A hough transform-based voting framework for action recognition

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 2061-2068

  Yao, Angela ^a   Gall, Juergen ^a   Van Gool, Luc ^a,b  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION RECOGNITION; CODEBOOKS; DATA SETS; HOUGH SPACE; HUMAN ACTIONS; LOW-LEVEL FEATURES; MULTI-CLASS; RANDOM TREE; SPATIO-TEMPORAL; STATE-OF-THE-ART PERFORMANCE;

COMPUTER VISION; HOUGH TRANSFORMS; IMAGE RECOGNITION; OPTICAL FLOWS;

MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS;

EID: 77955995201     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2010.5539883     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Ucr videoweb activities dataset. http://vwdata.ee.ucr.edu.
2. D. H. Ballard. Generalizing the hough transform to detect arbitrary shapes. Pattern Recognition, 13(2):111-122, 1981.
3. M. Blank, L. Gorelick, E. Shechtman,M. Irani, and R. Basri. Actions as space-time shapes. In ICCV, 2005.
4. A. F. Bobick and J. W. Davis. The recognition of human movement using temporal templates. TPAMI, 23(3):257-267, 2001.
5. L. Breiman. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1):5-32, 2001.
6. T. Brox, A. Bruhn, N. Papenberg, and J. Weickert. High accuracy optical flow estimation based on a theory for warping. In ECCV, 2004.
7. N. Dalal and B. Triggs. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In CVPR, 2005.
8. P. Dollar, V. Rabaud, G. Cottrell, and S. Belongie. Behavior recognition via sparse spatio-temporal features. In VS-PETS, 2005.
9. A. Doucet, N. D. Freitas, and N. Gordon, editors. Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice. Springer, New York, 2001.
10. A. A. Efros, A. C. Berg, G. Mori, and J. Malik. Recognizing action at a distance. In ICCV, 2003.
11. J. Gall and V. Lempitsky. Class-specific hough forests for object detection. In CVPR, 2009.
12. H. Jhuang, T. Serre, L. Wolf, and T. Poggio. A biologically inspired system for action recognition. In ICCV, 2007.
13. I. Laptev and T. Lindeberg. Space-time interest points. In ICCV, 2003.
14. I. Laptev, M. Marszałek, C. Schmid, and B. Rozenfeld. Learning realistic human actions from movies. In CVPR, 2008.
15. B. Leibe, A. Leonardis, and B. Schiele. Robust object detection with interleaved categorization and segmentation. IJCV, 77(1-3):259-289, 2008.
16. J. Liebelt, C. Schmid, and K. Schertler. Viewpoint-independent object class detection using 3d feature maps. In CVPR, 2008.
17. Z. Lin, Z. Jian, and L.S.Davis. Recognizing actions by shape-motion prototype trees. In ICCV, 2009.
18. J. Liu, J. Luo, and M. Shah. Recognizing realistic actions from videos 'in the wild'. In CVPR09, 2009.
19. S. Maji and J. Malik. Object detection using a max-margin hough transform. In CVPR, 2009.
20. M.D.Rodriguez, J. Ahmed, and M. Shah. Action mach a spatio-temporal maximum average correlation height filter for action recognition. In CVPR, 2008.
21. K. Mikolajczyk and H. Uemura. Action recognition with motion-appearance vocabulary forest. In CVPR, 2008.
22. J. C. Niebles, H. Wang, and L. Fei-Fei. Unsupervised learning of human action categories using spatial-temporal words. IJCV, 79(3):299-318, 2008.
23. A. Oikonomopoulos, I. Patras, and M. Pantic. An implicit spatio-temporal shape model for human activity localization and recognition. In CVPR4HB09, 2009.
24. T. Ojala, M. Pietikainen, and T. Maenpaa. Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. TPAMI, 24(7):971-987, 2002.
25. B. Ommer and J. Malik. Multi-scale object detection by clustering lines. In ICCV, 2009.
26. A. Opelt, A. Pinz, and A. Zisserman. Learning an alphabet of shape and appearance for multi-class object detection. IJCV, 80(1), 2008.
27. C. Rao, A. Yilmaz, and M. Shah. View-invariant representation and recognition of actions. IJCV, 50(2):203-226, 2002.
28. K. Rapantzikos, Y. Avrithis, and S. Kollias. Dense saliency-based spatiotemporal feature points for action recognition. In CVPR, 2009.
29. K. K. Reddy, J. Liu, and M. Shah. Incremental action recognition using feature-tree. In ICCV, 2009.
30. M. Ryoo and J. Aggarwal. Spatio-temporal relationship match: Video structure comparison for recognition of complex human activities. In ICCV, 2009.
31. K. Schindler and L. J. V. Gool. Action snippets: How many frames does human action recognition require? In CVPR, 2008.
32. C. Schuldt, I. Laptev, and B. Caputo. Recognizing human actions: a local svm approach. In ICPR04, 2004.
33. A. Torralba, K. P. Murphy, and W. T. Freeman. Sharing visual features for multiclass and multiview object detection. TPAMI, 29(5):854-869, 2007.
34. H. Wang, M. M. Ullah, A. Kläser, I. Laptev, and C. Schmid. Evaluation of local spatio-temporal features for action recognition. In BMVC, 2009.
35. G.Willems, J. Becker, T. Tuytelaars, and L. V. Gool. Exemplar-based action recognition in video. In BMVC, 2009.
36. L. Yeffet and L.Wolf. Local trinary patterns for human action recognition. In ICCV, 2009.