pereira and A. Tettamanzi, 'An integrated possibilistic framework for goal generation in cognitive agents', in Proceedings of AAMAS'10, pp. 1239-1246. IFAAMAS, (2010).
9. B. De Baets, E. Tsiporkova, and R. Mesiar, 'Conditioning in possibility theory with strict order norms', Fuzzy Sets Syst., 106(2), 221-229, (1999).
10. D. Dubois and H. Prade, 'A synthetic view of belief revision with uncertain inputs in the framework of possibility theory', International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 17, 295-324, (1997).
11. D. Dubois and H. Prade, 'An overview of the asymmetric bipolar representation of positive and negative information in possibility theory', Fuzzy Sets Syst., 160(10), 1355-1366, (2009).
12. P. Ǧardenfors, 'Belief revision: A vademecum', in Meta-Programming in Logic, 1-10, Springer, Berlin, (1992).
13. J. Lang, 'Conditional desires and utilities: an alternative logical approach to qualitative decision theory', in Proceedings of ECAI'96, pp. 318-322, (1996).
14. S. Parsons and P. Giorgini, 'An approach to using degrees of belief in BDI agents', in Information, Uncertainty, Fusion, Kluwer, (1999).
15. A. S. Rao and M. P. Georgeff, 'Decision procedures for BDI logics', J Logic Computation, 8(3), 293-343, (June 1998).
16. A.S. Rao and M.P. Georgeff, 'Asymmetry thesis and side-effect problems in linear-time and branching-time intention logics', in Proceedings of IJCAI'91, pp. 498-505, (1991).
17. A.S. Rao and M.P. Georgeff, 'Modeling rational agents within a BDIarchitecture', in Proceedings of KR'91, pp. 473-484, (1991).
18. M. Birna van Riemsdijk, Cognitive Agent Programming: A Semantic Approach, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Utrecht, 2006.
19. L. A. Zadeh, 'Fuzzy sets', Information and Control, 8, 338-353, (1965).