Anatomical parts-based regression using non-negative matrix factorization

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 2863-2870

  Joshi, Swapna ^a   Karthikeyan, S ^a   Manjunath, B S ^a   Grafton, Scott ^b   Kiehl, Kent A ^c  

^a University of California   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN IMAGES; DATA SETS; DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION TECHNIQUES; GRADIENT SMOOTHING; LOCAL REGION; NONNEGATIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION; STATISTICAL REGRESSION;

BLIND SOURCE SEPARATION; COMPUTER VISION; FACTORIZATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

MATRIX ALGEBRA;

EID: 77956006317     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2010.5540022     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. J. Ashburner and K. Friston. Voxel-based morphometry-the methods. Neuroimage, 11(6):805-821, 2000.
2. K. Baek et al. PCA vs. ICA: A comparison on the FERET data set. In Joint Conference on Information Sciences, Durham, NC, pages 824-827. Citeseer, 2002.
3. A. Bell and T. Sejnowski. The independent components of natural scenes are edge filters. Vision research, 37(23):3327-3338, 1997.
4. X. Chen, L. Gu, S. Li, and H. Zhang. Learning representative local features for face detection, IEEE. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume 1, pages 1126-1131, 2001.
5. P. Comon et al. Independent component analysis, a new concept? Signal processing, 36(3):287-314, 1994.
6. T. Cormen, C. Leiserson, R. Rivest, and C. Stein. Introduction to algorithms. The MIT press, 2001.
7. C. Davatzikos, A. Genc, D. Xu, and S. Resnick. Voxel-based morphometry using the RAVENS maps: methods and validation using simulated longitudinal atrophy. NeuroImage, 14(6):1361-1369, 2001.
8. B. Davis, P. Fletcher, E. Bullitt, and S. Joshi. Population shape regression from random design data. In Proceeding of ICCV, 2007.
9. A. Dempster et al. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 39(1):1-38, 1977.
10. Guttmann et al. White matter changes with normal aging. Neurology, 50(4):972, 1998.
11. W. Hardle. Applied nonparametric regression. Cambridge University Press Cambridge, 1990.
12. M. Heiler and C. Schnorr. Learning sparse representations by non-negative matrix factorization and sequential cone programming. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7:1407, 2006.
13. P. Hoyer. Non-negative matrix factorization with sparseness constraints. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 5:1457-1469, 2004.
14. I. Jolliffe. Principal component analysis. 2002.
15. K. Kochi, D. Lehmann, R. Pascual-Marqui, et al. Non-smooth Nonnegative Matrix Factorization (nsNMF). IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 28(3):415, 2006.
16. D. Lee and H. Seung. Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature, 401(6755):788-791, 1999.
17. D. Lee and H. Seung. Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization. Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 556-562, 2001.
18. K. Li. Sliced inverse regression for dimension reduction. Journal of the American Statistical Association, pages 316-327, 1991.
19. K. Li. On principal Hessian directions for data visualization and dimension reduction: Another application of Stein's lemma. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(420):1025-1039, 1992.
20. S. Li, X. Hou, H. Zhang, and Q. Cheng. Learning spatially localized, parts-based representation. In IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume 1. IEEE Computer Society, 2001.
21. M. Matsumae, R. Kikinis, et al. Age-related changes in intracranial compartment volumes in normal adults assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of neurosurgery, 84(6):982-991, 1996.
22. Z. Mortamet, B et al. Effects of healthy aging measured by intracranial compartment volumes using a designed mr brain database. LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 3749:383, 2005.
23. S. Palmer. Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation. Cognitive Psychology, 9(4):441-474, 1977.
24. R. Sandler and M. Lindenbaum. Nonnegative Matrix Factorization with Earth Movers Distance Metric. CVPR, 2009.
25. S. Smith, M. Jenkinson, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage, 23:208-219, 2004.
26. J. Tenenbaum, V. Silva, and J. Langford. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science, 290(5500):2319-2323, 2000.
27. M. Turk and A. Pentland. Eigenfaces for recognition. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 3(1):71-86, 1991.
28. V. Vapnik. The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer Verlag, 2000.
29. Y. Wang et al. Fisher non-negative matrix factorization for learning local features. In Proc. Asian Conf. on Comp. Vision, pages 27-30. Citeseer, 2004.
30. M. Woolrich et al. Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL. NeuroImage, 45(1S1):173-186, 2009.