Evaluation of effective regurgitant orifice area of mitral valvular regurgitation by multislice cardiac computed tomography

Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 236-239

  Vural, Murat ^a   Ucar, Ozgul ^a   Celebi, Ozlem Ozcan ^a   Cicekcioglu, Hulya ^a   Durmaz, Hasan Ali ^a   Selvi, N Alper ^a   Koparal, Suha ^a   Aydogdu, Sinan ^a  

^a ANKARA TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Echocardiography; Mitral regurgitation; Multislice CT

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MITRAL VALVE REGURGITATION; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MITRAL VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77956012025     PISSN: 09145087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2010.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Carabello B.A., Crawford F.A. Valvular heart disease. N Engl J Med 2001, 345:1652.
2. Feuchtner G.M., Dichtl W., Friedrich G.J., Frick M., Alber H., Schachner T., Bonatti J., Mallouhi A., Frede T., Pachinger O., zur Nedden D., Müller S. Multislice computed tomography for detection of patients with aortic valve stenosis and quantification of severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 47:1410-1417.
3. Feuchtner G.M., Dichtl W., Schachner T., Müller S., Mallouhi A., Friedrich G.J., Nedden D.Z. Diagnostic performance of MDCT for detecting aortic valve regurgitation. Am J Roentgenol 2006, 186:1676-1681.
4. Messika-Zeitoun D., Serfaty J.M., Laissy J.P., Berhili M., Brochet E., Iung B., Vahanian A. Assessment of the mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis by multislice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:411-413.
5. Alkadhi H., Wildermuth S., Bettex D.A., Plass A., Baumert B., Leschka S., Desbiolles L.M., Marincek B., Boehm T. Mitral regurgitation: quantification with 16-detector row CT-initial experience. Radiology 2006, 238:454-463.
6. Bansal D., Singh R.M., Sarkar M., Sureddi R., Mcbreen K.C., Griffis T., Sinha A., Mehta J.L. Assessment of left ventricular function: comparison of cardiac multidetector-row computed tomography with 2-dimension standard echocardiography for assessment of left ventricular function. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2008, 24:317-325.
7. Malm S., Frigstad S., Sagberg E., Larsson H., Skjaerpe T. Accurate and reproducible measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by contrast echocardiography: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 44:1030-1035.
8. Otto C.M. Clinical practice. Evaluation and management of chronic mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med 2001, 345:740-746.
9. Enriquez-Sarano M., Akins C.W., Vahanian A. Mitral regurgitation. Lancet 2009, 373:1382-1394.
10. Otto C.M. Timing of surgery in mitral regurgitation. Heart 2003, 89:100-105.
11. Ahmed M.I., McGiffin D.C., O'Rourke R.A., Dell'Italia L.J. Mitral regurgitation. Curr Probl Cardiol 2009, 34:93-136.
12. Juergens K.U., Grude M., Maintz D., Fallenberg E.M., Wichter T., Heindel W., Fischbach R. Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 2004, 230:403-410.
13. Monin J.L., Dehant P., Roiron C., Monchi M., Tabet J.Y., Clerc P., Fernandez G., Houel R., Garot J., Chauvel C., Gueret P. Functional assessment of mitral regurgitation by transthoracic echocardiography using standardized imaging planes diagnostic accuracy and outcome implications. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:302-309.
14. Dujardin K.S., Enriquez-Sarano M., Bailey K.R., Nishimura R.A., Seward J.B., Tajik A.J. Grading of mitral regurgitation by quantitative Doppler echocardiography: calibration by left ventricular angiography in routine clinical practice. Circulation 1997, 96:3409-3415.
15. Hausleiter J., Meyer T., Hadamitzky M., Huber E., Zankl M., Martinoff S., Kastrati A., Schömig A. Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 2006, 113:1305-1310.