Referent tracking for corporate memories

Handbook of Ontologies for Business Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 34-46

  Ceusters, Werner ^a   Smith, Barry ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b Institute for Formal Ontology and Medical Information Science   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956040662     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-660-0.ch003     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. ACORD. (2005). Data dictionary for global insurance industry. Retrieved June 8, 2007, from http://www.acord.org/dataDictionary/dataDictionary.htm.
2. AMICE-Consortium. (1989). Open system architecture for CIM, research reports of ESPRIT project 688 (Vol. 1). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
3. Beckett, R.C. (2000). A characterization of corporate memory as a knowledge system. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(4), 311-319.
4. Bertolazzi, P., Krusich, C., & Missikoff, M. (2001). An approach to the definition of a core enterprise ontology: CEO. Paper presented at the OES-SEO 2001 International Workshop on Open Enterprise Solutions: Systems, Experiences, and Organizations.
5. Bittner, T., & Smith, B. (2003). A theory of granular partitions. In M. Duckham, M.F. Goodchild & M.F. Worboy (Eds.), Foundations of geographic information science (pp. 117-151). London: Taylor & Francis Books.
6. Bunge, M. (1977). Treatise on basic philosophy, ontology I: The furniture of the world (Vol. 3). Boston: Reidel.
7. Ceusters, W. (2006). Towards a realism-based metric for quality assurance in ontology matching. In B. Bennett & C. Fellbaum (Eds.), Formal ontology in information systems (pp. 321-332). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
8. Ceusters, W., Elkin, P., & Smith, B. (2006). Referent tracking: The problem of negative findings. In A. Hasman, R. Haux, J.v.d. Lei, E.D. Clercq, & F. Roger-France (Eds.), Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. Ubiquity: Technologies for Better Health in Aging Societies. Proceedings of MIE2006 (Vol. 124, pp. 741-746). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
9. Ceusters, W., & Smith, B. (2006a). A realism-based approach to the evolution of biomedical ontologies. In Proceedings of AMIA 2006 (pp. 121-125).
10. Ceusters, W., & Smith, B. (2006b). Strategies for referent tracking in electronic health records. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 39(3), 362-378.
11. Ceusters, W., & Smith, B. (2007). Referent tracking for digital rights management. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 2(1),45-53.
12. Dietz, J.L.G., & Halpin, T.A. (2004). Using DEMO and ORM in concert: A case study. Advanced Topics in Database Research, 3, 218-236.
13. Donnelly, M., Bittner, T., & Rosse, C. (2006). A formal theory for spatial representation and reasoning in biomedical ontologies. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 36(1), 1-27.
14. Drew, R. (2006, March 20). In Google's shadow. Computerworld. Retrieved August 23, 2007 from http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/software/story/0,10801,109613,00.html
15. Fox, M.S. (1992). The TOVE project: Towards a common-sense model of the enterprise (Tech. Rep.). Enterprise Integration Laboratory.
16. Foxvog, D. (2005). Instances of instances modeled via higher-order classes. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Foundational Aspects of Ontologies (FOnt 2005) (pp. 46-54).
17. Geerts, G., & McCarthy, W.E. (2002). An ontological analysis of the primitives of the extended-REA enterprise information architecture. The International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 3, 1-16.
18. Goossenaerts, J., & Pelletier, C. (2003). Ontology and enterprise modeling. Retrieved June 8, 2007, from http://is.tm.tue.nl/staff/jgoossenaerts/4PublicPdf/PSIM%20book%20ch%205%20Ontol&EM.pdf
19. Grenon, P., Smith, B., & Goldberg, L. (2004). Biodynamic ontology: Applying BFO in the biomedical domain. In D.M. Pisanelli (Ed.), Ontologies in medicine (pp. 20-38). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
20. Haller, A., & Oren, E. (2006). A process ontology to represent semantics of different process and choreography meta-models. Retrieved June 8, 2007, from http://www.m3pe.org/deliverables/process-ontology.pdf
21. Hay, D., & Healy, K.A. (2000). Defining business rules ~ what are they really? (Final Report No. Revision 1.3). The Business Rule Group.
