Bayesian network reasoning with uncertain evidences

International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowldege-Based Systems

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 539-564

  Peng, Yun ^a   Zhang, Shenyong ^a,b   Pan, Rong ^c  

^a Baltimore County   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^c NexTag Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian networks; belief update; probabilistic reasoning; uncertain evidence

Indexed keywords

BARIUM COMPOUNDS; ITERATIVE METHODS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

BAYESIA N NETWORKS; BELIEF UPDATE; FITTING PROCEDURE; ITERATIVE PROPORTIONAL FITTING; JEFFREYS; PROBABILISTIC REASONING; SOFT EVIDENCES; UNCERTAIN EVIDENCE; UNCERTAINTY; VIRTUAL EVIDENCES;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

EID: 77956043316     PISSN: 02184885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0218488510006696     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. H. H. Bock, A conditional iterative proportional fitting (CIPF) algorithm with applications in the statistical analysis of discrete spatial data, Bull. ISI, Contributed papers of 47th Session in Paris, Vol.1, 1989, pp. 141-142.
2. D. T. Bwon, A note on approximation to discrete probability distributions, Information and Control 2 (1959) 386-392.
3. H. Chan and A. Darwiche, On the revision of probabilistic beliefs using uncertain evidence, Artificial Intelligence 163 (2005) 67-90.
4. P. L. Combettes, The foundations of set theoretic estimation, Proceedings of IEEE 81(2) (February, 1993).
5. E. Cramer, Probability measures with given marginals and conditionals: I-projections and conditional iterative proportional fitting, Statistics and Decisions 18 (2000) 311-329.
6. I. Csiszár, Information-type measures of difference of probability distributions and indirect observation, Studia Sci. Math. Hungar. 2 (1967) 229-318.
7. I. Csiszar, I-divergence geometry of probability distributions and minimization problems, The Annuals of Probability 3(1) (1975) 146-158.
8. W. E. Deming and F. F. Stephan, On a least square adjustment of a sampled frequency table when the expected marginal totals are known, Ann. Math. Statist. 11 (1940) 427-444.
9. Z. Ding, Y. Peng and R. Pan, A Bayesian approach to uncertainty modeling in OWL ontology, in Proc. Int. Conf. Advances in Intelligent Systems ? Theory and Applications, November 2004, Luxembourg.
10. S. E. Fienberg, An iterative procedure for estimation in contingency tables, Ann. Math. Statist. 41(3) (1970) 907-917.
11. S. Haberman, The Analysis of Frequency Data (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1974).
12. R. Jeffrey, The Logic of Decisions, 2nd Edition (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1983).
13. R. Kruithof, Telefoonverkeersrekening, De Ingenieur, 52 (1937) 15-25.
14. S. Kullback and R. A. Leibler, On information and sufficiency, Ann. Math. Statist. 22 (1951) 79-86.
15. J. Pearl, Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference (Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, 1988).
16. J. Pearl, Jeffery's rule, passage of experience, and neo-Bayesianism, in Knowledge Representation and Defeasible Reasoning, eds. H. E. Kyburg, Jr., R. P. Loui and G. N. Carlson (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1990), pp. 245-265.
17. Y. Peng and Z. Ding, Modifying Bayesian networks by probability constraints, in Proc. 21st Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, July 2005, Edinburgh.
18. L. Rüschendorf, Convergence of the iterative proportional fitting procedure, Ann. Statist. 23(4) (1995) 1160-1174.
19. M. Valtorta, Y. Kim and J. Vomlel, Soft evidential update for probabilistic multiagent systems, Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 29(1) (2002) 71-106.
20. J. Vomlel, Methods of probabilistic knowledge integration, PhD Thesis, Department of Cybernetics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University, December 1999.
21. J. Vomlel, Integrating inconsistent data in a probabilistic model, J. Applied Non-Classical Logics 14(3) (2004) 1-20.
22. C. Wagner, Probability kinematics and commutativity, Philosophy of Science 69 (2002) 266-278.