Comparing click-through data to purchase decisions for retrieval evaluation

SIGIR 2010 Proceedings - 33rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 761-762

  Hofmann, Katja ^a   Huurnink, Bouke ^a   Bron, Marc ^a   De Rijke, Maarten ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Query log analysis

Indexed keywords

AUDIOVISUAL ARCHIVES; CLICKTHROUGH DATA; EVALUATION; IMPLICIT FEEDBACK; PURCHASE DECISION; QUERY LOGS; RELEVANCE ASSESSMENTS; RELEVANCE JUDGMENT; RETRIEVAL EVALUATION; SYSTEM RANKINGS;

SALES;

IMAGE RETRIEVAL;

EID: 77956025042     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1835449.1835603     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. S. P. Harter. Variations in relevance assessments and the measurement of retrieval effectiveness. JASIS&T, 47(1):37-49, 1996.
2. B. Huurnink, L. Hollink, W. van den Heuvel, and M. de Rijke. The search behavior of media professionals at an audiovisual archive: A transaction log analysis. JASIS&T, 2010. DOI: 10.1002/asi.21327.
3. T. Joachims, L. Granka, B. Pan, H. Hembrooke, and G. Gay. Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. In SIGIR '05, pages 154-161, 2005. ACM.
4. J. Kamps, M. Koolen, and A. Trotman. Comparative analysis of clicks and judgments for IR evaluation. In WSCD '09, pages 80-87, 2009. ACM.
5. F. Radlinski, M. Kurup, and T. Joachims. How does clickthrough data reflect retrieval quality? In CIKM '08, pages 43-52, 2008. ACM.
6. I. Ruthven. Integrating approaches to relevance. New directions in cognitive information retrieval, pages 61-80, 2005. Springer.