22. Hill, M. (2006). Service taxonomy and service ontologies deliver success to enterprise SOA. Service Oriented Architecture Webservices Journal, 6. Retrieved June 8, 2007, from http://webservices.sys-con.com/read/175385.htm
23. Hoopes, J. (1991). Peirce ON SIGNS. Writings on semiotic by Charles Sanders Peirce. Chapel Hill and London: The University of North Carolina Press
24. Huhns, M.N., & Stephens, L.M. (2002). Semantic bridging of independent enterprise ontologies. In K. Kosanke (Ed.), Enterprise inter- and intra-organizational integration: Building international consensus (pp. 83-90). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
25. IFOMIS. (2006, December). Basic formal ontology. Retrieved June 8, 2007, from http://www.ifomis.unisaarland.de/bfo/
26. Kühn, O., & Abecker, A. (1997). Corporate memories for knowledge management in industrial practice: Prospects and challenges. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 3(8), 929-954.
27. Marchand, D.A., Davenport, T.H., & Dixon, T. (2000). Financial times - Mastering information management, complete MBA companion in information management. London: FT Prentice Hall.
28. McCarthy, W.E. (1982). The REA accounting model: A generalized framework for accounting systems in a shared data environment. The Accounting Review, LVII(3), 554-578.
29. Noy, N.F., & McGuinness, D.L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology (No. KSL-01-05). Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory.
30. Osterwalder, A., Lagha, S.B., & Pigneur, Y. (2002). An ontology for developing e-business models. Paper presented at the IFIP DSIAge 2002.
31. Parsons, J., & Wand, Y. (2000). Emancipating instances from the tyranny of classes in information modeling. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 25(2), 228-268.
32. Partridge, C., & Stefanova, M. (2001). A synthesis of state of the art enterprise ontologies - work in progress. Retrieved June 8, 2007, from http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/632089.html
33. Rosenthal, A., Manola, F., & Seligman, L. (2001). Getting data to applications - why we fail - Part 1: Common fallacies. The Mitre Information Technology Advisor, 1(10), 1-2.
34. rd International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS 2004) (pp. 73-84). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
35. Smith, B., Ceusters, W., Klagges, B., Köhler, J., Kumar, A., Lomax, J., et al. (2005). Relations in biomedical ontologies. Genome Biology, 6(5), R46.
36. Smith, B., Ceusters, W., & Temmerman, R. (2005). Wüsteria. In R. Engelbrecht, A. Geissbuhler, C. Lovis, & G. Mihalas (Eds.), Connecting medical informatics and bio-informatics. Medical informatics Europe 2005 (pp. 647-652). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
37. Smith, B., Kusnierczyk, W., Schober, D., & Ceusters, W. (2006). Towards a reference terminology for ontology research and development in the biomedical domain. Paper presented at the KR-MED 2006, Biomedical Ontology in Action. Retrieved June 8, 2007, from http://ontology.buffalo.edu/bfo/Terminology_for_Ontologies.pdf
38. Smith, B., & Varzi, A.C. (1997). Fiat and bona fide boundaries: Towards on ontology of spatially extended objects. In Lecture Notes In Computer Science (Vol. 1329, pp. 103-119). London: Springer Verlag.
39. th Annual Conference of the British Computer Society Specialist Group on Expert Systems.
40. Uschold, M., King, M., Moralee, S., & Zorgios, Y. (1998). The enterprise ontology. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 13(1), 31-89.
41. Wand, Y., Storey, V., & Weber, R. (1999). An ontological analysis of the relationship construct in conceptual modeling. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 24(4), 494-528.
42. Wexler, M.N. (2002). Organizational memory and intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(4), 393-415.