Rapid and accurate developmental stage recognition of C. elegans from high-throughput image data

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 3089-3096

  White, Amelia G ^a,b   Cipriani, Patricia G ^a   Kao, Huey Ling ^a   Lees, Brandon ^a   Geiger, Davi ^c   Sontag, Eduardo ^b   Gunsalus, Kristin C ^a   Piano, Fabio ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; ELEGANS; EVALUATION FUNCTION; GENETIC SCREENS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT; IMAGE DATA; LOCAL CONSISTENCY; PHENOTYPIC DATA; REAL-TIME SCORING; SMALL OBJECTS;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER VISION; IMAGE ANALYSIS;

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

EID: 77955989179     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2010.5540065     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Brenner, S., The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics, 1974. 77(1): p. 71-94.
2. Genome sequence of the nematode C.elegans:a platform for investigating biology. Science,1998. 282(5396): p.2012-8.
3. Fire, A., et al., Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature, 1998. 391(6669): p. 806-11.
4. Guo, S. and K.J. Kemphues, par-1, a gene required for establishing polarity in C. elegans embryos, encodes a putative Ser/Thr kinase that is asymmetrically distributed. Cell, 1995. 81(4): p. 611-20.
5. Kamath, R.S., et al., Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature, 2003. 421(6920): p. 231-7.
6. Rual, J.F., et al., Toward improving Caenorhabditis elegans phenome mapping with an ORFeome-based RNAi library. Genome Res, 2004. 14(10B): p. 2162-8.
7. Ohya, Y., et al., High-dimensional and large-scale phenotyping of yeast mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2005. 102(52): p. 19015-20.
8. Jones, T.R., et al., Scoring diverse cellular morphologies in image-based screens with iterative feedback and machine learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2009.106(6): p.1826-31.
9. Geng, W., et al., Automatic tracking, feature extraction and classification of C elegans phenotypes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2004. 51(10): p. 1811-20.
10. Tsibidis, G.D. and N. Tavernarakis, Nemo: a computational tool for analyzing nematode locomotion. BMC Neurosci, 2007. 8: p. 86.
11. Ning, F., et al., Toward automatic phenotyping of developing embryos from videos. IEEE Trans Image Process, 2005. 14(9): p. 1360-71.
12. Cronin, C.J., Z. Feng, and W.R. Schafer, Automated imaging of C. elegans behavior. Methods Mol Biol, 2006. 351: p. 241-51.
13. Huang, K.M., P. Cosman, and W.R. Schafer, Automated detection and analysis of foraging behavior in C. elegans. J Neurosci Methods, 2008. 171(1): p. 153-64.
14. Binford, B.a., ACRONYM. 1981.
15. Forsyth, D.A.a.F., M. M., Automatic Detection of Human Nudes. IJCV, 1999. 32(1): p. 14.
16. Grimson, W.E.L., Object Recognition by Computer-The Role of Geometric Constaints. The MIT Press Classics Series. 1990, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Jean Ponce, M.C., Sung-il Pae and Steve Sullivan., Shape Models and Object Recognition. Shape, Contour and Grouping in Computer Vision, 1999.
18. Forsyth, S.I.a.D.A., Probabilistic methods for finding people. IJCV, 2001. 43(1): p. 23.
19. K. Mikolajczyk, B.L., and B. Schiele, Multiple Object Class Detection with a Generative Model. CVPR, 2006.
20. Fei-Fei, L.a.F., R. and Perona, P, Learning Generative Visual Models for 101 Object Categories. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 2006.
21. V. Ferrari, L.F., F. Jurie, and C. Schmid, Groups of Adjacent Contour Segments for Object Detection. INRIA Technical Report, Grenoble, 2006.
22. LeCun, H., and Bottou, Learning Methods for Generic Object Recognition with Invariance to Pose and Lighting. CVPR, 2004.
23. T. Serre, L.W., S. Bileschi, M. Riesenhuber and T. Poggio, Object recognition with cortex-like mechanisms. IEEE PAMI, 2007.
24. Ullman, S., Sali, E. & Vidal-Naquet, M, A fragment-based approach to object representation and classification. . Arcelli, L.P. Cordella & G. Sanniti di Baja (eds.), Int. Workshop on Visual Form, Berlin, 2001: p. 15.
25. S. Lazebnik, C.S., and J. Ponce, A Discriminative Framework for Texture and Object Recognition Using Local Image Features.
26. Geman, Y.J.a.S., Context and hierarchy in a probabilistic image model. CVPR, 2006: p. 8.
27. Jedynak, D.G.a.B., An active testing model for tracking roads from satellite images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell, 1996. 18: p. 14.
28. Jones, P.V.a.M., Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features. Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2001: p. 8.
29. Kevin Jarrett, K.K., Marc'Aurelio Ranzato and Yann LeCun, What is the Best Multi-Stage Architecture for Object Recognition? Proc. International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'09), 2009.
30. Geman, Y.A.a.D., A computational model for visual selection. Neural Computation, 1999. 11: p. 14.
31. W. T. Freeman, E.H.A., The Design and use of Steerable Filters. IEEE Transactions on PAMI, 1991. 13: p. 15.
32. Boykov, Y., An Experimental Comparison of Min-Cut/Max-Flow Algorithms for Energy Minimization in Computer Vision. IEEE Transactions on PAMI, 2004. 13: p. 9.
33. D.Geiger,T. Liu, R.V. K., Representation and Self-Similarity of Shapes.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2003. 25(1): p. 86.
34. Kimia, K.S.a.B.B., Parts of Visual Form: Computational Aspects. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1995. 17(3): p. 12.
35. Burges, C., A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition. Data Mining Knowledge Discovery, 1998. 2: p. 46